No matter how open-minded...

Recommended Videos

cgaWolf

New member
Apr 16, 2009
125
0
0
summerof2010 said:
The whole point of my "fetch" analogy was that dogs don't usually require consent for you to be able to do things with them, or even to use them for things (think work horses). It seems to me that you are making an arbitrary distinction by saying that sexual activity always requires consent to be morally permissible, where other types of activity do not. If you think it's not arbitrary, then what is the relevant distinction? What about sex requires that the animal be able to give consent?

Just because you don't buy the consent argument, doesn't make it any less valid ^_^

That said, simply because we tolerate one form of abuse (work animals, slaughtering them for food) does not automatically validate other forms of abuse, and while the distinction made is arbitrary, it's not a moral one: informed consent / abuse of power pertains to the legality of the act, not the morality of it.
 

Whit

New member
Jan 25, 2010
31
0
0
cgaWolf said:
theemporer said:
The alleged lack of morality is not entirely misplaced, however, as the belief that there is no spiritual power also implies no immortal Moral Law, meaning that, to an atheist, morality has no meaning beyond what they are or are not punished for.

I mean no offence, but I personally can't understand how atheists can be so hypocritical. Atheists often claim that those who are religious are being illogical. Yet, when taking an "objective" viewpoint, atheists assume that religion must be false, without any concrete proof either way.
If you assert the existence of something, the burden of proof is on you, not on the sceptic.
At this point, the discussion usually diverges, as the faithful argue on the philosophical level for the existence of a god, while being unable to prove his existence on a physical level - whereas the materialist (that many atheists are) requires to accept the proposition that a god exists.

The problem here is that one posits the existence of an (omnipotent, omniscient & omnibenevolent) being that is clearly outside the realm of nature, whereas the other requires a natural proof as he refuses that things outside his physical reality have or should have an impact on him.

The discussion can't even agree on the same topic, which makes science & faith not be direct opposites, but very compatible, provided faith takes a step back when science proves something in the natural world. The refusal to accept logic as it pertains to natural facts or the models we build to explain them is ununderstandable for someone firmly rooted in the scientific method; thus the statament that faithful are illogical.


All that said, i refuse your implication that the lack of an immortal moral law means atheists are morally bankrupt. We see intrinsic value in good deeds, and there are humanist and social-evolutionary reasons why "doing good" is worth doing. In contrast, the refusal of an immortal moral law absolves me of having to push it unto someone else who may not share those laws or beliefs, and that is A Good Thing!

That evangelical behaviour of religious people is the root of many evils committed by faithful. The opinion that my, and only my, belief is the One Truth, is one of the most damaging ideas ever known to mankind - regardless of whether it's rooted in faith, though it usually is.

Most churches have their own version of extra ecclesiam nulla salus - that dogma that my faith is The One True Faith is the cause and justification for all evil done by good men of faith; and that is the true crime of religions against humanity: It makes good people do bad things.
Very good points, I'd just like to reiterate that morals are just as easily derived from philosophy as they are from religion. And, in addition, religious moral codes are frequently self-contradictory, ex: the Old Testament tells you that you have to stone homosexuals, yet Jesus tells his followers "let he who is without sin cast the first stone", so, what's the good Christian supposed to believe? The son of God, or the word of God?

Also, the religious tend to ignore rules they just don't want to follow. When asked why it's ok for Christians to eat shellfish, Christians will explain that this rule doesn't really apply because it's from the Old Testament, specifically, Leviticus, guess which book of the Old Testament is the one that Christians will cite when explaining why homosexuality is "wrong", it's Leviticus. So basically, when it's a rule they don't want to follow, it doesn't count 'cause it's Old Testament, but when they do want to follow it, it doesn't matter where it came from.
 

putowtin

I'd like to purchase an alcohol!
Jul 7, 2010
3,449
0
0
Whit said:
putowtin said:
how a McDonald's burger can be classed as a burger when it has nothing but cardboard in it?
what about how pizza is legally a vegetable in the U.S. now, in spite of the fact that of the 3 primary pizza ingredients the closest you can find to a veggie is the tomato paste, which comes from a FRUIT.
I don't know if to laugh or cry, so instead I'm gonna curl up in the corner and hope the world goes away!
 
Mar 5, 2011
690
0
0
Deviate said:
Religion. I can't wrap my head around willful delusions like that. Yes, I know it's not the popular stance to take, nor politically correct, but I just can't look at any of the religions I know and figure out why people believe in it. It's got the same factual weight as santa claus and makes about as much sense from any logical perspective and yet these religions are not only widespread beliefs but it's political and at times even social suicide to speak against them.

It's mindboggling to me. There's no scientifically backed indication of any of it having even a nugget of truth to it and yet it's 'narrowminded' or 'hateful' to point out the ridiculousness of it all.

I'll of course respect anyone's right to believe in these things, but the most aneurysm inducing part of it all is that there's no respect given to those who believe religion holds about as much water as a sieve.
I don't understand why people display there views on religion all over the place. It's nice to have them but don't go whipping em out.
 

Peter Croft

New member
Jul 14, 2011
14
0
0
Me? I don't get the occupy movement.
I understand that the gap between poor/rich people is bad but the movement has no clear goals and quite frankly seems like a waste of otherwise decent people's time.
 

Mau95

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2011
347
0
21
Soods said:
German grammar...
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!

Edit: So many people saying they can't understand religious people. Here is a slightly logical answer:
If [insert deity here] does exist: you will go to heaven or be reborn as a cow or something.
If it doesn't exist: doesn't matter now that you're dead, does it?
German grammar makes total sense, although it depends on where you're from.

The people that dont get religious people: where are you from? Most religious people I know are alright, rly.

I dont get some weird fetishes.
 

Balodal

New member
Dec 1, 2011
3
0
0
Mau95 said:
Soods said:
German grammar...
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!

Edit: So many people saying they can't understand religious people. Here is a slightly logical answer:
If [insert deity here] does exist: you will go to heaven or be reborn as a cow or something.
If it doesn't exist: doesn't matter now that you're dead, does it?
German grammar makes total sense, although it depends on where you're from.

The people that dont get religious people: where are you from? Most religious people I know are alright, rly.

I dont get some weird fetishes.
German grammar makes sense, but it's pretty damn complicated compared to other languages
 

Mau95

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2011
347
0
21
Balodal said:
Mau95 said:
Soods said:
German grammar...
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!

Edit: So many people saying they can't understand religious people. Here is a slightly logical answer:
If [insert deity here] does exist: you will go to heaven or be reborn as a cow or something.
If it doesn't exist: doesn't matter now that you're dead, does it?
German grammar makes total sense, although it depends on where you're from.

The people that dont get religious people: where are you from? Most religious people I know are alright, rly.

I dont get some weird fetishes.
German grammar makes sense, but it's pretty damn complicated compared to other languages
Ever tried to learn Dutch? My first language, and German is rather similar.
 

Balodal

New member
Dec 1, 2011
3
0
0
Mau95 said:
Balodal said:
Mau95 said:
Soods said:
German grammar...
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!

Edit: So many people saying they can't understand religious people. Here is a slightly logical answer:
If [insert deity here] does exist: you will go to heaven or be reborn as a cow or something.
If it doesn't exist: doesn't matter now that you're dead, does it?
German grammar makes total sense, although it depends on where you're from.

The people that dont get religious people: where are you from? Most religious people I know are alright, rly.

I dont get some weird fetishes.
German grammar makes sense, but it's pretty damn complicated compared to other languages
Ever tried to learn Dutch? My first language, and German is rather similar.
German is my first languague. I know how it works, but you have to admit it's way more complicated than some other languagues. :D
 

Avalanche91

New member
Jan 8, 2009
604
0
0
Religious extremism. I just don't......how......why......

Also American Politics........really? REALLY? One of our newspapers literally had a article about the people currently running for president and titled it something that roughly translates to; 'the idiot list'.
 

ZeroMachine

New member
Oct 11, 2008
4,397
0
0
Durgiun said:
For the life of me, I'll never understand people who see 2001: A Space Odyssey as THE greatest movie of all time.
I'll agree with that one.

But for me, I'm far more confused as to how anyone could make the conscious decision to smoke cigarettes. It smells gross and is drastically bad for your health. I mean... ew. Just, blech. I'll never get it.

Necron_warrior said:
I don't understand people who do things 'out of the goodness of their heart'. There's no profit for the doer, unless the doer has the ideas of favours in mind, it just seems illogical to me.
Some people, myself included, just feel good when we're nice to people. So I guess you could argue, if you decide to work on cold, hard logic only, that we do it for self gratification.

But in reality, we're just nice.
 

Shadowmech88

New member
Dec 9, 2011
2
0
0
I dislike illogical and irrational people, rap music, people who wear gauges, people who say "like" between every other word, & people who abbreviate or misspell just because they're lazy.
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,779
0
0
I just can't understand people who get excited to screaming fever-pitch over sports. I really fail to grasp the excitement of sports in general.

I mean I get worked up and really into professional wrestling, but that's more like a TV show because it pretty much is. And because they have characters and people you can actually get behind. Football is just 11 people from a city or country you like or are from kicking a ball around on a pitch somewhere, it just isn't the same thing.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,172
150
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
I'll never understand people who dislike or hate children, I can understand that some people feel awkward around them because of lack of experience and/or social skills but those who down-right do not like? Seems to me to go against natural biology though it is often something people will grow out of as they mature. Also those who are against family values in general and chase money/hedonistic pleasures, never understood why possessions are so important to some people.
 

Soods

New member
Jan 6, 2010
608
0
0
Mau95 said:
Soods said:
German grammar...
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!

Edit: So many people saying they can't understand religious people. Here is a slightly logical answer:
If [insert deity here] does exist: you will go to heaven or be reborn as a cow or something.
If it doesn't exist: doesn't matter now that you're dead, does it?
German grammar makes total sense, although it depends on where you're from.
Ok, it does make sense, but the endless lists of exceptions make it hard to grasp.
 

Davroth

The shadow remains cast!
Apr 27, 2011
678
0
0
I can't wrap my head around how people can still take politicians at face value. You'd think centuries of lies and deception would teach us something, but nope!

Now, I didn't read all of this thread and maybe it has been covered already, but although I'm not religious in the slightest, I do understand why people seek the comfort of religion.
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,779
0
0
poiumty said:
ReservoirAngel said:
I just can't understand people who get excited to screaming fever-pitch over sports. I really fail to grasp the excitement of sports in general.

I mean I get worked up and really into professional wrestling, but that's more like a TV show because it pretty much is. And because they have characters and people you can actually get behind. Football is just 11 people from a city or country you like or are from kicking a ball around on a pitch somewhere, it just isn't the same thing.
Football has strict rules and requires teamwork, and strategy on part of the manager. It has a skill cap that is more or less unreachable, and people dedicate their lives to it. Don't just look at the ball. Look behind the scenes. If you've ever gotten excited over a Starcraft match, you're completely elligible to understand football. Hell, if you've ever enjoyed an FPS frag movie as a display of skill, you're elligible to understand football.
Same can be said for other sports.
People get excited over Starcraft matches? Playing them I could maybe understand, but watching them? Who gets excited watching other people play strategy games?