He didn't stop anyone from purchasing anything. He just gave information.mik1 said:That part of the story was to let you know he was serious about people playing the games that are for their age group. And then the kicker was when he made fun of my friend for buying pokemon. Although had people interpreted that way this thread would have died a long time ago.PhiMed said:By the way, take the OP's story with a grain of salt. If he's actually angry enough about someone stating what's in the game and what a typical XBL interaction in Halo is like to post online, he's probably embellishing a bit.
You weren't there when he made the statement about pokemon, and you've already stated your friend likes to make stuff up.
I'm definitely on the employee's side in your story. You got your game. He didn't prevent anyone from purchasing anything, and all he did was talk for (I would guess) less than two minutes in each encounter.
Though honestly, you kind of lost me when you started right off crying about "mature" having an arbitrary cutoff of 17. I don't know what alternative you would prefer. Perhaps an independent counselling session prior to purchase so that the employee can assess the actual maturity of the customer? That way, some 13 year-olds could qualify for purchase, but some 42 year-olds would not, all based on intellectual maturity. Ideal world, right? Waiting time now only 4 short hours!