Father Time said:
Now why doesn't Anonymous attack them?
They are just black hats at this point.
JWRosser said:
I don't understand why. What are they trying to prove? Do they think that they're some sort of 'anarchistic vigilante' style hero? There's no need for all of this, and has an impact on a lot of innocent people.
They're not black hats, because as it seems they're not using the information they take for their own personal gain. They hacked nintendo, but didn't do anything.
But they're obviously not whitehats either. As risky.biz [http://risky.biz/lulzsec] said; they're grey hats.
I think they're just doing it because they think it's funny how big business, government agencies and even other programmers have really bad security, so they're showing how bad the security really is.
I see people bringing sony into this. It's not about that, as dogstile said:
dogstile said:
They don't want to destroy Sony. They want their lulz. They're bored of Sony, ONTO BRINK! Apparently.
This is exactly right. Sony was an easy target that was being attacked by many other hackers, so they jumped on the bandwagon. Now that Sony has got no more targets, it's literally just onto the next one.
I wouldn't be surprised if they chose targets by covering a wall with names of developers, companies and other entities with "secure" websites, then randomly throwing darts at it.