just one of microsofts many userfriendly and high-quality products : Dbrewbeard said:5% would be unacceptable. 42% is stupid high. Where was their quality control team? What the hell happened?
Basically, this article is pointing out the existence of a flawed poll. When the article itself says the poll is bad, believe it. I'm glad they went into detail as to why it was flawed. I'd love to see a study that finds out the failure rate of the different chip developers.Austin MacKenzie said:While the numbers are lower, the No Fuss Reviews poll may have some flawed data. ...
The survey also failed to take into account the amount of time the consoles were used or how long they were played, data that was suspected to have inflated the Xbox 360's numbers in the Game Informer poll. Finally, the survey did not take into account the manufacture dates of the systems, another factor which likely plays a huge part in the Xbox 360 failure. The initial Xbox 360s used chips manufactured by Falcon, which were notoriously unreliable. In 2008, Microsoft switched to chip developer Jasper, and projections indicate that this change has made the constant failure that plagued the earlier consoles a thing of the past. That fact alone could very well have contributed to the decline in figures, as more new consoles are placed on the market, the likelihood of failure decreases.