Those are nice numbers, Nintendo. Nice numbers indeed. Sorry, VR...you aren't wooing this casual asshole anytime soon.
Okay nevermind, I've now seen the presentation for myself.MetalheroDamien said:I'm not sure what console you were looking at, but the one they showed clearly had at least two different sets of them, Although to be fair they are mutually exclusive (one set on the "top" of the individual controller, with another set on the "side", to use when holding it sideways, like an NES controller.)Hiddelgreyk said:Wait HUH? They don't have those?Naldan said:trigger buttons? 2nd L + R shoulder buttons? You know, to port stuff over more easily. Have also to say that trigger buttons simply are amazing and IMO necessary nowadays. Not just for porting-reasons.
Are you absolutely sure?
Even as a huge Fanboy, I have to ask: "Why, Nintendo? Were the designers high or something? For fuck's sake, even your very own 3DS has those now! (In theory. I don't know how successful the >New< 3DS is.)"
I'd rather have a sequel to Xenoblade X (also I'm not done with Xenoblade Chronicles for the Wii yet)drkchmst said:Of course they had to lay out bait. Xc2 which I was hoping would just turn out being xcx and a new smt, luckily smt will likely be over a year before released in the US. I sure don't like the price and feel it's a huge ripoff for what you get. We'll see. Not buying at launch. I refuse.
Forgetting about The Virtual Boy there?hentropy said:What is this proven formula you speak of? I'm sure Nintendo execs would like to know. People aren't going to buy a PS4/Xbone with Nintendo branded on the front, it became clear during the Gamecube era that it was a different market, hence why they went with the Wii, which was more of a success, for sure. The Wii U is probably the only console of theirs which could be considered a "failure" (depending on how one defines the term).SlumlordThanatos said:It looks to me like Nintendo is stubbornly refusing to use the proven formula, hoping that the Wii lightning strikes again.
I think their goal in this one is to combine some of the novelty and differences with the Wii with a more straightforward game console. The only question will be whether or not they try to replace their handhelds with this thing. With a crappy battery life, that would be unwelcome news for me.
Everybody forgets about the Virtual BoyMetalheroDamien said:Forgetting about The Virtual Boy there?hentropy said:What is this proven formula you speak of? I'm sure Nintendo execs would like to know. People aren't going to buy a PS4/Xbone with Nintendo branded on the front, it became clear during the Gamecube era that it was a different market, hence why they went with the Wii, which was more of a success, for sure. The Wii U is probably the only console of theirs which could be considered a "failure" (depending on how one defines the term).SlumlordThanatos said:It looks to me like Nintendo is stubbornly refusing to use the proven formula, hoping that the Wii lightning strikes again.
I think their goal in this one is to combine some of the novelty and differences with the Wii with a more straightforward game console. The only question will be whether or not they try to replace their handhelds with this thing. With a crappy battery life, that would be unwelcome news for me.
ps2 was definitely an oddity in the console market. it is the best selling console in the history and was still being made after 15 years. and as we saw with the xbox you can compete with sony. the first Xbox wasn't a complete failure but it didnt perform great either. but as we saw the 360 was a huge success for MS. my point is that imo nintendo gave up too soon. I think nintendo got lucky with the Wii and thought they could bring out the next great thing again.hentropy said:What is this proven formula you speak of? I'm sure Nintendo execs would like to know. People aren't going to buy a PS4/Xbone with Nintendo branded on the front, it became clear during the Gamecube era that it was a different market, hence why they went with the Wii, which was more of a success, for sure. The Wii U is probably the only console of theirs which could be considered a "failure" (depending on how one defines the term).
The PS2 was so successful partially because its historically big library, many of which were exclusives for the PS2. That number of games, along with that kind of exclusive culture, is likely never going to be repeated again. I don't think it's crazy to suggest that Nintendo would have a hard time competing if they just tried to make limited-use PCs like the other consoles.sagitel said:ps2 was definitely an oddity in the console market. it is the best selling console in the history and was still being made after 15 years. and as we saw with the xbox you can compete with sony. the first Xbox wasn't a complete failure but it didnt perform great either. but as we saw the 360 was a huge success for MS. my point is that imo nintendo gave up too soon. I think nintendo got lucky with the Wii and thought they could bring out the next great thing again.
Yeah, it's going to sell terribly over here. You can buy a PS4 and a game or two for less. An XB1 is even cheaper. The accessories are also overpriced.cathou said:and this thing is 399$ in canada. 460$ with sale taxes
I'm very sure... OK, I'll check once more... ... ... oh, holy shit. They do have trigger buttons. What the hell, I had my eye-balls glued on the monitor yesterday and I was convinced, that... oh man.Hiddelgreyk said:Wait HUH? They don't have those?
Are you absolutely sure?
Even as a huge Fanboy, I have to ask: "Why, Nintendo? Were the designers high or something? For fuck's sake, even your very own 3DS has those now! (In theory. I don't know how successful the >New< 3DS is.)"
Pfff