Oldest Evidence of Humans in North America Found in Texas
- Thread starter Greg Tito
- Start date
I once talked to someone who actually called that a disadvantage and even an argument against science.Anarchemitis said:
'But then they discovered it was all of Geoff of Rooster Teeth's [http://roosterteeth.com/home.php] trash he never bothered picking up from day one. Scientists were understandably disappointed.
But then they played some Grifball and all were happy.'
Just goes to show, that even with all the crappy weather from hot to cold, Texas appeals to anybody. Even ancient hunters.
But then they played some Grifball and all were happy.'
Just goes to show, that even with all the crappy weather from hot to cold, Texas appeals to anybody. Even ancient hunters.
No, I am NOT on your lawn!Psycho Cat Industries said:
Aren't you going to the old folk's home tomorrow anyway?
Ohhh daring!Quaxar said:
I'm taking this find as evidence that there is a higher being out there with a twisted sense of humour.
I like it when the escapist covers other things besides gaming. Im able to learn something new about SCIENCEEE!!
I hate to be a downer, but pre-Clovis sites have been found before and often end up being incorrectly dated. In Peru, for example, they found a cave they assumed was over 3,000 years older then the Clovis site due to the dating of ash (showing early use of fire) and the depth that certain stone tools were buried. Turns out that tree line dating showed that a massive forest fire had occurred after the Clovis discovery, which had blown ash into the abandoned cave and made it look like the tools were created far earlier then they were. There was also another case where a pre-Clovis site turned out to be just thousands of rocks chipped from falling off a cliff (which no longer existed due to development). For more information, see 'A Short History of Progress' and Jared Diamond's books.
Although it will be very interesting if this is true, it might be a bit too early to proclaim this as legitimate, so I definitely agree with some of the skepticism of the other archaeologists.
Although it will be very interesting if this is true, it might be a bit too early to proclaim this as legitimate, so I definitely agree with some of the skepticism of the other archaeologists.
You mean across the Red River? Cuz that's where a colony of neanderthals settled. East? Uhm, that's where the inbred swamp people live. West? Huh, didn't know that desolate wasteland was ever inhabited. Good to know. South? Dude, that's so racist /mockingsarcasm.ravenshrike said:
Lord Inglip sayeth:
Why you with your fancy shirts and actual clothes!Why I oughta beat you in blockymon!samsonguy920 said:
