So I guess there's nothing for it, really. What's the use in getting annoyed or upset by it. I mean, it's not like this petulant bitching is actually having an affect on the indu-MarsAtlas said:OT: Mildly offensive joke that a backer wanted included in the game. I would say that Obsidian probably should've said no to it, but its their game, their choice if they want to edit it or not. I'll be getting the game eventually regardless because Obsidian is one of my favourite developers.
-stry... Ugh!Uratoh said:https://twitter.com/jesawyer/status/582200461127634945
...I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
capcha: roll over. indeed, capcha.
MarsAtlas said:"Cisplaining"
1. I didn't get that implication from the poem. At all. It sucks if you did. It's almost as if these things are subjective.MarsAtlas said:The implication that trans women are gay men trying to trick straight men into having sex with them? Yes, it has. In fact, earlier this year, its what caused a trans woman to be set on fire.
Ya know...it really doesn't matter whether or not you understand it. If someone is just uncomfortable sleeping with a transexual, that's their prerogative.The Almighty Aardvark said:Okay, this is something I don't get. I can understand if you simply don't find a penis attractive when you're attracted to women, or you don't find someone attractive while or after they've transitioned using hormone therapy, but why does it matter to so many people what gender someone was born?
This.J Tyran said:Psychological trauma isn't harmful? For some people its obviously traumatic and a violation thats almost akin to being raped (from their perspective).The Almighty Aardvark said:Once again though, STD's are something that are actually harmful, and I don't think that's a fair comparison.
Ok...so you don't have an answer and only made the last response as a catch-22? People aren't allowed to be uncomfortable with someone that spent a substantial part of their life as one gender wishing to be another and the rest as the gender they want wanting to bone them and having second thoughts about the boning on account of personal reasons? You said to let them down easy, and I asked how with something that was supposed to be taken as a funny and you then go and say that it shouldn't matter? Which is it buddy?The Almighty Aardvark said:snip
This isn't there to set up a dark atmosphere. This is there as a joke. It's there to make people laugh, and it ties into a culture and a set of conceptions that leads to a depressingly high number of violent murders and suicides every year.Shinkicker444 said:This is why we can't have nice things.
The Pillar's world is a dark place, or did you miss all the baby and mother murdering?
I try to avoid these threads because very few people are ever willing to discuss these issues in good faith. Especially when I've got stuff I need to do. Like right now.LostGryphon said:How many people are actually using these forums? It sincerely seems like there's maybe 100 or so, tops, who fill up all these pages with circular 'debate.'
The assumption of trans-misogyny is reached by assuming extra information. The original conclusion was reached by assuming the other individual in the poem is actually transgendered...there is nothing stating that they were.LifeCharacter said:Right, the reasonable thing is to go out of our way with apologetics to find an alternative explanation for the sole sake of proclaiming that the joke is absolutely not offensive. And, if we need to assume extra details about the story like the character being a drunkard, so be it because not doing so would mean that the joke might be offensive and the PC police might have a point and we can't have that.Pr0 said:Only if you assume, by reading the poem, that the individual that Firedorn bedded was a transsexual at all.
When you have one side that takes the joke as is to reach their conclusion, and another that has to (without any actual reasoning beyond the desire for an alternative) assume extra information to reach theirs, why would you ever go with the latter choice? Granted, in this explanation the assumption is that there's no blatant political motivation, which pretty much explains why someone would go with the latter option.
You are away of this thing called Dark Humor, yes?dragonswarrior said:This isn't there to set up a dark atmosphere. This is there as a joke. It's there to make people laugh, and it ties into a culture and a set of conceptions that leads to a depressingly high number of violent murders and suicides every year.Shinkicker444 said:This is why we can't have nice things.
The Pillar's world is a dark place, or did you miss all the baby and mother murdering?
I ain't on your side chief, I'm doing the right thing and supporting Obsidian regardless of what they do. They keep it in? Fine. They remove it? Fine. But I'm getting the impression if they do the prior, some people will call them cowards or say they were bullied into doing it. I'm having none of that. And before you go "but what about if they keep it in and get called bigots by your friends", I won't care. I will not care. They're not going to keep it in out of spite for anybody I'm guessing, so I WON'T CARE. Friends can not support Obsidian or say it's a bad decision or whatever elseZiggyE said:So you're on our side then? Great. Why are you arguing?
I guess a prominent member of a group in favor of EIGJ making a joke that looked like a very specific threat is irrelevant to you in comparison to someone who makes vague "threats".Oh no, one tweet, out of at leat 30,000 active participants, what a nightmare.
Cite each and every one of those examples outside of using reddit, chan, or imgur link before you get back to me. I dare you.Meanwhile the progressives have sent people knives, had people kicked out of their homes, had people fired, actually SENT PEOPLE NEEDLES (you know, instead of just joking about it) all for having the nerve to demand integrity in games journalism.
You brought up the irrelevant stuff first and I'm not the imply all the arguments/viewpoints of my opponent to put me in bad faith, you are.But once again, none of this is relevant at all to obsidian's poem, so why bring it up? Are you not interested in discussing the issue in good faith? Of course, progressives rarely are, that's why terms like "cisplain" exist in the first place. To silence dissent.
Whether it's specifically stated or not, it ties into the culture that trans women are out to "Trick our menz!" into having sex with them. No, it's not specifically stated. But a lot of people are clearly taking it that way, so to try and invalidate their feelings and conceptions of the poem by just being like "GUYS! It's not specific though!" Well... That doesn't really work. And it's also kinda rude.Pr0 said:The assumption of trans-misogyny is reached by assuming extra information. The original conclusion was reached by assuming the other individual in the poem is actually transgendered...there is nothing stating that they were.
You're making the same mistake that they are, its outside of your own personal experience about why they feel that way so you accuse them of "having something to work out" without really trying to both understanding why and respecting it. I always try to be careful when talking about things like this but it isn't a very common thing, for most of history it hasn't even been recognised or acknowledged for the most part.The Almighty Aardvark said:That being said, I stand by my belief that someone who can't accept a transsexual person as anything beyond the physical characteristics they were born with has something to work out. The evidence points strongly towards transsexuals having brains that work like their preferred gender, and if you find someone attractive and can't get past the idea of "Eww, they were a man", then that's an issue. You might not be able to change it, but I don't consider it something you should be comfortable with thinking.
Once again... general you
I'd like to have a day where the normal arguers(myself included of course) in these kinds of things are banned from the topic and all that's left are the rest of the forum community, because it's always the same people with the same talking points, I mean, at the start of this it was interesting, I was seeing names and avatars I hadn't seen before and it was a pretty agreeable thread going on without -plaining and transphobia being thrown around like potatoes.LostGryphon said:And... fuck me, man. It's the SAME people (myself included) in here, on either side, spouting the same shit.
How many people are actually using these forums? It sincerely seems like there's maybe 100 or so, tops, who fill up all these pages with circular 'debate.'
Oh lookie here, you're encouraging drug addiction now, aren't you? How nice...MarsAtlas said:Welcome to the Hotel Califonia.
*eye roll* The "Man sleeps with man by accident and then kills himself in shame" is NOT dark humor. Never has been. It's not about the person killing themselves, it's about the fact that he thought he was sleeping with a woman and it turned out he was wrong and then he's horrified.Shinkicker444 said:You are away of this thing called Dark Humor, yes?dragonswarrior said:This isn't there to set up a dark atmosphere. This is there as a joke. It's there to make people laugh, and it ties into a culture and a set of conceptions that leads to a depressingly high number of violent murders and suicides every year.Shinkicker444 said:This is why we can't have nice things.
The Pillar's world is a dark place, or did you miss all the baby and mother murdering?