Nintendo Controllers Face U.S. Ban

Dramus

New member
Jul 12, 2008
122
0
0
Well, as it's been said before, lawsuits take a long time. And there's some misinformation here. Although you can patent basic hardware (and as people don't realize, the idea of a game console was owned by Magnavox for the longest time, I think it still is) you cannot patent a genre, so any attempt to patent a block puzzle game would end in failure. There's also a reason for allowing ideas to be patented before the product. Ralf Bear had the idea for a game console in the 60's, and started working on it then. Even though Atari beat them to the punch by a few months with Pong, Magnavox still successfully sued them because A) Pong was a blatant rip off of one of their games, Nolan Bushnell was proved to have seen it, and B) because Patents are awarded based on who had the idea first, not who made it. Which means that you can't patent something that's already out unless you can prove that you came up with it before it was released.
 
Jun 11, 2008
15
0
0
Ibuki said:
Still, shows the kind of ethics the company runs on.
sadly seems like , for a while now, America is known for sue happy citizens
thikig they can ge rich.

For example (slightly off topic) a robber brok into a familys house,
and their dog attack him causing him to be cuaght. He tuns
around and sues h family for his injuries from the dog, and the bail money
he had to pay to get out of holding.
I do law and that is a case example in English law. If the family had put up a sign saying beware of the dangerous dog somewhere where the robber could reasonable be expected to see it then they would have been ok =/
 

stompy

New member
Jan 21, 2008
2,951
0
0
Argh, you Yanks really do need to amend your patent process. Seriously, this is a waste of Nintendo's time and money, and I really think the judge allowing the case to continue needs to rethink the case.