No Single Player for Command and Conquer: Generals 2

Recommended Videos

Scorpid

New member
Jul 24, 2011
814
0
0

THIS GUY AND HIS STORY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO HELP THE C&C FRANCHISE!? Have you gone completely mental EA/Bioware? In the RTS market Kane is without a doubt its most recognizable face... sigh. I know that the Generals franchise isn't the same as the main franchise but to say Command and Conquers early success has nothing to do with Kane and his cheesy plots is like saying Mario and Princess Peach aren't integral to the success of the Mario franchise. People might love the platforming but it's not why they stayed. There have been many other Mario pretenders out there some no doubt with better gameplay but people like Mario and Princess peach and the world they live in...
 

Roofstone

New member
May 13, 2010
1,641
0
0
Ldude893 said:
Hang on a second, I need to step out for a moment.

*steps outside. Cue incoherent and inaudible screaming and swearing*
Join me! As I run to the forest, away from this madness we call society! To the woods, where madness like this can't happen! And to shout at animals.. Because god DAMNIT this pisses me off. :mad:
 

gibboss28

New member
Feb 2, 2008
1,715
0
0
Well no shit, I wasn't expecting it to have a single player. Especially after the news that it would be a F2P multiplayer game, who was?
 

One of Many

New member
Feb 3, 2010
331
0
0
Excuse me, I need to smash my forehead against a cement wall until the urge to repeated stab John Van Caneghem in the stomach with a blunt, rusty piece of steel fades away.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,418
0
0
evilneko said:
Isn't Generals the one that absofuckinlutely sucked anyway? The one with shittier AI than any previous C&C game and indeed possibly any previous RTT ever?

Y'know, the one no one would've bought anyway?
The fanbase is completely broken. Asking the C&C official forum which C&C game was best is like asking Pokemon fans which generation was best.
 

GenericAmerican

New member
Dec 27, 2009
635
0
0
Back to roots? I don't' seem to remember ever playing a single online match for the First C&C Generals. . .

Well, this completely dropped off my "might be worth a look" list.
 

mattttherman3

New member
Dec 16, 2008
3,105
0
0
I predict this game flops. No, I guarentee it. Sorry but even MMO's let you do quests alone. There is no excuse for this. BioWare is known for single player so you really are not playing to their talents...
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,418
0
0
Ickabod said:
Activision killed Blizzard
EA is killing Bioware
Oh great, another one.

It is NOT Bioware developing Genrals 2.

The studio was renamed Bioware Victory after the formal announcement of Generals 2 at the Spike VGA's last year.
 

MortisLegio

New member
Nov 5, 2008
1,258
0
0
Here's a view of EA headquaters


OT:Really? EA are you that stupid... Wait that would just be an insult to stupid people. Why would you do this? The fans aren't going to be happy with it. Newcomers aren't going to be happy with it. EA, you need medication or something.
 

Jinjer

New member
Jun 16, 2012
127
0
0
Well, here's to EA raping yet another childhood favorite. Srsly, RTS without single player? I only played RTS multi at a few LAN parties back in high school - I have no interest in playing online with a bunch of strangers.

I'd rather they make an old-fashioned C&C game that I need to pay for than a multiplayer fuckup that is name-only with what I once loved and free.

Skirmishes *grumbles* What's next, the C&C FPS?
 

Karelwolfpup

New member
Jul 5, 2012
99
0
0
Wow... mulitplayer is somehow the staple of C&C? not when I got my first C&C game it wasn't.

I didn't mind Generals that much, multiplayer could be fun against people but the learning curve was tough. When it came to Red Alert 3 however... Jesus... too many options for unit abilities and how to use them.

I dunno, I might give Generals 2 a bash but... eh... wary of it tbh
 

Karelwolfpup

New member
Jul 5, 2012
99
0
0
Jinjer said:
Well, here's to EA raping yet another childhood favorite. Srsly, RTS without single player? I only played RTS multi at a few LAN parties back in high school - I have no interest in playing online with a bunch of strangers.

I'd rather they make an old-fashioned C&C game that I need to pay for than a multiplayer fuckup that is name-only with what I once loved and free.

Skirmishes *grumbles* What's next, the C&C FPS?
You mean C&C Renegade?
 

Jinjer

New member
Jun 16, 2012
127
0
0
Karelwolfpup said:
Jinjer said:
Well, here's to EA raping yet another childhood favorite. Srsly, RTS without single player? I only played RTS multi at a few LAN parties back in high school - I have no interest in playing online with a bunch of strangers.

I'd rather they make an old-fashioned C&C game that I need to pay for than a multiplayer fuckup that is name-only with what I once loved and free.

Skirmishes *grumbles* What's next, the C&C FPS?
You mean C&C Renegade?
*looks it up* Well look at that. I only ever payed attention to the RTSs
 

Karelwolfpup

New member
Jul 5, 2012
99
0
0
Jinjer said:
Karelwolfpup said:
Jinjer said:
Well, here's to EA raping yet another childhood favorite. Srsly, RTS without single player? I only played RTS multi at a few LAN parties back in high school - I have no interest in playing online with a bunch of strangers.

I'd rather they make an old-fashioned C&C game that I need to pay for than a multiplayer fuckup that is name-only with what I once loved and free.

Skirmishes *grumbles* What's next, the C&C FPS?
You mean C&C Renegade?
*looks it up* Well look at that. I only ever payed attention to the RTSs
trust me, there's a reason it flew under your radar XDD twas not impressive by any means.
 

Jinjer

New member
Jun 16, 2012
127
0
0
Karelwolfpup said:
Jinjer said:
Karelwolfpup said:
Jinjer said:
Well, here's to EA raping yet another childhood favorite. Srsly, RTS without single player? I only played RTS multi at a few LAN parties back in high school - I have no interest in playing online with a bunch of strangers.

I'd rather they make an old-fashioned C&C game that I need to pay for than a multiplayer fuckup that is name-only with what I once loved and free.

Skirmishes *grumbles* What's next, the C&C FPS?
You mean C&C Renegade?
*looks it up* Well look at that. I only ever payed attention to the RTSs
trust me, there's a reason it flew under your radar XDD twas not impressive by any means.
FPS are of little interest to me in general. Your comment just saves me the trouble of checking it out anyway :p
 

Karelwolfpup

New member
Jul 5, 2012
99
0
0
Jinjer said:
FPS are of little interest to me in general. Your comment just caves me the trouble of checking it out anyway :p
Glad I saved you the time and heartbreak then XDD ^w^
 

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
What is up with people and e-sports right now? First black ops 2 and now this. Since when was tournaments and prizes the thing that sold copies?
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
loa said:
This is NOT "EA's popular modern warfare RTS franchise", it's Westwood who made it big, made the name mean something.
The buffoons at EA (and somehow bioware is now involved in c&c too...) just shit all over it.
Actually, EA developed the spin-off C&C generals...So, EA are screwing over their own game. Funny.