People need to be in a relationship to be "complete"...?

KingGolem

New member
Jun 16, 2009
388
0
0
Doclector said:
"Why? Why do I want a girlfriend when the torment, and investment of time, effort, emotions, mind-power, and let's be honest here, money, makes such a goal not worth it, to downright impossible?"
What do you know? That's exactly what I thought! Good to see somebody else gets it. The idea that you can't be "complete" without a relationship is nonsensical garbage dreamed up by poets and hippies. I'm a living counterexample to their thesis.
 

Ubermetalhed

New member
Sep 15, 2009
905
0
0
Recently broke up with my gf. Currently I am content with being single, it's nice I can do what I want and achieve my goals without any added pressures.

Eventually I'll want a relationship again but it's not the be all and end all by any means.
 

Drummie666

New member
Jan 1, 2011
739
0
0
I'm 16 and I've never been in a romantic relationship. It's not that I've failed miserably in it, I've just never pursued it, as I've never felt the need to. No, I'm not asexual, I am physically attracted to women, but I've never felt a need to enter a romantic relationship.

Forever alone and fine with it.
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,912
0
0
Guardian of Nekops said:
I think a large part of it stems from the human incapacity to just be happy. Once you convince yourself that life sucks (and there's never a shortage of evidence for that, if you go looking) you start looking for something to fix everything.

Well, if you're single, that's a pretty obvious scapegoat. So you find someone to be with, expecting them to make everything better. Then, when they don't, everything falls apart.

It's sort of like how people figure that everything would be better if they could use magic, or if they had more money, or if they didn't have to work at the horrible place they do now... it probably wouldn't be, or at least not as much as you think, but it's easier to trace all your problems to one source so you can hope things will get better.

So yes, relationships are, or at least can be, good. Great, even. But they're not the solution, and if you go into them looking for the "make everything better" button they can wind up being the next problem.
I think this is a good post. It probably is in our nature to overreach, or to not be content with what we have. Which is something that I would think is exacerbated by our media. If you've grown up with pop music, Hollywood films and sitcoms like Friends(in which attaining the desired relationship fixes everything for the protagonist)...it's not entirely surprising that romance and relationships are high priority.

Personally, I haven't dated for a few years now and I'm perfectly happy with that. To further demonstrate where I'm at mentally. When I do think about possibly looking for a new relationship, I don't think about the intimacy, companionship or sex...my first thought is that it's potentially someone who could pay half of the rent.

I'm such a romantic.
 

BOOM headshot65

New member
Jul 7, 2011
939
0
0
I know for a FACT that I feel way better that I have a girlfriend, even more so since we want to get married to eachother when we are old enough (not long now ;)

But really, as a couple, we defy all current norms of relationships, instead opting for something more like the '50, A time period we both love.

We rarely "go out" and when we do, we go to something cheap. Does she care. No. As long as she is with me, she doesnt care how much I spend for her, same for me too. We rarely kiss, instead we hold hands or just cuddle. We try to keep eachother family happy with us so that they dont try to break us up. The list goes on and on...
 

lord.jeff

New member
Oct 27, 2010
1,468
0
0
I used to have the same thoughts but then I met someone and my thoughts changed, not saying you need someone but meeting someone good for you will improve your life, and that person usually comes with a minimum amount of torment.
 

Digitaldreamer7

New member
Sep 30, 2008
590
0
0
I also preferred to be alone, until I found the perfect woman. Now, I can still be alone when I want and there's no drama or BS attached to it. I could come home and game all night and I don't hear a peep out of her. Mainly because she'd come home and game all night with me or not directly with me but in the same room and be happy. BTW it gets better when you get older. I'm 30 today and she's 29. We have grown past the whole BS of dating etc and decided we just want to be together.

Pprotip, be who you are now all the time, including while you are in the relationship. What kept me single for so long is the fact that most women expected some sort of change in my behavior after we decided to be in a relationship, which, didn't happen. I'm still the same person in a relationship as I am single. The only difference is that i'm only with her lol.
 

generals3

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,198
0
0
Doclector said:
This assumption in society seems to harm so many people. When I think of what it did to me once upon a time, thinking I was worthless and doomed to a joyless life, and what it appears to be doing to my aforementioned friend, well, I wish there was something I could do to shatter this misconception that you NEED a second half to be happy.

TL:DR; What do you think of this assumption?
The biggest question you have to ask yourself is what are your goals in life? Now i still have plenty of time left so i'm not too worried yet. But one of the things i want is too pass on "myself" so to speak, so having children. And personally i want that child to be not just half of me but also half of someone i respect and think is worth it. So by default in order to accomplish one of my goals i would need a stable relationship. This said i'm not looking for relationships for the sake of it. I see way too many people just looking for partners because apparently that's what needs to be done, without really thinking about it. I always say "if you can't see yourself married and raising a family with that person you're doing it wrong".

Now if you don't feel that need to raise a family why bother, if it's for the sexual intercourse there are plenty of women out there who's job it is to satisfy your needs.
 

Powereaver

New member
Apr 25, 2010
813
0
0
I think theres always been something a little "overkill" to the term you complete me... but i guess once youre in a relationship it just feels like perfection a lot of the time so i can sorta understand.
 

JemothSkarii

Thanks!
Nov 9, 2010
1,169
0
0
It's really subjective, some people like their independence and such and therefore can be single quite happily. Other people (like myself) who have entered a relationship and have lost such a things have a very large, painful gap...though personally I try to get myself to move on before I go soul searching, the next person doesn't need that baggage...
*sees a picture of his ex and curls up in the fetal position*
 

Doomknight1of24

New member
Nov 25, 2011
1
0
0
Straight up? A relationship is often not (or at least not only) about intimacy, but about self-identification.
If I may quote, we identify ourselves usually through three things: peers, progress, and passion. If you are popular, or at least have a crowd of friends, are generally successful at work/school/whatever it is you do, and, lastly have a partner as befitting to your status, you can well and safe consider yourself the Big Man.
What I mean with this is not that everyone with a girlfriend/boyfriend is a shallow d***hole only intent on keeping up an appearance, but that some people simply consider being together with someone to be a necessary part of life. So yes, you could say that there are people who need to be in a relationship to be complete. That doesn't mean that that has to apply to yourself. I admit that having a significant other is probably a nice thing to have (not that I would know XD ), but since the definition of "being complete" is not really an absolute term in the first place, it doesn't really matter in this argument. And obsessing over maintaining the "Big Man"-status is probably not exactly a healthy thing to do, so the best thing would probably be to simply stop doing it (obsessing, I mean).

PS: I, too, have a chronically lovesick friend. Except that he almost never manages to man up and Get The Girl. My theory is that those people are simply in love with love, and if that's what they think they need, then I see no reason why anyone else should care. It can make for some funny anecdotes, though.
 

ReinWeisserRitter

New member
Nov 15, 2011
749
0
0
Were you the guys that ordered a wall of text? It's hot!

There are benefits to both, at least where I'm concerned. I'm an independent person; I like doing things my way, I do not like the conceptions tying yourself to a person can do to a relationship with them, and I generally avoid serious relationships altogether because I invest myself extremely heavily into people I'm close to while exposing my fleshy, delicate back to the objects of my affection, and most people seem to have "STAB STAB STAB STAB" as their first impulse when faced with such a situation, in my experience. I was more or less dragged into my current serious relationship despite piling reasons as to why it may not work out. My other would not have it and cheerfully declared me theirs anyway. Bear all of this in mind for the paragraph after next. I kind of shrugged and went along with it at the time.

The above said, a serious relationship can be extremely rewarding. Depending on how seriously you take such things and how good your chemistry with them is, they become what feels like your other half, what makes you complete. This person does that to me; I'm still filled with giddiness and excitement when they're around, nearly a full year since we became "official". They've told me they feel much the same way I do; that I feel right, that I feel like "home", that without me things wouldn't be as good as they could be. They want to be with me as long as I'll let them, they want to wake up next to me, come home to me, grow old with me, have kids with me, something that normally seems repulsive to me, but with them, seems like something I could actually enjoy, partly because it'd be something I'd share only with them.

On the other hand, they also cheated on me recently. At literally the first opportunity presented to them to date, as it turns out, because they're an impulsive idiot under the right (wrong?) circumstances. They then hid it from me until confronted with the evidence I found of it.

For a number of reasons that I'm not going into here, I've decided to try to forgive them; I feel that what we would lose should I break things off with them would be greater than what I gain in an attempt at justice or vindication. But it also illustrates one of the most horrible risks of such a bond, the threat that no matter what they say, no matter how much they love you, no matter how much like "home" you feel to them, there may come a time when you mean absolutely nothing to them, and the threat that such a thing could taint your relationship for the rest of your life, if it lasts that long. It's been the most emotionally trying and painful thing I've faced to date, nearly two months later, because it was also the first time a relationship had been wonderful. It wasn't perfect, no, but it didn't have to be. I'd never felt so sure of anything in my life, and yet there's a new pointy object in my back despite my decreasing need for having one on hand, and it was put there by someone that managed to make me love them more than anything in my life up to now, partly through their sheer force of will.

But despite my newfound lack of trust for this person, I mostly believe them when they say they're sorry, that they didn't understand at the time what they were doing, and that they didn't fully appreciate what we had together until they were at risk of losing it. So I have to open myself up to this person again, more or less hand them another knife and trust them not to use it this time, because I don't want to lie awake one day and wonder what could have been if I didn't. They aren't getting a third chance, so they'd best make the most of this one if they're not just stringing me along for as much as it gets them, but if they aren't, then we still have so much to enjoy, and gain, in this thing they've dragged me into that I've ended up being incredibly happy they did.

Do I have any regrets about the decision, made despite my independent nature, my discontent with serious relationships, my past of being betrayed (even by them), and having to condition myself to ignore my recently acquired desire to look over my shoulder just in case? No, actually. I didn't need this person to feel complete, but now that they're here, they've created pieces of the puzzle that result in a picture that involves them beside me. That's what love ultimately does: creates a bigger picture. You don't need it to be complete before, but once someone special shows up, once you've let them in, and they you, they complete you from then on, possibly for the rest of your life, even if they are one day gone from it, but until then, you're no worse off. The question for me in regards to this person then becomes whether I want to acknowledge that the new pieces are there, and despite the risks, the answer is yes. The picture just wouldn't look right anymore otherwise.
 

FrequentFlyer

New member
Sep 11, 2011
15
0
0
Umm...I don't think that's true.

To feel truly complete, you don't need a partner or some sort of relationship to depend upon. To feel truly complete, humans only need to feel that they've achieved something in their life, and sustaining a relationship is one of those great ways to assess how well you've spent the time given to you.

A sense of accomplishment is what really makes people feel complete, not the need of another individual.
 

chowderface

New member
Nov 18, 2009
327
0
0
This is probably going to get me a warning for excessive tangential snark, but I love how every time one of these topics pops up it always comes out that the person making it has no objective basis for the question, they're just bitter over either just coming out of a bad relationship, or being too misanthropic to ever HAVE a good relationship without years of therapy. Way to break away from media stereotypes guys.

On topic, I don't think it's NECESSARY, per se, but it's nice to be in one if it's not a real toxic one (says the single guy).
 

manheim

New member
Mar 17, 2010
10
0
0
I think it depends, some people like relationships, some people don't; and that can change, i used to be a loner, and honestly thought that i'd never be in a relationship; about 2 years ago, i met a girl; and now we're getting married. What makes you happy is not an absolute, and the way i see it, you have to be a "complete person" (whatever that is) to be in a healthy relationship; otherwise you're looking for someone to help you mature; and that is not the point of an adult relation.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
I think there is an idea that "if youre single then you obviously NEED a relationship"

right now personally Im more than fine beign single, Id rather devote my time to myself right now and not have to worry about somone else

also Im not going to freak out about it....if it happens it does, if it doesnt it doesnt (though to be fair with my current lifestyle theres not much chance of that happening anyway)