And the Industry apologists are in the house. Yes, it is just as easy to sue individually as it is in a class action. That's why they are removing the right to have a class action, becuase the other ways to sue are just as scary to them. Give me a break.NLS said:I guess nobody actually read your first post or the OP for that matter :\ Which is a shame, because cases like this get blown out of proportions all the time because people need to rage.Absolutionis said:I guess you people really enjoy your ignorant knee-jerk reactions.
Note that you can still sue. You just can't make it class-action.
Indeed and if refusing simply prevents you from using Live, well, I have that paid up Feb 2013 so I would want a refund on that.ph0b0s123 said:What I want to know, is if this is a choice between giving up a right or your Xbox becoming useless, where is the redress. If I don't want to give this right away, where is a refund for the now useless hardware and software I purchased. Microsoft and others are changing the nature of the contract between us, so they should be liable for the change making our consoles useless.
I think there should be a class action about these companies removing our right to have a class actions, under duress. The duress being sign this or your Xbox becomes a paper weight. I think this is another case of law and justice not being mutually exclusive
I guess you didn't read the other posts pointing out that without class action lawsuits, it's pretty tough for individuals to sue corporations with an army of lawyers.NLS said:I guess nobody actually read your first post or the OP for that matter :\ Which is a shame, because cases like this get blown out of proportions all the time because people need to rage.Absolutionis said:I guess you people really enjoy your ignorant knee-jerk reactions.
Note that you can still sue. You just can't make it class-action.
...basically that. If you have a problem with your Xbox or something, it's dealt with between you and Microsoft. It doesn't "prevent" legal procedures. It just states that you need to actually talk to Microsoft before anything like that. It even says in 18.1.6:Absolutionis said:People need to realize this isn't a bad thing. If something terrible happens, you can still sue. The issue is that you simply can't jump on a class-action lawsuit bandwagon where in the end you'll get $0.10 and the lawyer gets millions.
See? You first try and work it out without involving courtroom fees (which frankly, Microsoft can afford, and the average gamer probably can't for very long), and if the problem is still present afterward, you can bring charges. It is what the heading says: a class action waiver."...YOU AND MICROSOFT AGREE THAT ANY PROCEEDINGS TO RESOLVE OR LITIGATE ANY DISPUTE, WHETHER IN ARBITRATION, IN COURT, OR OTHERWISE, WILL BE CONDUCTED SOLELY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS."
Or they just don't see the humor in, "Ha! Your misery delights me! Not because you deserved it, per se, but more because I was miserable and I want other people to be, too."MysticToast said:I forgot, no one on this site has a sense of humor.
I think you messed up the form link I tried hitting it to have a look but it just sends me to an Escapist page with a 404 error.WMDogma said:Newest Xbox 360 Update Prevents Class Actions Suits Against Microsoft
Users who agree to the latest Xbox 360 update's terms of services forfeit their right to sue Microsoft.
After a bit of a shaky start, the most recent Xbox 360 update has finally gone live, introducing a wide variety of massive collection [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/114524-Heres-The-Skinny-On-Microsofts-New-360-Update] of film and TV content. However, the new update does come with a somewhat devious catch.
A segment written in big, bold letters in the update's terms of service essentially state that Xbox 360 owners are forbidden from participating in any class action suits against Microsoft. Specific details can be found in console itself [http://www.xbox.com/en-US/legal/livetou] will no longer be able to involve a judge or jury.
Previous class action suits against Microsoft caused the electronics giant to own up to major problems with Xbox Live and the Xbox 360, such as extending its warranties to cover console failures caused by the infamous E74 error, AKA "Red Ring of Death." [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/90933-Microsoft-Extends-Xbox-Warranty-to-E74-Error] By requiring future disputes be handled behind closed doors, it's entirely possible that Microsoft could use this new clause to brush any problems under the rug or offer little payout to consumers who dispute any issues with its services. Most often cases involving private arbitration aren't open to the public, and there's also very little in the way of reviewing an arbitrator's decision.
billions of dollars. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/113063-Sony-Attempts-to-Block-All-Future-PSN-Class-Action-Lawsuits]
The new Xbox 360 terms of service only affect residents of the United States, so if you happen to live elsewhere in the world, you don't have anything to worry about right now. Those inside the US can file a dispute by filling out this form [www.xbox.com/notice] and mailing it in.
Source: Kotaku [http://kotaku.com/5865797/now-microsoft-wants-to-stop-you-taking-them-to-court]
Permalink
Link is broken.WMDogma said:Those inside the US can file a dispute by filling out this form [www.xbox.com/notice] and mailing it in.
Absolutionis said:People need to realize this isn't a bad thing. If something terrible happens, you can still sue. The issue is that you simply can't jump on a class-action lawsuit bandwagon where in the end you'll get $0.10 and the lawyer gets millions.
A fairly recent decision by the US Supreme Court between Wal-mart and its employees indicates otherwise. This BS won't be going away until the guys who made this ruling croak and we get people who aren't corporate puppets. I expect that the earliest we will be able to see that happen is 20 years to never...Findlebob said:Ive been waiting for this ever since EA (pronounced the same way i pronounce scum) and Sony pulled the same thing.
My only thought is that i don't think it would stand up in count. Partially because it is illegal.