Yeah, the sad fact is that much like the media at large, the gaming press is pretty much all on the left. I don't know about you, but can anyone name any gaming site that so much as sits to the right of Engles? Actually, I don't even want a conservative gaming site. I'd just like to be able to go through one day without having some smug liberal shove their holier-than-thou attitude in my face. Especially when it comes to gaming...which is one of the things I turn to to get away from said smugness. That's all I'm asking for. I mean, can't conservatives and liberals at least agree on ONE thing that doesn't become a political football?Mutie said:I understand that a conservative reader is likely to feel a bit battered by the article, but perhaps you shouldn't be acquiring your serious-beeswax news through a DECIDEDLY LEFT WING VIDEO GAMING WEBSITE!!!
Anyone who thinks any media outlet isn't pushing an agenda of some kind is a fool, especially when it comes to political writing. I can understand wanting actual coverage of political discourse to be partisan as hell, especially in a country with a stupid system (2 parties enter, one party leaves: THUNDERDOME! (Yes I'm also applying this to my nations politics as well)). But understandably, when a gaming website... gaming a hobby that has received years of flak from both parties but undeniably more so from the right than the left, gets to cover a story like this, of course there is going to be bias, and more than a little smugness about it.LysanderNemoinis said:Yeah, the sad fact is that much like the media at large, the gaming press is pretty much all on the left. I don't know about you, but can anyone name any gaming site that so much as sits to the right of Engles? Actually, I don't even want a conservative gaming site. I'd just like to be able to go through one day without having some smug liberal shove their holier-than-thou attitude in my face. Especially when it comes to gaming...which is one of the things I turn to to get away from said smugness. That's all I'm asking for. I mean, can't conservatives and liberals at least agree on ONE thing that doesn't become a political football?Mutie said:I understand that a conservative reader is likely to feel a bit battered by the article, but perhaps you shouldn't be acquiring your serious-beeswax news through a DECIDEDLY LEFT WING VIDEO GAMING WEBSITE!!!
What does that have to do with ANYTHING here? Would anything change if he was a practicing Muslim? Do Jews enjoy being harangued over their choice of hobby? Would there be any particular difference if "Mormon," "Red Sox Fan," "Pro Wrestler" or "lesbian?"As a practicing Christian
Unless it's been edited, he did no such thing. He indicated the party to which the guy belongs to is one which engages in shame, ridicule, and invasions of privacy. He did not indicate or imply every member of the party did it nor that they were alone.deathbydeath said:He either implied or believed that every republican/conservative is that kind of fool, which is silly and as stupid as the attitude he lampoons.
I also don't get why people are suddenly up in arms about the "objectivity" of Escapist news stories. In fact, people routinely seem to like the editorialising the News Room does. There's this apparent pattern where people only come out and start chastising them when they editorialise (or merely quip, in some cases) on certain topics.Nowhere Man said:Please stay objective in your articles Escapist.
Assuming that to be true, I don't know why we don't see the conservative gamer do what conservatives have done in every other field: make their own sites dedicated to whatever spin makes them feel comfortable. We now have conservative news, conservative wikipedia, conservative science (because apparently, facts have a known liberal bias) and conservative mathematics. It's become increasingly easy to shelter one's self from the evil liberal menace.LysanderNemoinis said:Yeah, the sad fact is that much like the media at large, the gaming press is pretty much all on the left.
Maybe this is all part of upholding the Masquerade.Murais said:And nobody gave a shit because he's working for the Antediluvians that run the Republican party IRL anyway.
It's because, in those other cases, people actually agree with the quips.Zachary Amaranth said:I also don't get why people are suddenly up in arms about the "objectivity" of Escapist news stories. In fact, people routinely seem to like the editorialising the News Room does. There's this apparent pattern where people only come out and start chastising them when they editorialise (or merely quip, in some cases) on certain topics.Nowhere Man said:Please stay objective in your articles Escapist.
Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't.LysanderNemoinis said:I just wonder if flagrantly insulting (even if in a childish way) another average forum goer is grounds for a warning?
This is a candidate for election in US speaking. Of course it matter. In US mentioning your a christian = automatic charisma stats increase.Zachary Amaranth said:What does that have to do with ANYTHING here? Would anything change if he was a practicing Muslim? Do Jews enjoy being harangued over their choice of hobby? Would there be any particular difference if "Mormon," "Red Sox Fan," "Pro Wrestler" or "lesbian?"
It has.Unless it's been edited
I support Jim Sterlings opinion on this subject. Most of what he does is as centristic as it comes and it takes special kind of extremist to think its left or right wing stuff. And while this article was leaning pretty much left, that sort of was intention seeing as it was political advertisement. Escapist on the whole however isnt leftist, and there are plenty of right wing news outlets. I think the misconception comes out of US. Mainly because you imagine that you have a left party. You have a right wing party and an extremist right wing party. However from your point of view anything less than extremist right is left, which is where the misconception comes from.LysanderNemoinis said:Yeah, the sad fact is that much like the media at large, the gaming press is pretty much all on the left. I don't know about you, but can anyone name any gaming site that so much as sits to the right of Engles? Actually, I don't even want a conservative gaming site. I'd just like to be able to go through one day without having some smug liberal shove their holier-than-thou attitude in my face. Especially when it comes to gaming...which is one of the things I turn to to get away from said smugness. That's all I'm asking for. I mean, can't conservatives and liberals at least agree on ONE thing that doesn't become a political football?
I mean, they do a shit job, then. You seen some of those pallid corpse fucks? If they ain't Nos, they're ugly as sin for any other clan. And I guarantee half their voter-base is ghouled. Either Absimiliard has finally knocked his cobwebs out and gives zero fucks, or we're about to see some full-on Justicar-consented purging soon.Zachary Amaranth said:Maybe this is all part of upholding the Masquerade.Murais said:And nobody gave a shit because he's working for the Antediluvians that run the Republican party IRL anyway.
Considering how much I've seen this site's news stories mock Fox News, this is ludicrous hypocrisy. I actually agree with what you are saying, but when you work on a site that regularly calls out other news outlets for being biased, this sort of post is ridiculous.RossaLincoln said:(if not for the voters of Gainesville, who are essentially arguing about which Republican to send to Washington to ruin the country),
Meanwhile, I am keenly aware of the irony in defending the hobbies and privacy of a man whose chosen political party is devoted to the precise opposite behavior. Fortunately, I'm sure this ridiculous episode will encourage him extend the same courtesy to other peoahahahahahahah. Just kidding. [http://www.jakerushforcongress.com/issues]
You're right he should show more consideration to calling a spade a spade. I'll rephrase, GO ROSSALINCOLN YOU'RE THE BEST! I don't know why a party that is so hypocritical, they, much less anyone else, don't bat an eyelash when caught... daily. Only some democrats with their knowing snickers or exasperated sighs care at this point. Most democrats aren't awesome but at least running a actual government is on their list of priorities.Eric the Orange said:Calm down kid and let me explain.Scorpid said:First, You are silly to post this!Eric the Orange said:I suggest you keep your political opinions out of news posts. they are news posts not editorials.
Second the 'editorial' bit is clearly offended that the hobby he most identifies himself with and its various crossovers of the fanbase is being treated like they're a bunch of, punch drinking, satan worshiping, blood sacrificing cultists with ill intentions. And since you are on this site and bothered to make an account for yourself I would imagine you at least understand where he might be coming from.
Third, this isn't the new york times nor even IGN where the idea of having opinion on gaming is not limited to just 'CoD, best game ever?'.
FOURTH the idea of actual important life changing news as unbias is a myth and can't be done unless you get it from a primary source. Like say watching Cspan where the unblinking and unthinking camera has no opinion and you are not asking it to witness and digest it then compare it to its own knowledge to give you the facts that are the most important in a given event which thus makes that an opinion no matter what.
Fifth! and final. You know that this is an absurd case and thus there really is no relevant 'well what does the otherside think so that viewers can have the most important information made available.' So why bother demanding one here?
I understand the thrust of the article and that supports my point all the more. The reason for the post is that role playing is being less demonized than it was before. There is no reason for him to put his political opinions about how he dislikes republicans. It's not part of the discussion, it's irrelevant to the discussion and thus unnecessary. Look at the comments, more posts are about his political leanings than the actual topic of the post, and thus making the post less effective.
And I know that it is impossible to be completely unbiased, but you can be less biased. There was no reason to say things like "(if not for the voters of Gainesville, who are essentially arguing about which Republican to send to Washington to ruin the country)".
Yeah, that won't work.Sarge034 said:I just browsed through the Escapist COC and this "article" breaks something like half of them so... reported. If a normal poster had put this up I'm sure it would have gone down shortly for being "intentionally inflammatory".
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/codeofconduct
Don't you know only liberals really think. Only liberals are intellectuals. Only Liberals understand the needs of their fellows. Fundamentally, lurking under the skin of every liberal is an aristocrat who believes only the best people should be in charge, i.e them.Kaiser Jon said:"if not for the voters of Gainesville, who are essentially arguing about which Republican to send to Washington to ruin the country"
There goes your objectivity, pal. Don't you think it's hypocritical to bash small-minded people for ridiculing LARPers and then turning around to ridicule all Republicans just for being Republican? Can't you just talk about what's going on in this story, or if you have to take a side make it one of "Open-minded people vs closed-minded witchhunters"?