You looking at it totally backwards. thebobmaster is not saying that the PS3 shouldn't have the patch. Quite the opposite, that they both should have the patch no matter what the circumstances are.Foolproof said:Thats just spite, pure and simple. You're being selfish and saying if you can't have it, nobody should. Other people having the patch doesn't hurt you in any way, so saying they should be deprived of something so you can't have it either is just pure childish spite. This is how a 3 year old views the world.thebobmaster said:Regardless of Microsoft's part in this (that can be debated for days), this is still a bullshit stance for a company to make. You can't fix one version of the game, then tell people who bought the other version that they are screwed. I would be a bit more understanding if they felt a need to not patch the game on any system. I'd still be irritated, but I'd accept it.
But this is just showing favoritism towards one system over the other, and strikes me as being rather unprofessional. It's not the fact that they aren't patching the 360 version in and of itself. It's the fact that they are refusing to patch the 360 version, after having already patched the PS3 version.
You think exclusive content is bad? How about exclusive patches?
Yes, absolutely. The Xbox version of Silent Hill 2 is a straight up port of the PS2 Directors Cut version and includes an additional scenario for one of the characters.ForgottenPr0digy said:what about the xbox port of silent hill 2? Is that any good?Proverbial Jon said:Silent Hill is really the last franchise that needs to be in HD. The gritty, grainy, low res nature of it's graphics only adds to the atmosphere.
Stick with your original PS2 versions guys, there's absolutely no reason to buy this "collection" and there never has been.
EDIT: Also, I'm totally fed up with that "There was a HOLE here. It's gone now" picture being in EVERY Escapist news post about Silent Hill.
You're right. It doesn't hurt me, because I didn't buy the game. You know who it does hurt? Every single person who bought it on the 360. I'm assuming you either don't own it, or you have the PS3 version.Foolproof said:Thats just spite, pure and simple. You're being selfish and saying if you can't have it, nobody should. Other people having the patch doesn't hurt you in any way, so saying they should be deprived of something so you can't have it either is just pure childish spite. This is how a 3 year old views the world.thebobmaster said:Regardless of Microsoft's part in this (that can be debated for days), this is still a bullshit stance for a company to make. You can't fix one version of the game, then tell people who bought the other version that they are screwed. I would be a bit more understanding if they felt a need to not patch the game on any system. I'd still be irritated, but I'd accept it.
But this is just showing favoritism towards one system over the other, and strikes me as being rather unprofessional. It's not the fact that they aren't patching the 360 version in and of itself. It's the fact that they are refusing to patch the 360 version, after having already patched the PS3 version.
You think exclusive content is bad? How about exclusive patches?
I'm sorry but you are a complete idiot.Foolproof said:But the 360 fix isn't going to happen, okay? Stop acting like denying the patch to 360 owners is them deliberately spiting them. We are starting from a position of "there will be no patch for the 360 version". All thebobmaster is doing is denying that anyone get a patch out of some warped view of fairness.Baldr said:You looking at it totally backwards. thebobmaster is not saying that the PS3 shouldn't have the patch. Quite the opposite, that they both should have the patch no matter what the circumstances are.Foolproof said:Thats just spite, pure and simple. You're being selfish and saying if you can't have it, nobody should. Other people having the patch doesn't hurt you in any way, so saying they should be deprived of something so you can't have it either is just pure childish spite. This is how a 3 year old views the world.thebobmaster said:Regardless of Microsoft's part in this (that can be debated for days), this is still a bullshit stance for a company to make. You can't fix one version of the game, then tell people who bought the other version that they are screwed. I would be a bit more understanding if they felt a need to not patch the game on any system. I'd still be irritated, but I'd accept it.
But this is just showing favoritism towards one system over the other, and strikes me as being rather unprofessional. It's not the fact that they aren't patching the 360 version in and of itself. It's the fact that they are refusing to patch the 360 version, after having already patched the PS3 version.
You think exclusive content is bad? How about exclusive patches?