The only question here is whether or not gay marriage is in and of itself vulgar, and it's not an asinine question in the slightest.
You, good sir, missed the even more obvious where a woman who is a lesbian can have sex with a man (or use a sperm donor) in order to get pregnant. And a man who is gay can donate sperm in order to help propagate the species. You clearly don't know much about gay parenting. Most kids are not from adopted hetero families who didn't want kids. All of the gay/lesbian couples I know who have children got those children from means other than adoption (and I know lots and lots of gay parents--how many do you know?)DragonLord Seth said:You good sir missed the obvious where a woman cannot impregnate another woman, and a man can't impregnate a man, most kids they have are adopted from hetero families who didn't want kids.
Firstly, thanks for the laugh, lol.GamemasterAnthony said:Seconded... *looks up* Er...make that whatevernumberworks-ed.Grey Day for Elcia said:Bigotry and intolerance are far worse traits to expose a child to than homosexuality ever could be.
Personally, someone should give One Million Moms a nice talking to for what their doing. Like say...maybe have the American Civil Liberties Union explain to them what a First Amendment Rights Violation is...
CAPTCHA: lutand treaty
Mr. President, the Lutand Treaty is ready to sign...
That is hideously offensive. No doubt unintentional, but you may went to change your language there. The way it reads now, you are saying most adopted children are unwanted accidents by their birth parents, and that is simply not the case. At all. The most common reason for giving a child up for adoption is an inability to care for them.DragonLord Seth said:[Most] kids [gay couples] have are adopted from hetero families who didn't want kids.
What do you exspect? contriversal issues always bring out the inner Rush Limbaughs and Keith Obermen in people. its just a good thing the escapist staff is smart enough to post political topics where %99.999 of us will be on one side of an issue.Wookie 1 said:I have to say I find the aggression of people in this thread shocking.
Guess what? Homosexuality is incredibly controversial, guess what else! we are talking about children viewing material that may or may not be undertsandable/ acceptable to them or their parents.
I still say the magazine should have stayed out of political issues like this.
You are simply wrong on this last point:Realitycrash said:To put it very simple: Your opinion is of exactly equal worth as another persons. But since there aren't a lot of you (or enough of you), it matters LESS. That's how our democracy works.
My kids can read what they want, and ask me any question they want.omicron1 said:On topic: Please try to imagine how you would react if the issue was not homosexuality being OK (a liberal talking point); but, say, Christianity? How would you react if it was pushing an agenda you did not agree with to your children? If you had to explain to them that they can't buy any more copies of Archie because Archie and his friends now spout Bible verses every two pages and encourage kids to go to church?
I am only making the assumption that people on the Escapist have a problem with Christians. It's a pretty fair assumption, in all honesty.artanis_neravar said:My kids can read what they want, and ask me any question they want.omicron1 said:On topic: Please try to imagine how you would react if the issue was not homosexuality being OK (a liberal talking point); but, say, Christianity? How would you react if it was pushing an agenda you did not agree with to your children? If you had to explain to them that they can't buy any more copies of Archie because Archie and his friends now spout Bible verses every two pages and encourage kids to go to church?
Beyond that, this openly gay character has been in Archie Comics for almost 2 years now, nothing has dramatically changed in this issue. Now in your example, the entire comic would have changed and would no longer be what it was before. That I would have a problem with, just as I would have a problem with veggietales dropping it's christian undertones.
And you sir have let your own ignorance shine through by assuming that people who support gay marriage have a problem with Christians
Why? The censorship of videogames is often covered, the controversy surrounding movies is covered (the casting of Idris Elba as Heimdall comes to mind) this is no different. It's all connected, this personally reminds me of when Equality Now wanted to ban Japanese Erotic Games or when Faux News accusing Mass Effect 1 of being a sex simulator.Wookie 1 said:I still say the magazine should have stayed out of political issues like this.
Ok if you are only judging the escapist then I withdraw my comment. I would like to point out that if (at least in the US) the debate is split 50/50 and %80 of Americans identify themselves as Christians, then %80 of either side would be christian. (%50 of %80 is %40 and %40 compared to %50 is %80 not saying you can't do the math, just wanted to include it before people try to tell me my math is wrong.)omicron1 said:I am only making the assumption that people on the Escapist have a problem with Christians. It's a pretty fair assumption, in all honesty.artanis_neravar said:My kids can read what they want, and ask me any question they want.omicron1 said:On topic: Please try to imagine how you would react if the issue was not homosexuality being OK (a liberal talking point); but, say, Christianity? How would you react if it was pushing an agenda you did not agree with to your children? If you had to explain to them that they can't buy any more copies of Archie because Archie and his friends now spout Bible verses every two pages and encourage kids to go to church?
Beyond that, this openly gay character has been in Archie Comics for almost 2 years now, nothing has dramatically changed in this issue. Now in your example, the entire comic would have changed and would no longer be what it was before. That I would have a problem with, just as I would have a problem with veggietales dropping it's christian undertones.
And you sir have let your own ignorance shine through by assuming that people who support gay marriage have a problem with Christians
On the second subject, I would consider the presence of any openly political idea in a previously apolitical medium problematic. In this case, the problem point simply moves to 2 years ago, although most people would probably agree that introducing a character that espouses a viewpoint is somewhat different from devoting an entire issue to cheerleading that viewpoint...
On the first subject: Congratulations. You personally are a good bit more tolerant than the vast majority of Americans in both parties. Please do not believe I was specifically addressing you; rather, I was addressing the politically correct zeitgeist, as manifested in the statistical mean Escapist forumgoer.
Oh, the kids would understand just fine if things are properly explained. The parents are much more likely to be incapable of comprehension.Andy Chalk said:This is the last place a parent would expect to be confronted with questions from their children on topics that are too complicated for them to understand.
Seriously? Fuax News? That isn't clever, it's doesn't even make sense.Lovely Mixture said:Faux News accusing Mass Effect 1 of being a sex simulator.
And with this, I would like to add this to the conversationchimpzy said:Oh, the kids would understand just fine if things are properly explained. The parents are much more likely to be incapable of comprehension.Andy Chalk said:This is the last place a parent would expect to be confronted with questions from their children on topics that are too complicated for them to understand.
I, on the other hand, wish for a day when who is having sex / in love with who isn't a political issue...Wookie 1 said:I still say the magazine should have stayed out of political issues like this.
Archie comics has done exactly that. I happen to own a couple issues of Archie from Spire Christian Comics that is all Christian parable all the time. And these comics were not just Christian, but politically Christian. And certainly pushing agenda that I don't agree with. But so what? I read them as a kid I turned out fine.omicron1 said:On topic: Please try to imagine how you would react if the issue was not homosexuality being OK (a liberal talking point); but, say, Christianity? How would you react if it was pushing an agenda you did not agree with to your children? If you had to explain to them that they can't buy any more copies of Archie because Archie and his friends now spout Bible verses every two pages and encourage kids to go to church?