New US ISP sanctioned/controlled piracy database will mean the end to internet privacy.

Nazz3

New member
Sep 11, 2009
861
0
0
Jabberwock xeno said:
Oh, the protect IP act is pretty bad as well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect_IP_Act
"Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property"

Really? They just HAD to make 'protect' into an acronym? 'Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity' wut
 

robert01

New member
Jul 22, 2011
351
0
0
I don't really pirate things anymore, but this is a step in the wrong direction for sure. The majority of government parties around the world(and corporations) want privacy abolished on the internet.

ISP want this so they can charge you a SHIT ton of money for the content you view legally(pay more for say data sent from You Tube, or game servers).

Media companies want it so you held accountable for the content you might pirate.

Governments want it so they can stop crimes, and of course collect the taxes from the above two.

This is simply another blow in the side to net neutrality, which is something that is being threatened more and more lately.

Capitalism will destroy the internet and its free wealth of information because of piracy. There will be a day that browsing pornography will cost you more per MB(or GB) than it will be to read the new, because ISP know that porn = more $$$ for them.

If this really concerns you so much look up your countries Pirate Party, and support them. These are the guys that are attempting to stop this kind of stuff from happening(well not this because they don't condone downloading illegal content), but they believe in keeping the internet and open place.

Also if it is one company keeping all this information, what kind of privacy policies are they being held to? They will be sitting on a wealth of information, in the form of statistics, that companies will want to purchase.

babinro said:
I guess I must be misinterpreting the article because I see nothing here to get angry about if you are using the internet for legal purposes.

ISP's will hold information they already hold. Information will not be shared unless there is legal cause to do so. And the individual ISP can choose the punishment they want to inflict towards the person breaking the law. Meaning if you don't like how your provider handles your illegal use of the internet...you can find another one.
I think the biggest problem here is that it is going to be managed by a company now and not enforced by the ISP which to my understanding has been the case. Your IP numbers will sit in a vault at a company who can sell this information to advertising companies, who can then direct information your way. Because lets be honest, who says these guys will only watch illegal torrents. Although illegal torrents probably make the vast majority or torrents out there, they will probably watch the legal ones as well.
 

llubtoille

New member
Apr 12, 2010
268
0
0
Stall said:
ThatDaveDude1 said:
It won't bother you from a practical standpoint if you don't illegally download.

It can still bother you on principle regardless.
_

Men can still care about Women's Rights. Straight people can still care about Gay Rights. Human beings can still care about Animal Rights.

Why do you feel that in this one area people need to be directly affected to give a shit, when they don't have to be in any other?
Did you just draw a parallel between piracy and women's/gay rights? Um, alright... that's an interesting analogy. Piracy is kind of illegal you know. Last time I checked, it wasn't a basic human right like, say what women's/gay rights and such.
Not terribly long ago (and in some countries today) gay 'activities' were illegal,
So it's not unthinkable to compare media piracy to the above.
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,253
0
0
This is beyond stupid. I can't believe I'm actually seeing posts in support or without-irk.

Did you notice how they're picking out 'pirates' by the sites people go to? Not every torrent is an illegal file. So if a band were to put up a song or album on a file-sharing site (which I have seen done) and I downloaded it, my ISP would consider me a pirate and I'd already have a warning on my rap. And I didn't even do something illegal.

Beyond that, your ISP would know everything about your activity online. Whether you have anything to hide or not, isn't that discomforting? Don't you find that wrong at all?

Now, I won't say anything like 'people have a right to the Internet,' but given the importance of the Internet in modern society, can you imagine how crippled someone would be without an Internet connection? That's just not fair, plain and simple.

This is essentially the same thing as tapping phones to prevent drug deals, and I'm sure none of you would like that at all. (I don't know how often deals are made or initiated over the phone, but for all intents and purposes let's say it's relatively common.)

This is a matter of privacy, not of piracy.
 

mcpop9

Elite Member
Jan 27, 2010
4,018
0
41
I can't wait to see the repercussions of this if this happens. i salute those who created this idea just for having the balls to do so. this deserves to be riddled with more bullets than Bonnie and Clyde were.
 

Charli

New member
Nov 23, 2008
3,445
0
0
Yeah sorry I don't like not knowing what people have access to information stored in my computer and make no mistake that is the issue here. Internet pirates I have no problem with putting a stop to but... this seems a tad too... invasive.
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
Stall said:
You know, if you didn't pirate things, you wouldn't have to worry about it. Saying you are concerned with this sort-of thing is more or less admitting to piracy, since it wouldn't bother you in the slightest if you didn't illegally download things.
Being concerned about a gross violation of privacy and blatant violations of several laws does not make you a pirate. It makes you a concerned citizen.
 

strum4h

New member
Jan 3, 2009
646
0
0
Stall said:
You know, if you didn't pirate things, you wouldn't have to worry about it. Saying you are concerned with this sort-of thing is more or less admitting to piracy, since it wouldn't bother you in the slightest if you didn't illegally download things.
That is like saying if you have nothing to hide why not just have no walls in your house. This is a slippery slope.
 

Fbuh

New member
Feb 3, 2009
1,233
0
0
What would be neat is a program that constantly reassigns your IP address every few seconds, or perhaps every time you open the internet.
 

crepesack

New member
May 20, 2008
1,189
0
0
Stall said:
You know, if you didn't pirate things, you wouldn't have to worry about it. Saying you are concerned with this sort-of thing is more or less admitting to piracy, since it wouldn't bother you in the slightest if you didn't illegally download things.
There's no way they can tell what data you're transferring. I could be downloading a bunch of F2P games that takes up 10gb and for all they know I'm pirating 10gb of shitty music.
 

The Lesbian Flower

New member
May 25, 2011
154
0
0
I'm pretty sure I've gotten one of these notifications from my internet provider. They shut off my internet because they found out I had used BitTorrent to download some movies and wouldn't let me back on until I promised not to do it again. In my defense, I didn't know it was illegal. I thought that downloading movies was only illegal if you burned them onto DVDs and then sold them for profit. I was just in it to see movies I otherwise could not find.
 

Itsthefuzz

New member
Apr 1, 2010
221
0
0
I don't pirate. I have a friend that does, and constantly tells me to, but I still don't... but I honestly just think that pirates will get past it and it will just wasted. It also might harm others who didn't think to put a password on their internet, which is their fault but sometimes it happens.

Oh and
 

Dense_Electric

New member
Jul 29, 2009
615
0
0
Stall said:
You know, if you didn't pirate things, you wouldn't have to worry about it. Saying you are concerned with this sort-of thing is more or less admitting to piracy, since it wouldn't bother you in the slightest if you didn't illegally download things.
That's pretty much the dumbest statement I've ever heard. Whatever software they're using to detect allegedly illegal downloads has no way of knowing if the download is actually illegal. I could be downloading a bunch of freeware stuff that happens to be large enough to require a torrent file. I could be downloading a digital copy of a film or book I've already legally purchased. I could be replacing a game I've legally purchased but lost or damaged. I could be downloading something that I absolutely cannot find anywhere to purchase. There are any number of legitimate reasons one might use P2P file sharing, but until such time as computers gain the ability to make distinctions in such grey areas, they're punishing both the guilty and the innocent alike.

I don't download things I haven't already purchased in some form or another, and this bothers me. Even if computers could make such distinctions as I talked about, it bothers me out of sheer damn principle. As a self-professed libertarian, this strikes me as very Orwellian.
 

Tiger Sora

New member
Aug 23, 2008
2,220
0
0
*Looks off the hat rim* Looks like a kuufuffle is happening in the pants. Better send an exploration team to find out whats going on.

Government is gona let the ISP's do what they want....... Well hope for you guys this will be harpooned. But in Canada were safe for now. Last year our government and ISP's were making a big deal of bandwidth limit or something. Which was quite utterly blown out of the water. And since this seems to infringe on privacy. Something we Canadians hold to heart, I don't even know if they'll dare to try to do something like this here. We can be a very vocal people.