violent, hell yes, the way you seem to cling on to gun rights, shooting after shooting.
but it not the worst preconception i have of America
but it not the worst preconception i have of America
Well, kids learn from their parents!MorphBallBomb said:We are an empire. We do want to rule the world. We do want you think we are that crazy because yes we are crazy.
Unless you are the secret monarch of the USA who rules behind the scenes and the rest of your class was part of your high council, then that guy is a twat and had no right to speak to you like that.Sniper Team 4 said:I went to London once (I'm from the U.S.A) and I ran into this. We were all having tea and this random stranger came up to our school group and just chewed us out. Said our country was ruining the world, we're too obsessed with bombing anything or anyone we don't like, and just a whole bunch of that stuff.
I'm gonna have to disagree with some points here. You sort of sound like a guy who believes in American exceptionalism (I sort of do too).Therumancer said:SNIP)
Well nuts. I'm afraid we have to...take care of you now. You know too much. I'm sorry. ;-)Frankster said:"
Unless you are the secret monarch of the USA who rules behind the scenes and the rest of your class was part of your high council, then that guy is a twat and had no right to speak to you like that.Sniper Team 4 said:I went to London once (I'm from the U.S.A) and I ran into this. We were all having tea and this random stranger came up to our school group and just chewed us out. Said our country was ruining the world, we're too obsessed with bombing anything or anyone we don't like, and just a whole bunch of that stuff.
America is so bad you feel the need to sympathize with al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, ISIL?Reasonable Atheist said:"Terrorists" exist for a reason, and that reason is there is no other way for them to fight back.
There is a difference between sympathizing with your enemy, and understanding your enemy.MorphBallBomb said:America is so bad you feel the need to sympathize with al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, ISIL?Reasonable Atheist said:"Terrorists" exist for a reason, and that reason is there is no other way for them to fight back.
Consider this:
The reason our military is so big, is because NATO has allowed the EU to outsource its military resources to the United States. We enable your lives to be peaceful, your defense spending to be small, and your domestic spending on healthcare, etc. to be prudent. We have aircraft carriers, so that former naval powers in Western Europe no longer have to. We keep bombers in the air 24/7, so that you don't have to. We build counter-missile installations in your countries, so you don't have to. A clandestine network of spy satellites launched by our covert space program keeps tabs on everybody, everybody including a subset of nations whose actions would threaten your own security, be it economic or territorial, far more than we ever would.
One might beg the question: "without the US and Russian cold war, nuclear annihilation would never have been a threat in the first place!". The genie cannot be put back in the bottle. History cannot be rolled back for a do over. The world we live in has nukes now.
Does China mind our containment of Russia or North Korea? No.
They might mind our increased presence in the Pacific, but to be frank, it's only to sabre rattle at them for attempting to claim chunks of the South China Sea (an extremely large area) that belong to other sovereign nations, like Japan, who also does not mind utilizing our military for their security.
Has the United States made mistakes?
Sure.
Our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq haven't been fruitful. Arming insurgents to fight the Soviets bit us in the ass, but also allowed Afghanistan to live up to its name as "the graveyard of empires". We made a gamble that future terrorism would be less harmful than the continuation of the Soviet state, and we were right. Chechnya also helped, and I don't doubt that we had a hand in that either. Occupying Afghanistan was our mistake, but hunting al-Qaeda there was not.
I have no justification for the war in Iraq, other than destabilizing the region to place power into a reforming Iran's hands while proving that Israel could be tempered. Look up the Samson Option, if you think we're the only crazy ones. Getting Israel to stop feeling threatened enough to potentially kill us all is definitely part of the chess strategy.
If you have any delusions of a kumbayah world, you should lose them now. Everything, including economics, is war by other means. Humanity has never not been in a state of war, and as long as resources are few and ideologies are in conflict, it will continue. Be glad that you are part of the hegemony, and not its enemy.
The real question is, would you rather China, or Russia, or India have geopolitical dominance? Do you miss the British Empire? Or the French? Or the Spanish?
A fair distinction. Apologies for implying you were a 'sympathizer' in that sense.Reasonable Atheist said:There is a difference between sympathizing with your enemy, and understanding your enemy.
More like Americans are violence = as comfortable with it as entertainment as Europeans are with nudity, sex = something intensely private that shouldn't be put on display.Pluvia said:Hmm I think it'd be more accurate to say that the US glorifies violence. It's well known that in the US it's: violence = fantastic, sex = terrible.
Americans are still high on WWII and when they were both top dog taking on the big baddies of the world and well loved, they've just found it very hard since then to be both world hegemon and disliked, something Britain took almost perverse pleasure in.Dwarfman said:From Australia.
It is an unfair stereotype to label all Americans violent but at the same time...
Your media seems to either constantly force feed viewers or glorify in violence.
Many of your movies are based around big Americans doing violent things to non-Americans.
You go to war on multiple fronts.
And we've really got to sit down one day and have a good talk about that unhealthy obsession you have about guns!
Should it? I mean soldiers dying in war is routine and nothing out of the ordinary. And whether or not your culture is pro and anti-war, the mundane and ordinary typically isn't headline worthy (at least on a national scale).Pluvia said:Apparently, despite being pro-war, when soldiers are killed in an American war it isn't headline news over there.
Oh we'll suck off American soldiers all day, as long as they're conforming to the badass warrior stereotype we so badly want them to be. The second veterans and soldiers form a committee about rape (male or otherwise) in the military we ignore them at best, at worst discharge them dishonorably. As soon as veterans want better medical care we create a lip service program that will only cover you if you live within 40 miles of a VA clinic AS THE CROW FUCKING FLIES. It honestly beggars belief the way we shaft our wounded soldiers.Pluvia said:Hmmm Americans tend to demonise sex. It goes beyond "not putting it on display", they tend to react badly to their children even being taught about sex (compared to European countries) for example. They have a very love/hate relationship with it.beastro said:More like Americans are violence = as comfortable with it as entertainment as Europeans are with nudity, sex = something intensely private that shouldn't be put on display.Pluvia said:Hmm I think it'd be more accurate to say that the US glorifies violence. It's well known that in the US it's: violence = fantastic, sex = terrible.
In the latter case, you are talk about the country that produces and consumes the most porn, but like sex in general, Americans just like it out of sight, something the randy Victorians would agree on.
Violence on the other hand, well their 2nd Amendment is about giving everyone the right to carry around weapons designed for killing, and their culture is very pro-war. I did hear about one strange thing recently though.
Apparently, despite being pro-war, when soldiers are killed in an American war it isn't headline news over there.