Scrythe said:
And yes, anal is counterproductive to my point, however, ramming my junk in someone's shitter isn't nearly as destructive as, say, killing the person.
That line made me laugh my ass off. Must be the wording..
LibertyTorch said:
Thanks very much, I appreciate your support.
This is my thoughts too.. I don't harm anybody loving Lady Liberty. Sure some people might be offended by it, but that's because they don't understand it, and can't see it from my point of view, but I am not hurting them.
I want to be able to say that I love Lady Liberty, and not have people asking WHY all the time.
I don't ask other people why they love who they love.
People seem to want a scientific explanation when it comes to asking me how and why I love Lady Liberty
Love cannot always BE explained, and it can just happen, and it did with her. We looked at eachother and smiled and fell in love. I am still completely smitten 3 years on!
The part about this that strikes me as REALLY weird is that you describe an inanimate object as looking at you and smiling. This is quite possibly where the criticism directed at you is coming from. Looking at your post count, that also draws some suspicion on your posts.
I'm not going to say you can't love a statue or a rock, or whatever other non-living thing you want. However, I can't wrap my head around saying it has a spirit or whatever when it is not alive, never was and never will be. Even the materials it's made of were never alive, as opposed to a peice of wood furniture that has material that WAS alive.
I just think it's one of those things you can't understand unless you have the condition/fetish/whatever.