actually the graph is flawed because the creator put certain pokemon in the wrong category (like putting pawniard into the inanimate group instead of humanoid)galdon2004 said:How is 15-16% in the last two generations statistically similar to 8-9% in first and third gen? if you count 2 which has 2% the last two generations have statistically double the number of inanimate object designs than the first three.Some_weirdGuy said:That's also true, seems to be a few more inanimate-object pokemon.
Though i'd assume thats got to do with already having used so many real and mythological animals already, so they're trying to find other sources.
coincidently in the same place I saw the picture in the OP it also had this, which mentions pokemon by... 'source'? whatever you'd call it, by whether they're base don plants, animals, inanimate objects, etc.
(guize i bet you totally can't guess where i was wasting time on)
