New "Shockwave" Engine Design Solves Energy Crisis

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
New "Shockwave" Engine Design Solves Energy Crisis



The new engine uses a disc which channels gas and air around to generate electricity, reducing gas consumption by 90 percent.

Norman Muller at Michigan State University [http://www.egr.msu.edu/mueller/] may be cheering for his school's Spartans in the NCAA tournament this week, but I'm way more excited for what his research team has designed. The internal combustion engine that powers most cars and trucks in the world hasn't changed drastically in 150 years, but the piston-based system wastes almost 85 percent of the energy. Muller's innovative disk of metal has carefully ground channels that funnel gas and air so that the disk spins with minimal waste. Using the shockwave engine to power an electrical generator in hybrid vehicles would replace many of the components of automobiles like the radiator, valves and camshaft, reducing the vehicles weight by almost 20 percent. Muller showed off his shockwave engine last week to the US Department of Energy.

"It's a new engine," Muller said. "It uses shockwaves to transmit energy from the expansion and compression [of gas] significantly reducing production costs and weight."

The design is simple once you wrap your brain around the concept. A gas-air mixture enters the center of the disc and as the rotor turns, the mixture is compressed because the channels are blocked. A spark ignites the gas, sending shockwaves of energy inwards which turns the rotor and starts the process over again. The turning disk powers a generator, allowing much less gas to be used to create

I'm not a mechanical engineer, but I suppose it's possible that a drive shaft could also be attached to this engine to eventually transfer the energy to the wheels of a car. What's not clear is whether this shockwave engine will produce enough torque to start a heavy car moving from 0 mph, but hopefully the reduced weight of the vehicle would make that possible.

Maybe it's just because gas is almost $4 a gallon, but Muller's design is pretty exciting. Listen up, Detroit. Let's get this baby into production. Stat.


Thanks to [user]CoverYourHead[/user] for the tip.

Source: New Scientist [http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20928035.100-shock-wave-puts-hybrid-engines-in-a-spin.html]

Permalink
 

FarleShadow

New member
Oct 31, 2008
432
0
0
I'm sorry, but I'm getting more annoyed about every little invention that 'solves the X crisis' while still using oil.

No people, recycling or Shockwaving isn't saving the world, its just not screwing it up as fast. End of!
 

ffian1

New member
Mar 10, 2010
83
0
0
This is good news - I just hope someone high enough up the food-chain notices the potential of this gizmo
 

BreakfastMan

Scandinavian Jawbreaker
Jul 22, 2010
4,367
0
0
Pshh, like OPEC would let that thing go into mass-production without a fight. I think we are still years away from something that will truly solve the energy crisis.
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
FarleShadow said:
I'm sorry, but I'm getting more annoyed about every little invention that 'solves the X crisis' while still using oil.

No people, recycling or Shockwaving isn't saving the world, its just not screwing it up as fast. End of!
Oh, well I suppose if you won't take anything other than a 100% reduction of fossil fuel consumption we can just as well continue using it until we've found the magic solution. Sorry, Michigan State University, FarleShadow does not approve. Back to work.
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
Why did I see the word 'engine' and automatically think of something you base a game off of and not what you use to power a car?
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
Cool! But that video... sucked. I want to see it in action and see how it actually works.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
14,518
3,467
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
sounds cool and all but I want to see some application of it
 

Shade184

New member
Nov 11, 2009
367
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Why did I see the word 'engine' and automatically think of something you base a game off of and not what you use to power a car?
Haha, I did that too.
 

cyber95

New member
Feb 28, 2008
107
0
0
Is it strange that the first thing I thought of when seeing the thread title was an improved flash player?
 

Goldeneye1989

Deathwalker
Mar 9, 2009
685
0
0
If this works well.....has this single person saved the american motor industry and the American Economy with one simple design. I really hope that people jump on this now....
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
BabySinclair said:
20 to 1 it gets bought by OPEC or a major car company and never sees the light of day
Those motherfuckers are gonna be the cause of some major anarchy very soon.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
18,709
3,594
118
FarleShadow said:
I'm sorry, but I'm getting more annoyed about every little invention that 'solves the X crisis' while still using oil.

No people, recycling or Shockwaving isn't saving the world, its just not screwing it up as fast. End of!
Assuming that it works at all?

Reduces petrol consumption by 90%? IE, 10 times most efficient than what we have now?

According to this article, current engines are only 15% efficient...doesn't this mean that this engine is 150% effective? Um...
 

RagingNinja

New member
Dec 13, 2010
17
0
0
thaluikhain said:
FarleShadow said:
I'm sorry, but I'm getting more annoyed about every little invention that 'solves the X crisis' while still using oil.

No people, recycling or Shockwaving isn't saving the world, its just not screwing it up as fast. End of!
Assuming that it works at all?

Reduces petrol consumption by 90%? IE, 10 times most efficient than what we have now?

According to this article, current engines are only 15% efficient...doesn't this mean that this engine is 150% effective? Um...
Math fail. It is possible for something to be 150% more efficient than something else. It means it does more, using less resources.
 

Danpascooch

Zombie Specialist
Apr 16, 2009
5,231
0
0
This doesn't make any sense... how do they direct the force of the ignited gas to only one direction? Wouldn't the explosion provide an equal torque clockwise and counterclockwise thus keeping the turning stationary?