One of the new Pokemon at 0:23 resembles an Egyptian sarcophagus. I'm guessing it's a Rock/Ghost type.
The plot's already been used, thank god. I think that's what the old Pokemon manga was about.Singing Gremlin said:Right, I'm calling it. First two pokemon, now three. We'll be seeing full pokemon armies in a turned based (or possibly even real time) strategy game before long.
Catch them, Train them, Battle them, Rule them.
For the first time ever, you will be able to catch and deploy over one thousand on-screen pokemon as, starting with only a single pokemon you build a squad, and then an army capable of defeating the corrupt, tyrannical cabal that is the elite four. As you progress you shall defeat, one by one, the 'gyms' and their lackeys that keep the lands of Johto in check. Will you free the people and their pokemon from the yoke of oppression, or use the gyms to supply you with a stream of new, fanatical recruits?
The fate of the world is in your hands.
It's from "Kure-nai", a 12-episode series in which a teenage bodyguard has to look after a spoilt seven year old girl from a rich but isolated family. It's a lot more complicated than that, but it'd take me forever to write a whole synopsis, anyway I personally like it because it's cute and the kid reminds me of my own little sister whos of a similar age!Knorke said:A wee bit off-topic here but as a anime enthusiast I have to ask:JoJoDeathunter said:OT: Despite the fact that I'm already feeling confused about what will happen during triplet battles, as a pokefan I can say to this...
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!
Which anime?
am i blind or what, i saw no pokemon evolving in mid battle, the time pleasePlurralbles said:HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT! A pokemon evolved mid battle!?
Triple battles... meh. Seems like it'd be pretty strategic.
Yeah, at 24-26 the pokemon transformed, but it looked at first like it had evolved becasue I saw that pokemon's prevolution to its left before the transform and they melded into one. It was my eyes playing tricks on me. It's still a strange new ability.aaronx83 said:am i blind or what, i saw no pokemon evolving in mid battle, the time pleasePlurralbles said:HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT HOLY SHIT! A pokemon evolved mid battle!?
Triple battles... meh. Seems like it'd be pretty strategic.
and it did evolve you may count with a lot of HOLY SHIT's coming from my way
I think you're just being mean, not objective. You attack. That's just my opinion. I think it's all in how you define 'real' changes, and i don't think he was talking about the technical changes you're spouting about. I mean, for an example, you can argue that pokemon red and blue are the same/different game, with 'changes' in each. You play semantics, when the only thing you're really challenging is someone's opinion. Personally, everyone is entitled to say what they wish, even you. Just a thought though, if you're going to take someone literally just to make some kind of 'i'm the end all to be all' point, you should probably expect to get some feedback that you may not like as well.Twilight.falls said:I attempt to remain objective, "They haven't added real changes" is a false statement, one that I merely challenged. You can not say that Nintendo has not changed the system, as they have. If one was to say "The system is not fun" that would be opinion. "The system has not changed" is a false statement.eyedonutkair said:Do you know what an opinion is?Twilight.falls said:Nintendo has changed the battle system in every generation.Marter said:I'd like some real changes please Nintendo. 3 on 3 is just going to get too much of a pain to manage.
Generation 1: Added the system, obviously
Generation 2: Weather effects, additions of 2 new types, splitting the Special stat into Special Attack and Special Defense, multitude of new moves and Pokemon
Generation 3: Abilities, Current IV and EV system, Double Battles, Natures, multitude of new moves and Pokemon
Generation 4: Special and Physical move split, multitude of new moves and Pokemon
Generation 5: So far, Triple battles, and a multitude of new moves and Pokemon
To say that Nintendo is not adding "Real changes" is illogical.
Please note that I responded to the first sentence, not the second, which is most definitely opinion.
Well, there is also Halo and WoW, arguably. I do see what you're saying though. On the other hand, they say 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.'WhiteTigerShiro said:I'm surprised to see so many people going nuts over the 3v3 thing. It's like trying to sell using the WiiMote to aim the Hookshot as an innovation for the Zelda series. I mean really... it's basically an old idea from a generation or two back, except now they've added another number. Has the Pokemon series really gotten so bland that such a thing is considered bold and innovative?
Frankly, I got bored when the third generation was coming out. It felt like they were just re-releasing the same game I had bought twice already only with a couple of minor improvements. The Pokemon series has innovated less during its lifetime than Left 4 Dead did with just one sequel, and I'm always seeing people gripe about how such-and-such series is just the same game over and over again. Yet despite that, people are always doing back-flips every time a new Pokemon is coming out.
I don't know which is worse... the fact that a series I used to love has long-since turned into a blatant cash cow, or the fact that the fans of the series are so eager to keep that cow healthy.