That quote has nothing to do with either fascism or being right wing.Deadman Walkin said:What is hilarious about this quote is how popular it is. It was in some Social review notes, and was just on a Right-Wing/Fascism test I wrote earlier todayAureliano said:snip
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came%E2%80%A6
It has a ton to do with fascism since it's a political ideology which enables it to happen if the leader chooses to do so.Baresark said:LoL, lawmakers are so stupid. So easy to get around.
That quote has nothing to do with either fascism or being right wing.Deadman Walkin said:What is hilarious about this quote is how popular it is. It was in some Social review notes, and was just on a Right-Wing/Fascism test I wrote earlier todayAureliano said:snip
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came%E2%80%A6
This quote points out a very true state of occurrence that is fairly common. It's all good as long as you are taking away other peoples stuff, but as soon as it happens to you, it won't be.
I will say this though... it's kind of out a place for this particular topic... and when I say kind of... I mean completely. I wouldn't compare a proposed bill to limit IP theft comparable to anything that quote mentions or is about.
IP is self limiting and destructive in nature to peoples natural tendency to spread knowledge to one another. I say, stop people all you want, all you will do is ensure that larger and larger numbers of people will become more and more ignorant.
No it doesn't have anything to do with the right wing, but it DOES parallel with Hitler's Reich, which was what most of the test happened to be about.Baresark said:That quote has nothing to do with either fascism or being right wing.
Don't worry, most of the countries out there have no intention of dropping their pants and bending over anytime soon.Centrophy said:"First, it allows for "private right of action," which means that not only the Attorney General but also "a rights holder who is the victim of the infringement" can pursue action in the courts against "the owner, registrant or internet site dedicated to infringement, whether domestic or foreign," and second, it will also force search engines to censor such sites out of their lists."
whether domestic or foreign
domestic or foreign
or foreign
foreign
Really? Really? You want to try and exert control over not just internet in the US but the rest of the world too? This really needs to get shot down and quickly.