Bleh I rather Johna Dark somewhere there.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Erm... why isn't this Samus vs Lara Croft?
Bleh I rather Johna Dark somewhere there.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Erm... why isn't this Samus vs Lara Croft?
Atleast in HotS Kerrigan isn't an antagonist anymore. One way or the other she's more of a lead character then those mentioned.Saelune said:I didnt know antagonists count as leads. Cause to me they dont. (Kerrigan and Kreia are antagonists in the end).
Wait what? So because the reason for her being a strong character is not that she's a woman, she's not a strong woman character? I don't think I agree there.RJ 17 said:This is why I don't get why people are saying she's a "strong female character". As you say, her "independence" comes from the fact that she's been zergified, not because she's a woman standing on her own. Her story arc would fit just as easily to a male as it would for a female.Delcast said:Her independence comes more from her alien-hood than her womanhood.
have you per chance recently watched Conan O'Brien's review of said game?Ukomba said:Laura - Tomb Raider
Hey Mikeyfell,Mikeyfell said:Dear No Right Answer:
Please learn what a "lead character" is.
Ellie and Elizabeth are both supporting rolls,
Their participation in the plot is either passive or forced upon them.
Ellie is the lead for two chapters of Last of Us.
But for the most part it's Joel and Booker actively driving the plot while Ellie and Elizabeth follow and provide...Support.
Best female character, sure those are worthy choices, but they aren't lead.
Asides from two brief scenes Ellie doesn't drive the plot (Her condition does, but that's passive)
Clementine from Walking Dead is a better "Lead" character because her motivation is the only thing driving Lee to do the plot.
Joel and Booker would be doing this whether or not Ellie and Elizabeth had anything to do about it.
Not yet, and I haven't played the latest Tomb Raider yet myself (My Steam Backlog is getting ridiculous).Delerien said:Edit:
have you per chance recently watched Conan O'Brien's review of said game?Ukomba said:Laura - Tomb Raider
Kerrigan is an anti-villain at most in Heart of the Swarm, and yes, a lead can be a villain. A lead is simply whoever the action is centered upon, a person from whose perspective we see things.Saelune said:I didnt know antagonists count as leads. Cause to me they dont. (Kerrigan and Kreia are antagonists in the end).
Samus was mine along with many others the nnumber one choice. She is cool and actually the lead in her games. Chell, though cool, is essentially just the player, so I dont really count her.
She has quite a few strong character-tropes instead of being just 'powerful'. She's cunning, smart, tenacious, independent, etc.RJ 17 said:This is why I don't get why people are saying she's a "strong female character". As you say, her "independence" comes from the fact that she's been zergified, not because she's a woman standing on her own. Her story arc would fit just as easily to a male as it would for a female. Character starts as a loyal soldier, character gets viciously betrayed and left to a horrific fate, character gains untold amounts of power, character uses that power to seek revenge on those that betrayed her. Upon getting said revenge, character fully embraces the darkness inherent in their power and decides she wants to become the evil overlord of the galaxy.Delcast said:Her independence comes more from her alien-hood than her womanhood.
She doesn't change the Zerg when she takes over, she rather just fully embraces her role as the leader of the Zerg. Once the Overmind has been dealt with, she basically just wants to take its place as the ruler of the Zerg and go on to accomplish what the Overmind was already trying to do: consume and assimilate everything. As I said, you could just as easily stick a male into that role and the story wouldn't change at all. With a character like Ellie, you could stick a little boy into her role and suddenly it becomes an entirely different story. It goes from being a story of innocence lost to being a "how to become a man" story. Same thing with Elizabeth, if you slap a young man into her role, he'd likely be blasting away with a shotgun side-by-side with Booker as they try to break out of Columbia.
Kerrigan is only a "strong female character" in the sense that she's a female that's obscenely powerful. She doesn't really "advance the cause" in any way, shape, or form other than saying "Hey check it out! Our main bad-guy is actually a girl!" The concept of a powerful villainess, however, is certainly nothing new or unique to the universe of StarCraft.
As for the episode itself:
RIIIIIGGED! You just wanted Hermon to win because he was a guest on the show! You start out by giving him one sentence on his first turn resulting in no points, then give him two points in another turn in which he didn't even make two good points, then just edit out him drinking so that he gets to win the drinking round! I call shenanigans!
Well considering their roles in their respective games "Strongest Female Video Game Deuteragonist" probably have been good for those two. But whatever.Firefilm said:Hey Mikeyfell,Mikeyfell said:What this person said.
An arguement can be made that these two characters are "Co-Leads" in their respective games. Even though the player only controls Ellie for a portion of the game, and only interacts with Elizabeth instead of playing her, the two ladies seem to transcend the traditional "Support" role.
That's just our opinion though, and when we used the term "Lead" we were referring to the plot, not the gameplay. Yes, Elizabeth is an NPC, and Ellie isn't played very long, but plot-wise they are just as much if not more a driving force in the story than their male companions.
Perhaps a better title would be "Strongest Female Video Game Protagonist", though I'm sure that would still cause debate. It's all in good fun, though, and I hope you enjoyed the video.