Overpriced DLC

Recommended Videos

brewbeard

New member
Nov 29, 2007
141
0
0
There's a book called Otherland by Tad Williams in which the internet itself is basically built on DLC. It's like the XBL Marketplace meets the elimination of Net Neutrality. Great books, though.
 

IceStar100

New member
Jan 5, 2009
1,172
0
0
I can't say it really ever bugged me. paided for stuff I don't like I admit. Then again I'm the guy you all hate. I enjoy all my add on for fallout. Give me about the same about of fun time as a movie. Than again with horse armour I had spare point and got it.
 

VitalSigns

New member
May 20, 2009
835
0
0
If i'm paying $70 + tax for a game i feel my DLC should be free. That being said I think everyone should have a place to live for free. Money is the king of our society, never expect anything to be free.
 

Skoosh

New member
Jun 19, 2009
178
0
0
I see two sides to this. On one hand, I really hate that there even is down loadable content, as it makes me feel that they rushed the game so I didn't get everything that should have been in it from the start. I don't mind waiting if so long as it means higher quality.

On the other hand, after having millions of people play the game, they have a much better idea of how to make the game better. You already bought this game though, so what incentive do they have to bother making that extra new content? Charge for it!

But being on the consumer end, I ultimately side with free DLC. Ideally though, DLC wouldn't be needed. I don't even play a lot of my games online.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
LimaBravo said:
Yeah its the two minute (What are you using a 486 ?)5 second delay that I object to not the secondary dependant process that integrates into a whole buncha shit that takes up valuable HDD space and generally is UNECCESARY. I try to keep my system clean and empty WTF do I want another process that I have to tell not to update and download whenever it feels like it that facks up MSN, IRC and torrent connections and is generally invasive and totally UNECCESARY for offline play ? Dont even get me started on the bloody adverts that pop up or the fact its UNECCESARY.

Oh yeah and GTAIV requiring Steam, GFWL & Rockstar Social WTF is that about.
Exactly my problem. I got Empire: Total War (PC excusive RTS) and couldn't play it on a friend's PC (so we could play LAN battles after I got my PC working again {windows was dead, which is why I dual-boot with Linux being for online, Windows only for games}) due to some Steam error. Nothing wrong with the game install, just Steam being stupid.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,060
0
0
XDUCK said:
oh yeah i forgot ps3 users usually lose out on dlc so that is even worse than overpriced dlc
How is that worse?
I would've been pissed if I had paid $20 for Lost N Damned.
 

hagaya

New member
Sep 1, 2008
597
0
0
HeyZeus_Ezekiel_Jesus said:
PC users got the maps for free with the V6 patch so why not us? Or get them for a reasonable price?
Because Microsoft demands that people put a price tag for DLC on 360 games. That's the only reason that the Team Fortress 360 DLC will (if it ever sees the light of day) cost money.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
LimaBravo said:
I hope you enjoy Empire demonman_chaos, because me and my buds have had nothing but trouble, MP is passable but no co-op campaign but single player is a buggy POS.
I didn't :(. Too slow paced and the factions are all the same really (save for 1 or 2 specialist units in each, like Minutemen). It was a BIG dissappointment after all the time I spent on Rome (Medieval 2 was also lackluster, partly because I am not a big fan of the time period and partly because the imbalance of gunpowder units). Naval battles were OK, but they got boring fast and I couldn't enjoy any land battles.
Best enjoyed by people that LOVE archer duels in the other games.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
LimaBravo said:
Kinda though so the AI is worse by far the strategy map is lacking strategy and the units arent historical, appropiate or beleivable.


Too make matters worse I really really hoped you could research Fergussons Breechloaders and change history. What actually happens you get a slightly better useless scout unit.
The AI did well, charging in when they were losing hte gunfight and besting my guys in the melee. Though those were small battles, never tried it in bigger battles because I got bored of it too soon.
Too many generic units with exactly the same stats breaks realism quite a bit. I don't remember the US having elite guard infantry or the standard line troops being on par with the British.

I never did the campaign, but I didn't expect much from the tech research. I heard it was almost impossible to get the AI to give up some tech info through diplomacy, which is beleiveable since all Total War games have had stingy AI.
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,475
0
0
ph3onix said:
Time Travelling Toaster said:
ph3onix said:
Time Travelling Toaster said:
Horse Armor for Oblivion >.> I would not fork out money for something that shit o_O
Didn't that come with knights of the nine?
Nope it was stand alone DLC, it cost 200MP(?) and did essentially nothing to the game other than make your horse a bit shiner =/
Oh, I didn't know that.
Oh and bethesda... that's bullshit.
You do realize that stuff was a joke right? Its like 2.50 USD. I don't think thats over priced, plus, you don't need it
 

gunbladejoe

New member
Jun 4, 2008
434
0
0
yeah that sounds like a pretty messed up system thing. I think that they should just go ahead and make it free. that or make it like $0.50 ea map.
 

onfirejb

New member
Jun 8, 2009
30
0
0
not a zaar said:
silverbullet1989 said:
APPCRASH said:
Ah, the joys of free updates for the PC.
It isnt going stay like that forever saddly... once games for windows starts taking over everything micro$oft will have control over dlc on the pc too

personnaly i dont think it will be long before were been charged to get a patch for the games... dlc i think is the worse thing to happen to games due to the fact its encouraging companies to make a full game, then just before release saying " hmmm what can we cut out and sell back to the public at a later date?" games are becoming arguably shorter, and more pricy...
Thankfully Games for Windows has almost no chance up against Steam, and we've all seen how supportive Valve has been with TF2. I think Xbox 360 users made a lot of big mistakes, they never raised any stink over subscription fees for XBL or DLC, so they get what they deserve: more and more micropayments and other assorted BS.
I think you have no idea what happens in the Xbox360 community. LIVE users (myself included) constantly complain about the price of LIVE and DLC, we have been for a long time now. For example: When thousands and thousands of people put "MAKE XBOX LIVE FREE" in their mottos a while back. Its just that Microsoft has ignored us to death and now most people have given up on complaining. Also, it doesn't help that idiots used to go onto the xbox website and complain about every tiny thing i.e; "OMG LIVE IS WAY 2 EXPENSIVES IM BUYIN A PS3 I TORRENT GAMEZ!!! LOLOLOLOL!!!!!", without giving an actual valid reason or a proper argument.
 

blaze96

New member
Apr 9, 2008
4,515
0
0
Yeah DLC is just getting to not be worth it. Fallout 3's DLC is way overpriced for the length of game added on to it. Though I think the worst offender is Sims 3, they make these stupid (tiki or ancient era)item packs that barely do anything to the game then charge you money and have the gall to call it premium.
 
Jul 8, 2008
333
0
0
I actually had some fuck try to tell me the COD4 maps are on the disc. Bullshit, I've had the game for six months. I'd have played them buy now if they were.
 

TheMushroomClub

New member
Aug 12, 2008
219
0
0
Premium themes are a rip off too. I wanted the Banjo Kazooie theme, but 800 MS points? You must be having a giraffe.
 

Credge

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,042
0
0
silverbullet1989 said:
It isnt going stay like that forever saddly... once games for windows starts taking over everything micro$oft will have control over dlc on the pc too
Except it doesn't work that way at all.

Microsoft doesn't own the PC platform.

Edit: Anyway, all DLC is overpriced. Every ounce of it.
 

saphirekosmos

New member
Dec 25, 2008
116
0
0
Ya, The DLC stuff is wrong in some cases in my opinion. Stuff like the horse pack and whatnot. But things like Most of the Fallout Expansions and things that add hours of new gamplay, that is worth ten bucks. I have both a 360 and a computer. I used to be a console exclusive gamer, but now I am a PC gamer for the simple fact that the PC has mods. And in my opinion small DLC and whatnot for the PC should be free, or at least cheap. Partly for the fact that in order to keep up to date with your hardware with the newer games you have to fork out hundreds of dollars every year, if not more often. That is my only problem with the PC as a gaming platform, but the free stuff and mods make up for that. I also don't mind DLC so much if I can get it on a disk. I just don't like the idea of the only copy of it being in digital form, I like to have a hard copy just in case. And as for steam, I have heard alot of people complain, I haven't heard much about it though. From the sounds of it you have to log in online to play even a single player game? If so that is cr@p. Not everyone can have access to the internet every time they wanna play a game.
 

Wadders

New member
Aug 16, 2008
3,793
0
0
Well game developers have to pay the bills too, you can't really expect them to make shit for free...

However, I say this as PC gamer, if I had an X box I'm sure i would have a different perspective :p