Canadian? I love our flimsy copyright laws.linkvegeta said:IT's not illegal to download via bit torrent, its illegal to share via uploading. At least where im from anyway.
No, how are you going to make profit just watching a video?jono793 said:So, Let's get this straight:
Streaming unlicensed copyright works off of YouTube can get you, potentially, five years inside.
They don't advertise for every video. Hell, I'm turning into a brony watching the show ad free off youtube. If they had some ads, they probably would have been taken down by now.Whereas
Google, who owns of YouTube, hosts all of that unlicensed copyrighted content and earns revenue off the back of it in the form of advertising, is effectively immune from copyright claims.
Madness!
Nothing to apologize for. I'm just here to enlighten, not criticize =)DJDarque said:Ok. You're right. It was a pretty bad generalization, but I'm willing to guess that when most Joe Blows such as myself think of actors, despite probably knowing they're not in the majority, think of those big name actors first.ChildofGallifrey said:That's only maybe 1% (2% if you're feeling generous) of actors that make that, and ONLY on major studio blockbusters. The overwhelming majority of actors make between $100-$150 per 16 hour day and are lucky to work one week per month (speaking as an actor here). Out of the millions of actors out there, only about 5% actually make their living off of it. 1% of those are the big-money stars.DJDarque said:Sorry actors and actresses, but maybe if you weren't paid hundreds of thousands to millions per movie I might buy that statement, but seeing as how a lot of you are I don't.
But again, you're right, and I'm sorry for generalizing.
Remember the really old days when all you had to do is provide food and lodging for a bard or minstrel and you would have a day or more of entertainment? I'd like that idea as it frees up income to be given to teachers, fire fighters, police, and soldiers cause you know they protect and educate us. But that's my opinion take it for what you will.Puddle Jumper said:First of all, congratulations on making a law that has everyone scratching their heads about what it actually means.
1) Anyone watching a streamed video that isn't profiting from it isn't doing anything illegal, according to the law.
2) This will only apply in America, which means that you will be spending an ungodly amount of the tax payers money and your own time trying to catch someone watching TV shows/movies that are not or no longer available where they live.
3) These companies are already losing tons of money because of Digital recording devices and rental shops. What's being done about them?
God damn it, guys. When are you going to realize that you're hemorrhaging money on the bloody actors! CUT THEIR PAY AND WATCH WHAT HAPPENS. If normal people can survive on 20.000 bucks per year, I'm sure that actors and actresses can cut a couple of million from their pay. Or singers for that matter. I'm positive that if you no longer give Justin Bieber any more money, he'll still be able to live till he's 80 and not work another day in his life. That's just plain retarded.
Once you've fixed that, only THEN are you allowed to even think about bitching about the people streaming videos.
probably, it's a sad day when the internet is devoid of ponies.Canid117 said:Does this mean we wont be able to upload full episodes of MLP:FIM to Youtube anymore?
Only if they back-trace it. Then, the consequences will never be the same.commodore96 said:So do we get cyber police now to catch these streamers?
Yes it is streaming. Watching the streaming isn't illegal(yet). Hosting a TV show is illegal unless you have permission(which can get weird if you look at some shows like a sports countdown featuring multiple sports from say ESPN, because you need a permission from each broadcast, plus ESPN's permission).Hristo Tzonkov said:Wait I don't understand what's streaming...Apart from animes and southpark does watching song videos on youtube count as streaming?
Extremely easy actually. People can just tap into a person's unsecured wifi and do all sorts of illegal stuff with little to no effort. There was actually a court ruling that stated an IP address alone can't be used to ID someone. Which makes me a little curious as to how they are going to enforce these ridiculous laws.deth2munkies said:My only concern is exactly how they plan on consistently getting this information and how easy it is to mess with IP addresses to get others in trouble, from using proxies to using your neighbor's internet, it just seems like it'd be more trouble than its worth to actually enforce unless they set up some online stings or something.
I imagine a very large part of it has to do with languages. It's a lot harder to set up for a large number of countries with a variety of languages spoken. I also imagine that the MPAA and TV equivalent would want larger sums of money for their products.teebeeohh said:so why isn't there a paid streaming service for customers outside the US?
you could make tons of money of people who don't want to wait for dvds. And right now there is no legal alternative.