Game Stop employees have no legal obligation to explain the reasoning behind ratings, only to enforce them when underage children try to buy M rated games.-Samurai- said:While that's true, it isn't the child(or teen) in question that would come back screaming at the GameStop employee if he had failed to warn them about the purchase, and they were actually offended or against the content in said game.Nautical Honors Society said:I assume you are being the devil's advocate. He is 16. Have you ever played Halo? Honestly any mature 14 year old could play Halo without any shocking results.Trogdor1138 said:God forbid an employee actually give a shit about what oblivious parents are getting for their kids.
If the parent is buying the game (a individual who is an adult and the child's guardian) should immediately allow the parent to purchase the game. He has no legal obligation to inform and pester the parent on a decision they have already made.
But that being said if a parent is trying to buy a 12 year old GTA then any caring employee should inform the parent...these scenarios are really situational.
He covered his ass while doing the parent a favor. If it takes him being slightly annoying to get parents to pay attention to what their kids are playing, so be it. As long as we don't have another parent screaming that GameStop sold their child a murder/rapist trainer, we're all happy.
Good parents take the responsibility to research the games their children want and not expect to have their information handed to them.