I've never had any experience with AMD processors, so I can't comment on that. I will say that if you're gaming, go for an Intel processor. This is because Intel processors are better suited for single threaded tasks, like gaming, whereas AMD is better for multi-threaded tasks, like video editing. But so far, it seems to be a good budget build.DarklordKyo said:
It was a friend of mine who put this together, secondly, he claims the integrated graphics in the CPU should be good enough (says it's the one that's gonna be used in the PS4).thesilentman said:I've never had any experience with AMD processors, so I can't comment on that. I will say that if you're gaming, go for an Intel processor. This is because Intel processors are better suited for single threaded tasks, like gaming, whereas AMD is better for multi-threaded tasks, like video editing. But so far, it seems to be a good budget build.DarklordKyo said:
And what graphics card are you planning to use? You seem to have left that out, so I just wanted to ask if you've decided on one.
No,no,no,no,no,no! Never use integrated graphics. Always buy a discrete graphics card.DarklordKyo said:It was a friend of mine who put this together, secondly, he claims the integrated graphics in the CPU should be good enough (says it's the one that's gonna be used in the PS4).thesilentman said:I've never had any experience with AMD processors, so I can't comment on that. I will say that if you're gaming, go for an Intel processor. This is because Intel processors are better suited for single threaded tasks, like gaming, whereas AMD is better for multi-threaded tasks, like video editing. But so far, it seems to be a good budget build.DarklordKyo said:
And what graphics card are you planning to use? You seem to have left that out, so I just wanted to ask if you've decided on one.
Hence why I haven't bought it despite it falling within my current savings.ShinyCharizard said:No,no,no,no,no,no! Never use integrated graphics. Always buy a discrete graphics card.DarklordKyo said:It was a friend of mine who put this together, secondly, he claims the integrated graphics in the CPU should be good enough (says it's the one that's gonna be used in the PS4).thesilentman said:I've never had any experience with AMD processors, so I can't comment on that. I will say that if you're gaming, go for an Intel processor. This is because Intel processors are better suited for single threaded tasks, like gaming, whereas AMD is better for multi-threaded tasks, like video editing. But so far, it seems to be a good budget build.DarklordKyo said:
And what graphics card are you planning to use? You seem to have left that out, so I just wanted to ask if you've decided on one.
You should as a minimum buy a HD 7850 or a GTX 650. They will allow you to run every game at mid/high settingsDarklordKyo said:Hence why I haven't bought it despite it falling within my current savings.ShinyCharizard said:No,no,no,no,no,no! Never use integrated graphics. Always buy a discrete graphics card.DarklordKyo said:It was a friend of mine who put this together, secondly, he claims the integrated graphics in the CPU should be good enough (says it's the one that's gonna be used in the PS4).thesilentman said:I've never had any experience with AMD processors, so I can't comment on that. I will say that if you're gaming, go for an Intel processor. This is because Intel processors are better suited for single threaded tasks, like gaming, whereas AMD is better for multi-threaded tasks, like video editing. But so far, it seems to be a good budget build.DarklordKyo said:
And what graphics card are you planning to use? You seem to have left that out, so I just wanted to ask if you've decided on one.
Sure but a crossfire system with two crap graphics cards isn't really the smartest decision. Having just one good card would be betterAWAR said:
In that caseDarklordKyo said:
