Alabasta pissed me off mostly for one reason. No one fucking died. It was a war, people are going to die. That arc felt so kid-friendly it hurt. And don't even get me started on Pell and the bomb. That scene pissed me off to no end.PapaGreg096 said:Seriously, I thought that the Alabasta arc was one of the strongest arcs but the Skypeia arc can pretty much die in a fire howeverElfgore said:One Piece got really good for me around... episode two hundred. At the start of the Water Seven arc. Till then I'd just thought the series was okay, but I'm glad I pulled through. It got me to the godly arcs that are Enies Lobby and Marineford.
You better brace yourself too, the worst arc is approaching. The Alabasta Arc. *shudders at the memory*
Yeah, if you don't immediately click with Luffy's kind hearted almost-John Cena bad level charm, you didn't have a chance.God said:Well I didn't expect the art to change (anime just don't do that) but I hoped that maybe number three would happen at some point. and I know that some people thought the series didn't get good till like episode 50 or so but damn. Guess I'm one of the few that even after watching the 4kids and the original japanese version I still don't like it. guess I'll go watch Soul Eater for the 6th time.Queen Michael said:Oh, and I nearly forgot: I swear I'm not trying to be rude here, but... What kind of answer did you expect? Unless you thought...
1. ...they'd change almost every single character design after sixty episodes (and into a completely different style), or that
2. ...all us fans hated the first sixty episodes too, or that
3. ...the character writing suddenly would change...
... then I'm not sure what kind of answer you were hoping to get.
Sorry if I came off like that. I just knew that so many here absolutely loved it that I wanted to see what all the love for the show came from. When I mentioned the "out of place comedy" I was referring to some of the parts with Luffy during the Nami and the fishmen arc. You would have a really serious scene where the show was packed with dark and dramatic scenes witch I did enjoy. But then luffy storms in with his I don't care and I don't want to care innocent attitude and takes all the immersion out of the story.144 said:Of my friends who got interested, the ones who did liked a particular arc. That, then got interested in the characters, enough to see how they operated in other arcs.
Not that it matters. You sound like you wanted to prove to someone that you wouldn't like it. Now you want to prove to all of us that it's not good. With it's "out of place comedy and poor design" But obviously a lot of people think One Piece is a fun time.
"I've watched Shonen." I guess you wanted something you were used to? Then watch that. I wouldn't call this that. I would call this comedy with a shonen skin.
Comedian Brian Regan gives a good impersonation of the vibe the OP is giving me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27LzPvvpqHY
Well, the gist of the show is that it's stupid at its core. The main character's power is rubber to keep the fights funny (that's according to the author of the series). There's a scene later where the primary method of propulsion that's used to scale a building is hitting someone in the balls, and the shock generates enough lift to jump many feet in the air. Some people watch scenes like that and respond by saying "hey, that doesn't work! Physics doesn't allow that" or something. Those people miss the point, and are, again, the people impersonated in the aforementioned link. I personally thought the fight between Usopp and Chu the Fishman was funny and clever, and unlike the boring and usual fights anime/manga typically offer. Very few of those, after all, conclude through ignition via red wine. But if you'd prefer to watch what you're used to, there's nothing wrong with that.God said:Sorry if I came off like that. I just knew that so many here absolutely loved it that I wanted to see what all the love for the show came from. When I mentioned the "out of place comedy" I was referring to some of the parts with Luffy during the Nami and the fishmen arc. You would have a really serious scene where the show was packed with dark and dramatic scenes witch I did enjoy. But then luffy storms in with his I don't care and I don't want to care innocent attitude and takes all the immersion out of the story.144 said:Of my friends who got interested, the ones who did liked a particular arc. That, then got interested in the characters, enough to see how they operated in other arcs.
Not that it matters. You sound like you wanted to prove to someone that you wouldn't like it. Now you want to prove to all of us that it's not good. With it's "out of place comedy and poor design" But obviously a lot of people think One Piece is a fun time.
"I've watched Shonen." I guess you wanted something you were used to? Then watch that. I wouldn't call this that. I would call this comedy with a shonen skin.
Comedian Brian Regan gives a good impersonation of the vibe the OP is giving me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27LzPvvpqHY
And "poor design" was more that I just didn't like how most of the villains looked as compared to what they did with the main cast characters. I mean look at sickle sickle fruit guy he has this ridiculous hair swirl. Or how all of the fishmen look but ugly I suppose Arlong looked fine but the fish karate guy with his overly thick neck and the squirt gun guy's over extended mouth. I mean why not make them look more like fish?
With "I've watched shonen" What I meant was that I had seen other shonen meaning the loooooooooong drawn out story lines as well as characters and filler that didn't make too much sense. Overall I want to like this show. I know there is a blast to be had with it but I would like to know where maybe the story takes a more serious turn or maybe where the comedy is a bit more well placed.
I enjoyed that fight too it was definitely clever. Like I said my biggest problem isn't really the comedy I can get behind that. It's just you have parts that the jokes come in at the wrong times and take away from the atmosphere you know? It's not that I'm not used to it. I love animation in all its forms it's almost practically all I watch. I just have a few problems not with how the main cast looks but they make certain enemies look ridiculous so you can't take the threat of said villain seriously. I want the villains to pose some kind of threat while also not having a swirl in their hair that I constantly want to see gone. I mean look at sickle sickle fruit guy can you take him seriously while he has that swirl in his hair?144 said:Well, the gist of the show is that it's stupid at its core. The main character's power is rubber to keep the fights funny (that's according to the author of the series). There's a scene later where the primary method of propulsion that's used to scale a building is hitting someone in the balls, and the shock generates enough lift to jump many feet in the air. Some people watch scenes like that and respond by saying "hey, that doesn't work! Physics doesn't allow that" or something. Those people miss the point, and are, again, the people impersonated in the aforementioned link. I personally thought the fight between Usopp and Chu the Fishman was funny and clever, and unlike the boring and usual fights anime/manga typically offer. Very few of those, after all, conclude through ignition via red wine. But if you'd prefer to watch what you're used to, there's nothing wrong with that.God said:Sorry if I came off like that. I just knew that so many here absolutely loved it that I wanted to see what all the love for the show came from. When I mentioned the "out of place comedy" I was referring to some of the parts with Luffy during the Nami and the fishmen arc. You would have a really serious scene where the show was packed with dark and dramatic scenes witch I did enjoy. But then luffy storms in with his I don't care and I don't want to care innocent attitude and takes all the immersion out of the story.144 said:Of my friends who got interested, the ones who did liked a particular arc. That, then got interested in the characters, enough to see how they operated in other arcs.
Not that it matters. You sound like you wanted to prove to someone that you wouldn't like it. Now you want to prove to all of us that it's not good. With it's "out of place comedy and poor design" But obviously a lot of people think One Piece is a fun time.
"I've watched Shonen." I guess you wanted something you were used to? Then watch that. I wouldn't call this that. I would call this comedy with a shonen skin.
Comedian Brian Regan gives a good impersonation of the vibe the OP is giving me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27LzPvvpqHY
And "poor design" was more that I just didn't like how most of the villains looked as compared to what they did with the main cast characters. I mean look at sickle sickle fruit guy he has this ridiculous hair swirl. Or how all of the fishmen look but ugly I suppose Arlong looked fine but the fish karate guy with his overly thick neck and the squirt gun guy's over extended mouth. I mean why not make them look more like fish?
With "I've watched shonen" What I meant was that I had seen other shonen meaning the loooooooooong drawn out story lines as well as characters and filler that didn't make too much sense. Overall I want to like this show. I know there is a blast to be had with it but I would like to know where maybe the story takes a more serious turn or maybe where the comedy is a bit more well placed.
And regarding their appearances, I find them off-putting at first, yet oddly charming over time, and memorable because of their faults. As opposed to the sea of perfection in so much anime, it's nice that even the main characters remind me a bit of the mutants I pass every day in the subway. Though I'd agree that the animation quality wavers here and there, with some episodes obviously shoddier than others.
I think that's usually kind of the point. You see these goofy ass characters and wonder how you'll ever consider them a threat and then they fuck the Straw Hats up with little to no effort. Then you realize that, yeah, they look stupid but that's just to make you and the Straw Hats underestimate them.God said:I enjoyed that fight too it was definitely clever. Like I said my biggest problem isn't really the comedy I can get behind that. It's just you have parts that the jokes come in at the wrong times and take away from the atmosphere you know? It's not that I'm not used to it. I love animation in all its forms it's almost practically all I watch. I just have a few problems not with how the main cast looks but they make certain enemies look ridiculous so you can't take the threat of said villain seriously. I want the villains to pose some kind of threat while also not having a swirl in their hair that I constantly want to see gone. I mean look at sickle sickle fruit guy can you take him seriously while he has that swirl in his hair?144 said:Well, the gist of the show is that it's stupid at its core. The main character's power is rubber to keep the fights funny (that's according to the author of the series). There's a scene later where the primary method of propulsion that's used to scale a building is hitting someone in the balls, and the shock generates enough lift to jump many feet in the air. Some people watch scenes like that and respond by saying "hey, that doesn't work! Physics doesn't allow that" or something. Those people miss the point, and are, again, the people impersonated in the aforementioned link. I personally thought the fight between Usopp and Chu the Fishman was funny and clever, and unlike the boring and usual fights anime/manga typically offer. Very few of those, after all, conclude through ignition via red wine. But if you'd prefer to watch what you're used to, there's nothing wrong with that.God said:Sorry if I came off like that. I just knew that so many here absolutely loved it that I wanted to see what all the love for the show came from. When I mentioned the "out of place comedy" I was referring to some of the parts with Luffy during the Nami and the fishmen arc. You would have a really serious scene where the show was packed with dark and dramatic scenes witch I did enjoy. But then luffy storms in with his I don't care and I don't want to care innocent attitude and takes all the immersion out of the story.144 said:Of my friends who got interested, the ones who did liked a particular arc. That, then got interested in the characters, enough to see how they operated in other arcs.
Not that it matters. You sound like you wanted to prove to someone that you wouldn't like it. Now you want to prove to all of us that it's not good. With it's "out of place comedy and poor design" But obviously a lot of people think One Piece is a fun time.
"I've watched Shonen." I guess you wanted something you were used to? Then watch that. I wouldn't call this that. I would call this comedy with a shonen skin.
Comedian Brian Regan gives a good impersonation of the vibe the OP is giving me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27LzPvvpqHY
And "poor design" was more that I just didn't like how most of the villains looked as compared to what they did with the main cast characters. I mean look at sickle sickle fruit guy he has this ridiculous hair swirl. Or how all of the fishmen look but ugly I suppose Arlong looked fine but the fish karate guy with his overly thick neck and the squirt gun guy's over extended mouth. I mean why not make them look more like fish?
With "I've watched shonen" What I meant was that I had seen other shonen meaning the loooooooooong drawn out story lines as well as characters and filler that didn't make too much sense. Overall I want to like this show. I know there is a blast to be had with it but I would like to know where maybe the story takes a more serious turn or maybe where the comedy is a bit more well placed.
And regarding their appearances, I find them off-putting at first, yet oddly charming over time, and memorable because of their faults. As opposed to the sea of perfection in so much anime, it's nice that even the main characters remind me a bit of the mutants I pass every day in the subway. Though I'd agree that the animation quality wavers here and there, with some episodes obviously shoddier than others.
![]()
I disagree completely.Queen Michael said:It's good from the start. If you hate it from the beginning it's not suddenly going to get great. Sorry to bear bad news, but you might as well accept that you've wasted about 20 hours of your life and go watch something you like.
This mostly, its been years since I watched the anime and watching it on Toonami I know why, the pacing is awful. If you are lucky two things actually happen in the episode and if you are unlucky the previously ons last for 6 minutes.TheKasp said:Well, do you watch it? There is your issue. The anime is shit: slow pacing, atrocious animation etc.
The manga is quite good for a shonen.
My main problem with Arabasta are those god awful fillers in the beginning. It's literally Luffy and the gang fucking around for 9 episodes in a desert, while occasionally stopping so we can watch Vivi wangst for a half an episode or Ace (who even from an anime-only viewer's perspective was obvious that it was never intended for him to stick with them for that long) comment what a dumb fucking idiot his brother is. The arc is fantastic whenever Crocodile is on screen, but GOD DAMN does it take a while until it gets there. Drum Island and this portion of Arabasta were literally the worst part of One Piece for me.Elfgore said:Alabasta pissed me off mostly for one reason. No one fucking died. It was a war, people are going to die. That arc felt so kid-friendly it hurt. And don't even get me started on Pell and the bomb. That scene pissed me off to no end.PapaGreg096 said:Seriously, I thought that the Alabasta arc was one of the strongest arcs but the Skypeia arc can pretty much die in a fire howeverElfgore said:One Piece got really good for me around... episode two hundred. At the start of the Water Seven arc. Till then I'd just thought the series was okay, but I'm glad I pulled through. It got me to the godly arcs that are Enies Lobby and Marineford.
You better brace yourself too, the worst arc is approaching. The Alabasta Arc. *shudders at the memory*
Skypeia had a great concept, but failed since the action was minimal. Enel was a cool bad guy, but he his and Luffy's fight was lame as hell. Those hundred episode were long and painful.
And to add something, if an episode is an anime filler. Skip it. It's shit. Guaranteed shit.
Well hopefully, good characterization can be what enables you to take a ridiculous-looking character seriously. Later on, you meet Doflamingo and Gecko Moria (look them up), both of whom look stupid and you get over it quickly. Regarding the sickle guy example, perhaps you couldn't get over his weird design as easily because he had poor characterization also. Why? Because he was in a filler episode...God said:I enjoyed that fight too it was definitely clever. Like I said my biggest problem isn't really the comedy I can get behind that. It's just you have parts that the jokes come in at the wrong times and take away from the atmosphere you know? It's not that I'm not used to it. I love animation in all its forms it's almost practically all I watch. I just have a few problems not with how the main cast looks but they make certain enemies look ridiculous so you can't take the threat of said villain seriously. I want the villains to pose some kind of threat while also not having a swirl in their hair that I constantly want to see gone. I mean look at sickle sickle fruit guy can you take him seriously while he has that swirl in his hair?144 said:Well, the gist of the show is that it's stupid at its core. The main character's power is rubber to keep the fights funny (that's according to the author of the series). There's a scene later where the primary method of propulsion that's used to scale a building is hitting someone in the balls, and the shock generates enough lift to jump many feet in the air. Some people watch scenes like that and respond by saying "hey, that doesn't work! Physics doesn't allow that" or something. Those people miss the point, and are, again, the people impersonated in the aforementioned link. I personally thought the fight between Usopp and Chu the Fishman was funny and clever, and unlike the boring and usual fights anime/manga typically offer. Very few of those, after all, conclude through ignition via red wine. But if you'd prefer to watch what you're used to, there's nothing wrong with that.God said:Sorry if I came off like that. I just knew that so many here absolutely loved it that I wanted to see what all the love for the show came from. When I mentioned the "out of place comedy" I was referring to some of the parts with Luffy during the Nami and the fishmen arc. You would have a really serious scene where the show was packed with dark and dramatic scenes witch I did enjoy. But then luffy storms in with his I don't care and I don't want to care innocent attitude and takes all the immersion out of the story.144 said:Of my friends who got interested, the ones who did liked a particular arc. That, then got interested in the characters, enough to see how they operated in other arcs.
Not that it matters. You sound like you wanted to prove to someone that you wouldn't like it. Now you want to prove to all of us that it's not good. With it's "out of place comedy and poor design" But obviously a lot of people think One Piece is a fun time.
"I've watched Shonen." I guess you wanted something you were used to? Then watch that. I wouldn't call this that. I would call this comedy with a shonen skin.
Comedian Brian Regan gives a good impersonation of the vibe the OP is giving me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27LzPvvpqHY
And "poor design" was more that I just didn't like how most of the villains looked as compared to what they did with the main cast characters. I mean look at sickle sickle fruit guy he has this ridiculous hair swirl. Or how all of the fishmen look but ugly I suppose Arlong looked fine but the fish karate guy with his overly thick neck and the squirt gun guy's over extended mouth. I mean why not make them look more like fish?
With "I've watched shonen" What I meant was that I had seen other shonen meaning the loooooooooong drawn out story lines as well as characters and filler that didn't make too much sense. Overall I want to like this show. I know there is a blast to be had with it but I would like to know where maybe the story takes a more serious turn or maybe where the comedy is a bit more well placed.
And regarding their appearances, I find them off-putting at first, yet oddly charming over time, and memorable because of their faults. As opposed to the sea of perfection in so much anime, it's nice that even the main characters remind me a bit of the mutants I pass every day in the subway. Though I'd agree that the animation quality wavers here and there, with some episodes obviously shoddier than others.
![]()
See, that's the thing - I loved Alabasta AND Water 7/Enies Lobby, and rate them both as some of the best arcs in One Piece.Elfgore said:*snip* It got me to the godly arcs that are Enies Lobby and Marineford.
You better brace yourself too, the worst arc is approaching. The Alabasta Arc. *shudders at the memory*
Well, to be fair, almost nobody ever dies in One Piece, except for mooks - and that's fine, since I watch One Piece because it's (generally) fun and light-hearted. If I want something darker I'll read Berserk, where pretty much everyone gets eviscerated.Elfgore said:Alabasta pissed me off mostly for one reason. No one fucking died. It was a war, people are going to die. That arc felt so kid-friendly it hurt. And don't even get me started on Pell and the bomb. That scene pissed me off to no end.
Skypeia had a great concept, but failed since the action was minimal. Enel was a cool bad guy, but he his and Luffy's fight was lame as hell. Those hundred episode were long and painful.
And to add something, if an episode is an anime filler. Skip it. It's shit. Guaranteed shit.