Nuclear weapons never existed
- Thread starter Piecewise
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Weapons can't be evil...They are inherently nothing, having neither the capacity nor the fingertips to show true evil.Glefistus said:
You can say that people who use them are evil, but that's a discussion from the past that should not be brought up again...
Ask the victims of hiroshima or nagasaki if nuclear bombs are real. Go and see the pictures of the city turned to ashes and dust. I dont see why they are not real. the thory of the bombs is fine, its how nuclear power stations work but more explosive and a lot less controlled.
<=== avatar= reaction
The fact that some guy would deny the fact that all the people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't die in the nuclear blasts is sickening. He lost all credibility when I heard his little intro song to a video about something as serious as nuclear bombs.
The fact that some guy would deny the fact that all the people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't die in the nuclear blasts is sickening. He lost all credibility when I heard his little intro song to a video about something as serious as nuclear bombs.
He belives that Hiroshime was carpet bombed, not hit by a Nuclear Bomb? If that was true, don't you think the Japanese would have said something by now?
And his point at the end, "why don't they call them Nuclear Bombs anymore?" Well, it could possibly be because they aren't Bombs anymore. They're nuclear missiles, they don't need a plane to launch them anymore.
And yeah, that guy is an idiot. Even though that word really doesn't cover his level of stupid.
And his point at the end, "why don't they call them Nuclear Bombs anymore?" Well, it could possibly be because they aren't Bombs anymore. They're nuclear missiles, they don't need a plane to launch them anymore.
And yeah, that guy is an idiot. Even though that word really doesn't cover his level of stupid.
I know what to say. If there are no such things as Nuclear Weapons, than Elephants are bigger than the moon.Piecewise said:
I think the big mushroom cloud and the people who suffered in Japan and i think Oppenheimer and alot of scientists who work in physics would like to have their say. Somehow i trust the scientists and the empirical evidence that nuclear weaponry does exist. But then again somepeople will believe anything including the non-existance cover up thing of nuclear weapons.
Good point about a debate/speech class. I did not think of that. It makes sense really. Only he has his own .org site to match. I wouldn't open a website myself for a debate/speech class. So I do believe he was legit in his belief and ignorance.ntafiend said:
As a side note if the stock footage was produced to worry the Soviets for those that care; when a nuclear bomb detenates it does send a powerfull shockwave. The shockwave travels through the Earth as do earthquakes. Before satelites existed siemigraphs existed. The Soviets already knew we were testing nukes without sats. We knew they were as well. The shockwave passing through the Earth leaves a very different pattern than earthquakes. Everyone knew and knows.
It is in part why those fake Moon footage types are wrong. The Soviet Union confirmed and acknowledged the radio signals comming from the Moon as legit. America's most fearsome enemy acknowledged it by proving it to themselves. Just as America acknowledged Sputnik.
Woman, rain, and clouds...really? How old was she? Despite my attempts at humor regarding the female gender, I am actually a women's liber. I can believe an adult woman would be so, well...dumb? AND, I am the pot.
lol...I honestly don't know what to say...what about the countries that suffered from nuclear weapons...
Yes I do. Because when I hold it after a while I feel lightheaded and start to see funny light paterns in my field of vision. I have not seen Antartica, does that mean it does't exist. I did not see Lincoln sign the Amancipation Proclomation, but black people in my country (USA) vote and we even have a black president. No offense but theoretical debates about what is real in perception does not dismiss evidence. Not that you were suggesting so. You mentioned how do we know. The craters, earthquakes, eye witness accounts, you know evidence.Woem said:This guy is a genius. He's really asking a philosophical question here. How do you know? How do you know anything?
You think that's air you're breathing?
Although Trinity was fine in the first one. Two and three goes to Jada or the woman in red...
Isn't the sun a nuclear weapon itself when mixed with the degrading ozone? Take that, National Geographic!
And if there's anything I've learned from playing video games, (this time picking knowledge from Fallout 3) it's that nuclear bombs DO NOT cause destruction like that, just incinerates people. Only electrical explosion could do that much damage. You know what that means? Someone in Japan encountered Zapdos, and Zapdos wasn't too happy.
And if there's anything I've learned from playing video games, (this time picking knowledge from Fallout 3) it's that nuclear bombs DO NOT cause destruction like that, just incinerates people. Only electrical explosion could do that much damage. You know what that means? Someone in Japan encountered Zapdos, and Zapdos wasn't too happy.
That doesn't mean you know.GrandAm said:Yes I do. Because when I hold it after a while I feel lightheaded and start to see funny light paterns in my field of vision. I have not seen Antartica, does that mean it does't exist. I did not see Lincoln sign the Amancipation Proclomation, but black people in my country (USA) vote and we even have a black president. No offense but theoretical debates about what is real in perception does not dismiss evidence. Not that you were suggesting so. You mentioned how do we know. The craters, earthquakes, eye witness accounts, you know evidence.Woem said:This guy is a genius. He's really asking a philosophical question here. How do you know? How do you know anything?
You think that's air you're breathing?
Although Trinity was fine in the first one. Two and three goes to Jada or the woman in red...
I agree that kind of concept has no place in argument, only in debate or speculation. But it isn't one that can be dismissed (or rather disproved) because you don't live through fact, you live through perception. (your own that is)
orannis62 said:
I think she was 30 at the time. I was mid 20's. I picked her up for a date in a convertable. as were driving around with the top down she said that she hoped it didnt rain. I looked up at the cloudless sky and told her " We should be fine. I dont see any clouds." Beautiful moonlit, starry night. She asked me why the clouds mattered. when i explained that rains comes from clouds, she said " Wow, I didnt know that." I was stunned.GrandAm said:
I didnt know that about the soviets. I did see a mythbusters show where they showed some ways the conspiracy theorists were wrong though.