a ballsy move, which i appreciate, but the law student in me wants to smack notch upside the head for suggesting such a thing ha so yeah im a little torn on this
No, I mean Bethesda. Look up their relationship with Interplay.Lt. Vinciti said:They = Lawyer Yes?Traun said:Considering that they are first class dicks, they'd probably go with it in court.Andy Chalk said:Well, Bethesda? What say you?
Sounds like how it should be...a gentlemans sport to see who wins...
But it's perfect! It won't cost the court anything, it'll raise publicity, it'll ease tensions between studios, and it might become the new norm for game devs!jamiedf said:a ballsy move, which i appreciate, but the law student in me wants to smack notch upside the head for suggesting such a thing ha so yeah im a little torn on this
I really doubt that they would. No-one refers to the elder scrolls games as 'scrolls.' This lawsuit is just kinda exploitative, they don't really think that people are going to mistake one game for the other.Kragg said:option 1. play and lose -> they possibly lose business from the name being used
Its just a shame he doesn't look much like Burt Reynolds.Irridium said:Bethesda just stepped into the... dangerzone.Woodsey said:I suggest Notch go on ("its) a rampage (Lana!") if not.Irridium said:Let the games... BEGIN!
If, of course, Bethesda has the stones for it.
but it also spits in the face of the legal process, if bethesda has raised this lawsuit, it causes problems for the courts who will suddenly get a letter saying "lawsuit dropped, we decided to settle things in the arena" its a legal issue, it should be settled within the legal systemKing Toasty said:But it's perfect! It won't cost the court anything, it'll raise publicity, it'll ease tensions between studios, and it might become the new norm for game devs!jamiedf said:a ballsy move, which i appreciate, but the law student in me wants to smack notch upside the head for suggesting such a thing ha so yeah im a little torn on this
Same thing i thought, it'd be like i made a game called "the elder" about an old man shooing kids off his property and getting sued for it.Jim Grim said:No-one refers to the elder scrolls games as 'scrolls.' This lawsuit is just kinda exploitative, they don't really think that people are going to mistake one game for the other.
What part of that wouldn't be handled by the lawyers? Its not like Todd Howard sits on a +1 Chair of IP Villainy and starts shit with everyone.Traun said:No, I mean Bethesda. Look up their relationship with Interplay.Lt. Vinciti said:They = Lawyer Yes?Traun said:Considering that they are first class dicks, they'd probably go with it in court.Andy Chalk said:Well, Bethesda? What say you?
Sounds like how it should be...a gentlemans sport to see who wins...
Here's the short story of it if you don't know.
1.Interplay is making a Fallout MMO.
2.Interplay is nearing bankruptcy.
3.Interplay sell the Fallout licence to Bethesda, the agreement is "We make Fallout MMO, you make Fallout games."
4.Bethesda makes Fallout 3.
5.Bethesda makes millions.
6.Bethesda goes full Kotick and sues Interplay to take away the rights for the MMO.
7.Court says no.
8.Bethesda know Interplay are standing on their last leg and is suing them again hoping to drain their resources in court battle.
everyone does. this is probably the best way to solve any dispute.Sinspiration said:I want video,
i think notch would say they have to be employees, and nobody would hire a team just to play a game in this economy. bethesda has nothing to lose, really.Kragg said:why would they ever accept this, whatever they do they would loseTraun said:Considering that they are first class dicks, they'd probably go with it in court.Andy Chalk said:Well, Bethesda? What say you?
option 1. play and lose -> they possibly lose business from the name being used
option 2. play and win -> keep name, "omg they bought better players, boycot !!!11" image dent
option 3. dont play -> tiney image dent, high change of getting name changed