get rid of Ehren Kruger who does some of the most offensive writing I've ever seen. Seriously, just get rid of these movies, they're only bad they've gone right into boring with the third one.
Are you implying the films have depth?-Samurai- said:Sure, it's the problem if you wanted the original cartoon to be remade into a set of boring two-and-a-half-hour long movies where there's only a vague plot, and absolutely zero depth.monnes said:Well that's the problem. I would have to say that a Transformers film based on Transformer toys shouldn't make the Transformers the subplot.-Samurai- said:I never understood the whole "not enough robots" complaint. The movie happens on Earth, and is about a young man that happens to discover a robot alien, and his adventures that follow. It isn't about a bunch of giant robots fighting each other. That's the sub plot
There's a reason the films are so popular, and it isn't because everyone that goes to see them is mentally handicapped. It's because they work. If people really didn't like the fact that the robots aren't constantly on screen, a second and third movie would have never been made.
That is not us. Their audience is the general movie going populace, not the geek demographic. They took something from us because it lends itself to over the top special effects and crazy explosions, but this movie is not for us and it never was from the first pitch.EverythingIncredible said:It's good to show contempt for your audience.
Okay,EverythingIncredible said:Stop trying to appeal as both a comedy movie and an action one. Because then your movie is good at neither. Just ask the people behind The Phantom Menace.
The thing is, I don't think people go to see the plot or the humor or romance.-Samurai- said:What would be the point in a studio spending millions of dollars to make an exact copy of a sub-par cartoon from the 80's?Canadish said:That's the problem people had with it.-Samurai- said:I never understood the whole "not enough robots" complaint. The movie happens on Earth, and is about a young man that happens to discover a robot alien, and his adventures that follow. It isn't about a bunch of giant robots fighting each other. That's the sub plot, and I think that it was worked into the movie well.
Having just seen Transformers 3 about an hour ago, I can safely say that I don't know where they'd go with it. The ending seemed pretty final, and I'm not sure what they could to top this one. It was freaking amazing.
The movie is called Transformers. They wanted a movie about the Transformers, and not some bratty kid who wants to get laid.
War for Cybertron and all that. That should have been written as the main plot and Sam as the side character.
That would justify the "leave your brain at the door" argument for me. Sadly I have to sit through 2 hours of fluff and awful masturbation jokes. Not worth it.
If you want the old Transformers, go watch the old Transformers. It still exists. The new movies didn't destroy the old cartoon.(Edit)[I should probably note that that wasn't directed at you, but the people that think that the movie should be what the Transformers have always been; Boring.]
In the first movie, Sam is trying to start a relationship with with someone he's had his eye on for quite some time.monnes said:Are you implying the films have depth?-Samurai- said:Sure, it's the problem if you wanted the original cartoon to be remade into a set of boring two-and-a-half-hour long movies where there's only a vague plot, and absolutely zero depth.monnes said:Well that's the problem. I would have to say that a Transformers film based on Transformer toys shouldn't make the Transformers the subplot.-Samurai- said:I never understood the whole "not enough robots" complaint. The movie happens on Earth, and is about a young man that happens to discover a robot alien, and his adventures that follow. It isn't about a bunch of giant robots fighting each other. That's the sub plot
There's a reason the films are so popular, and it isn't because everyone that goes to see them is mentally handicapped. It's because they work. If people really didn't like the fact that the robots aren't constantly on screen, a second and third movie would have never been made.
I didn't even like the original cartoon, and wasn't at all wishing for a live action remake. I also didn't want a Transformers film about bland shallow people. If you're going to make a transformers film with shallow and unrelateable characters, at least have them be the actual transformers.
That would be a valid compromise.EverythingIncredible said:I'd prefer a Transformers movie to focus on Bumblebee personally and let Optimus be a wise and charismatic leader.
That's not the problem. There are movies with that problem, but this is not one of them. The problem isn't that the comedy makes the action seem less important, or that the action makes the comedy seem stupid. The problem is that neither component was good in the first place. The humor is low brow and unfunny and obvious, and the action is a poorly filmed shaky cam nightmare that I can't even really tell what's going on in.EverythingIncredible said:That said, the reason I said that is because they don't know how to mesh them together.
There lies a problem in this and it's that producers are mostly stupid in seeing actual plot elements like Cybertron which was involved in the 3rd movie for only a few seconds of frame and then it was just destroyed like that which kinda irked me slightly and the whole unicron idea would be great and i did love Unicron in the 80's movie and the saga.koroem said:Nope. They could go into the Unicron saga. This could also lead the resurrection of Megatron as Galvatron. The Matrix of Leadership which Optimus now has in the movies was a key part of a Unicron saga. It could be reimagined for the movies.Schmittler said:Wha? What?
Where do they even go from there? They could do a prequel, but that would contradict the whole "It won't be all bots" thing. The ending seemed pretty final, does anyone else feel the same way?
Also they could introduce dark energon to the movies. Dark energon has the power to corrupt and mutate Transformers, and in a couple of plots Megatron used it to create armies or corrupt Cybertron itself. It is some pretty powerful stuff in the TF universe, and Megatron was one of the only surviving Transformers able to control it. Perhaps they could use that to bring Megatron back somehow for more.
By the third movie, people know exactly what they're getting in to. You could figure out after the first movie that it isn't 100% robots. Expecting the human plot to be dropped in favor of giant robot battles is moronic. That's not how sequels work(good ones, any way). When you go see a Transformers movie, you know you're getting a human romance/fight for survival plot, as well as the robots. And if you don't agree with that, don't go see it.Canadish said:The thing is, I don't think people go to see the plot or the humor or romance.
They go to see the giant robots.
From original 80's cartoon nerds, to working class redneck American girls and all the way to guys living in small Malaysian towns on the border of the jungle. Giant Robots kinda have a worldwide appeal.
As you guessed, I'm no fan of the original cartoons, but I'd rather see Optimus Prime characterized as opposed to the humans. That would give his battles at the end more weight. The aliens are more interesting to learn about here, because they bring a different perspective to the table, and don't pander to one culture (America, fuck yeah and all that...)
Now, this debate we're having here is all pretty moot at the moment.
Even if the films HAD been about the robots, they would have sucked, because Michel Bay, and the writers for Transformers are all awful at characterization and pacing.
But at least we could have just kept looking at pretty robots.
If a competent film maker and team were behind the wheel, I'd be fine with a focus on the humans, because they would know how to make them interesting and less offensive to my intelligence. So who knows, these new movies may rock.
Making a new Indiana Jones movie with Harrison Ford looking older than most of the artifact made Indiana Jones seem uncool. That wasn't really Shwarza The Beef's fault but you know... he was there.gamezombieghgh said:Wait, Shia Labeouf made Indiana Jones seem uncool? is this what people think?