well i'll agree with you on one thing, he should move out. see how he feels about that £100 after spending some time in the real world.Abandon4093 said:Bullshit, you're a child until you enter the real world. i.e. the job market.Mr Ink 5000 said:i never said they should relinquish all responsibility at 18. but their priorities should shift as his age changes, and teach him a little bit about surviving in the real world, give him a little responsibility. parents obligation to raise their child goes beyond throwing money at them.Abandon4093 said:As someone else in this thread said.Mr Ink 5000 said:18 onwards he's no longer a child, there are children in the house who deserve supporting more as they are children, and benifits are being reduced due to his being over 18.Abandon4093 said:If she wasn't prepared to do that then she shouldn't have had a child.archabaddon said:She did raise you for 18 years, diapered your ass when you were crapping yourself as a baby, fed you when you couldn't feed yourself, etc. I think £100 is a trivial fee to pay rent.
He didn't decide one day that he should just be born and inconvenience her with nappies and crying.
Your logic is flawed, that is what is expected of every parent. Paying upkeep whilst you're studying shouldn't be expected of any child.
Also, parents have a reasponsibility to prepare you for the real world. it'd cost him alot more to move out
A parents responsibility doesn't just disappear once the child turns 18. You only stop being a parent when you're mentally or physically incapable of being one.
If he can't afford £100 a month then what is he to do? He's left with the option of dropping out of uni to pick up a paying job. Not exactly the most parental ultimatum to give a child is it?
why isn't it a parental thing to do? there are other children, actual minors in the house, should they suffer so he can go into further education without any promise of a job after? shouldnt (i'm guessing an age here) a 12 year old being clothed and fed take priority over an 18 year olds dreams of further education?
he's 18 and got to take some responsibilities in life. it's not like they're asking him to pay exactly his share of all costs, just a reasonable contribution.
EDIT: No its not a childs reasponsibilty to suport the family, but he aint a child no more n £100 a month aint suppoting, its a contribution
The parents should be looking at getting a job themselves instead of syphoning their childs loan. I have no sympathy for someone with that many children who lives on benefits. You shouldn't be allowed children if you can't fiscally care for them.
He's 18 and studying. He shouldn't be worrying about paying his parents rent.
Like I said OP. Move out and get a accommodation loan. Move in a flat with a group of students and have a blast.
"dreams of further education" ?..... Everyone has the right to further education. End of!
Also, as for your 'Edit:'. Talk about basic reading comprehension failure.
I bolded the bit you clearly missed. Because you felt the need to repeat it's meaning to me using different words, as if you were telling me something new.me said:It is not the childs responsibility to help support the family. Especially not when they're in education.
:/
n feel free to call BS n say he's still a child, i think its pathetic to be 18+ and want to be considered a child.
and yes "dreams of further education" Everyone has the right to further education if you say so, but my parents couldnt afford to foot the bill (ie pay give me a free pass on everything) and sometimes in life thats just the cards your dealt. should my parents not have had me because they couldnt afford to carry once i turned 18 and they no longer recieved child benifit?