uhhhh, the top screen isnt a touch screen in the regular 3ds, only the bottom is, and im pretty sure thats the same for all DS consoles. theres also no point in making it touch as no games would use it and its just meant to be a new version of the 3ds.Drauger said:I just don't get this thing, the 2ds emulates a dual screen but in fact it has only one touch screen, nintendo actually aded an plastic protect screen so the top "screen" isn't "touchable", why cripple your hardware, nintendo should have just made this the nintendo tablet or something it would have been better than this piece of cheap crapsubtlefuge said:$130 makes for a really cheap and durable kid's tablet that can play Pokemon and Mario, so it seems like a no-brainer.
OT why are people angry about this? there is a 3ds already that isnt that much more expensive at all that has the same function
Can i ask (as someone who has only recently brought his 3ds) is this a common occurance, the hinges wearing out quickly or did he just take really bad care of it?AngelOfBlueRoses said:I know this is anecdotal evidence, but I'm going to give it anyways. My younger siblings are 11 and 13 right now, but have had DS' since the age of 7 and 8, respectively. Since then, my brother (11) has gone through three DS' and my sister (13) has gone through 1 because they've broken off the hinges. The 3DS' that they have, at least my brother's, is also starting to loosen. I won't be surprised if he manages to snap one off by Christmas.slash2x said:Snip.
Until those hinges are made of stronger stuff, it's fine if they're targeting the younger crowd with a hinge-less DS.