Interesting article. I may read The Time Machine again to grasp what's in store for my descendants, lol! I think the author is probably overreaching a tad, but it does cause me to wonder the extent to which phenotype changes in complex organisms resulting from natural selection can be predicted before they occur. Usually, it seems they are rationalized after the fact.sartezalb said:Well hell, perhaps the internet's not so pointless. Thanks!
As far as "human evolution" goes, here's a funny article, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm] but I wouldn't treat it as gospel. Just kinda something to "think" about.
As far as the abuse of technologies, it might be interesting to think on Richard Feynman's statements regarding his work on the atom bomb; paraphrased, his work on splitting the atom was scientific work, but his work on making a feasible bomb was engineering work. Does the distinction matter? I think that's ultimately a matter of personal opinion.
That is a very good point raised by Feynman's work. I say the distinction does not matter- science is a tool, and in practice there is no reason to disassociate it from its specific applications- such as in engineering. But the question is philosophical in nature- as you say, a matter of opinion. I'm just stating mine. Also, vanilla is the best flavor of ice cream.
New information, thanks again!