The article gives absolutely no quotes or official references, and tells us that "Argonia was announced back in September this year at EGX 2014." Which, while the Elder Scrolls 6 definitely seems to have been announced, I am really struggling to find
any direct quotes from Bethesda themselves to confirm it would actually be named "Argonia" Specifically.
I can find a torrent of sites from before the date predicting that it would be an announcement of Argonia, but remember when all the news sites were certain Bethesda's 'Dishonoured' teaser was going to be Skyrim DLC?
The videogame press are like reverse Cassandras [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra] (cursed to be always wrong but everyone listens to them anyway)
Combine that with this hilariously dumb error from the article:
"It's been ten years since the first Elder Scrolls title released"
No, it's been 20 years from the first Elder scrolls game. Jeez, it's a simple Google away, but who cares about fact checking nowadays? Certainly not masterherald.com's editor.
Bethesda Softworks is responsible for creating half the fantasy RPG that we currently have, from Skyrim to Doom and Wolfenstein, etc.
All I have to say is
And then there's this:
"A report published on the Tehran Chronicle said that Bethesda has not just confirmed the release date of the game, but has also started working towards the development."
- the article itself quotes the "Tehran Chronicle" for it's information. After searching for the Tehran Chronicle's Pulitzer prize winning article on the subject I discovered it is titled thusly - "Elder Scrolls 6 is under heavy development with release date 4-5 years after Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim - News and Rumors"
And that
'news and rumours' subheading is somewhat an important caveat as it included a whole lot of rumours and nothing I'd call "news":
The last Elder Scroll game was launched three years ago and it was The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. Observing the previous release patterns, we can say that developer Bethesda has an average development time of 4 to 5 years and with that said, we can expect a new game somewhere roughly between 2015 and 2016.
That is the brunt of the justification for the release date. That is literally the only rationale for the release date that they state: They've just said 'Oblivion took 4 years and Skyrim took 5 years, and averages based on 2 figures are always perfectly accurate, so let's publish it as 'roughly' and call it
news and rumours'
And this is the justification for the
Argonia reveal:
Every game of the series has focused on one of the province of the games world Cyrodil and only three provinces are left to be the center focus. Argonia is the province out of the 3 which was referenced the most in Skyrim. It is also known as the black marsh.
So we can expect Elder Scrolls 6 to be set up in Argonia,
Things wrong with this statement:
1. The game world is Tamriel, not "Cyrodil"
2. Cyrodiil has two i's.
3. There are not just 3 provinces left to be a 'center focus', there is 4 if you don't include returning to previous provinces (Summerset isles, Elsewyr, Valenwood and Blackmarsh)
4. Argonia was not "referenced most" in Skyrim, that would probably be Summerset Isles where
the imminent invasion of the Thalmor was going to come from.
5. Even if it was mentioned most that wouldn't prove anything about where the next Elder Scrolls game was going to be.
So that means that all the information is in fact based on the clickbait ramblings of madmen. And it just flourishes on the internet due to all these gaming sites that never bother to do the most basic of fact checking or anything.
Here's the best worst article I could find:
hallels.com includes this wonderful gem of journalistic research:
According to Franchise Herald, The Elder Scrolls is the series of open world fantasy game, which has sold more than thirty million copies around the world after it had made its name as the provider of free form gameplay.
Read more: http://www.hallels.com/articles/11480/20141028/elder-scrolls-6-argonia-release-date-set-march-2016.htm#ixzz3Hxg8A5DL
They literally quote another article in order to define what the Elder Scrolls actually is. Amazingly they manage to top that laziness with this downright bizarre stupidity:
Aside from the series of The Elder Scrolls, Bethesda is also the creator of Fallout franchise, which is among the different pioneers of games.
Ignoring the incomprehensible ending of that sentence which makes no sense whatsoever, Bethesda did not create the Fallout franchise (as any longrunning Fallout fan could tell you - or a quick google search would reveal) Interplay created Fallout, and sold it to Bethesda after Fallout 2 (Which explains the series jump from isometric to FPS gameplay).
Frankly all the websites reporting on this seem to be part of the infinite monkeys experiment, and obviously they've a long way to go before they get anywhere near Shakespeare. I've seen better researched and written articles in School magazines. Whether it is true or not, I wouldn't take the word of these 'journalists' for it, they don't know their arse from their knee-arrow.