samsonguy920 has it right. So far, it appears that EULAs[footnote]Note, no apostrophe on plurals, even with numbers and acronyms. Apostrophe only on possessives and skipped letters.[/footnote] have only seen enforcement between corporations, and when regarding copyright laws. We've not yet seen cases between companies and consumers.samsonguy920 said:Only when actual federal or state laws apply. As of this time, EULA's and TOA's are not legal documents and not enforceable in any court. To get them enforced EA would have to send you an actual contract to sign with legal witness to hold it up.Venereus said:Now, EA's ToS clearly states that when EA terminates your account there's no refund. So, when it comes to digital distribution, or any other form of distribution where you can't return the game and playing requires "dialing home", the publisher can cancel their part of the deal, but you can't...Is this legal?
That would be a lot of legal bills.
Of course, in order for a consumer to see justice, one might have to sue and fight a mean unkindness of lawyers.[footnote]Murder of lawyers? Parliament of lawyers? Betrayal of lawyers? Slaughter of lawyers?[/footnote], and these companies count on the cost and intimidation that comes with having one's day in court. If you're lucky, activist organizations might fuel your defense in order to set some end-user friendly precedents.
The whole point of this thread and this affair is the fact that contemporary DRM schemes have instilled in the companies a lot of power, and the responsibility to use this power only for the purpose for which they hold it, namely, they can stop you from playing if they have strong cause to believe you are an unlicensed user, and no other.
If you pirate their game, EA can deny you access to that game.
If you complain about EA's DRM, that doesn't justify them killing your license.
If you troll their forums, they still let you play.
If you make crank calls to their tech-support, nope: you still get to play.
If you draw mustaches on the EA logo and post them on 4Chan...that's right. You still get to play their games.
Only if they think you're pirating their game (and have just cause to do so) can they cut your gameplay.
Only.
Once that changes, for any reason, it not only proves that EA cannot be trusted with that level DRM, but that no company can be trusted, since, y'know, EA might buy them out, or the iron-fisted CEO may move to a new company and enforce his dickish policies there. It would mean that Microsoft cannot be trusted with the Vista / Windows 7 kill switches they currently hold.
Which is why I genuinely think EA never came across this as a problem (namely someone being blocked from activating or playing, due to a forum moderation) before, and their webmasters have just realized that forum status and account status need to be separated...and maybe (hopefully) lighter penalties for moderator action enabled (e.g. probation, suspended from thread, etc.)
I suspect also, that it is only because it caused such a ruckus that they responded so quickly, but this is still progress.