I wouldn't go that far. I know a lot more stupid people who are ready to jump to conclusions than intelligent people, because stupid people don't tend to think about what they are about to say. In the defense of my pops, he saw me melting my enemies into puddles of goo right after he saw a news report saying the Columbine kids made a shooter mod of Doom that mirrored the layout of their school.Dastardly said:Oddly enough, it makes a lot of sense (in their minds). The smarter, more educated, and more independent a person is (or believes themselves to be), the more inclined they are to believe there is a clear reason for everything.
When there is something as unfathomable as a school shooting, the reason isn't as clear. And we often don't want to hear about "reasons," because we think that means we're letting them excuse the shooting. So, the educated, rational person who believes they are nigh-impossible to fool or surprise? He decides that the nearest potential factor that he's not intimately familiar with is the cause.
Yep. Smarter and more educated people are very often more likely to react that way, and to do so more strongly.
When I try to explain video games and their benefits to dumb people, I either get a blank stare or they tell me they like FIFA. When I do so with a college professor, their response is more nuanced. Hell, the professors who still don't like games after I make my points leave me satisfied because they are able to respond in a way that makes me think they aren't making a judgement out of ignorance.
From what I gather, adults tend to have preconceived notions about games and they are just waiting for some piece of info that confirms their beliefs to move on with their lives. This can be said about many other groups, but that's another discussion.lokiduck said:My parents are both okay with them though my mom didn't want me seeing violence till I was older. She even played computer games when i was really little.
Facts are with the media it's really hard to prove the argument. Every psycho with a gun is of course going to cause problems.
It's kind of like how no matter how you try to prove that if people and kids just learned proper gun safety and how to handle one properly there would be less accidences. Because if you try they just point at the statistics of those that have been hurt.
It also doesn't help that in my General Psychology class we heard a video about how kids with suggestiable and certain mental conditions will become more violent from games...
All the parents in the class were like "because of this we should remove all violent videogames from any child just in case."
My response was: A game doesn't make you violent, just because you are shooting up fictional people doesn't mean you learn instantly how to shoot a gun."
Personally it is a parent's right what their kids see and play, so banning all games is rreally just a stupid idea... convincing your parents though is hard.
What I am starting to learn from this violent video game debate is something that the gun lobby has been screaming for years. "Guns don't kill people, people kill people." Just switch out guns with games and you get the idea.
It's not that I wasn't aware of this notion, it just didn't cross my mind to actually think that a person who becomes deranged enough to commit an Oslo massacre or a Virginia Tech shooting is already a sick minded individual, and their life leading up to their killings is just an amalgamation of all the things they do in a day. In this case games could be considered a trigger, but in reality a person with that kind of mental fragility could be spurned by a long left turn on an intersection.
Believe you me, I have brought this up before. The response is almost always "Yea, but movies are different." WHY? "They just are." Little to no thought ever goes into this exchange. What I usually gather is the person has made up their mind, and doesn't feel like talking about it. It's probably the least confrontational approach, but I hate it. It's really just wasted brainpower by that point and nothing is gained from talking with them, either from seeing their point or articulating mine.Cain_Zeros said:When they say this you should point out that the same thing happens when they watch TV, and at least you're interacting with your entertainment and engaging your brain a bit more. They'll either see your point or get really pissed off (which might mean they saw your point and didn't want to admit it).
As for me, when I was younger my mom would sometimes wish I didn't play so much, and she tended to enforce ratings, but other than that she's let me do my own thing.
It tends to bother me too. I don't understand grown people who aren't able to separated simulated violence with actual harm. It screams of insecurity to me. I have an aunt like that as well, but she can't deal with violence on any level, so at least her consistency doesn't bother me.Raggedstar said:Though once my aunt saw me playing Assassin's Creed and she went all horrified going "Oh my. You're KILLING people in that game?". Even if I go saying that the world is immersive and the history (even if it's hit and miss) was interesting and the people I was killing were bad people and Templars out to conquer the world. She basically said "uh huh, but you're killing people". It never got much more serious than that, but I'm rather irked by how hardly anyone under the age of 35 in my family sees video games on a level above "noise machines"...
Yea, my dad loves the Bravehearts of the world. He doesn't care about violence this way or that in movies because he sees it as a passive experience. Video games force you to kill, all while doing nothing at all (a paradox I am smart enough never to point out.)mikespoff said:Just curious - does your dad watch movies? 'Cos that must be even more stupid: for the whole of Schindler's List or Shawshank Redemption, you just sit there and stare at the screen.
Books are stupid, too: you just sit there and stare at the pages.
To get to the heart of your question, it's hard to communicate the interactive nature of games to someone who hasn't played them, or at least watched someone else play them. It's like trying to describe the immersive potential of literature to someone who can't read.
My parents don't really understand games, but they have come to terms with my gaming. Of course, it helps that I'm in my 30s and have been buying my own hardware and software for 15 years now...![]()