Peruvian Scientists Discover Alien Corpse
- Thread starter Earnest Cavalli
- Start date
Recommended Videos
what they cant run some DNA test or something? Its not like the bones are fossilized. There should be some traces of it left over some where.
Yeah sure, because it has so many humanoid features like a NOSE. True the eyes are freaking huge but we can't REALLY have called it. Yep, it looks totally like all aliens imagined, huge bulbous head, huge eyes. Uh huh, I refuse to believe we predicted what they looked like to this extent.
Totally legit. No need for DNA tests! It looks, therefore it is. The simplest answer is the right one. Totally.
Yeah, I'm going to need a lot more proof, or else I am going to stick to the "I don't buy it" stance I have right now.
Yeah, I'm going to need a lot more proof, or else I am going to stick to the "I don't buy it" stance I have right now.
This. Here we have a strange shaped skull being found in an area where the ancient human inhabitants were known for binding their skulls into strange shapes. Now, I'm no doctor, but I am at least partially sane, and I think that qualifies me to say "No, it's not an alien skull... you silly sausage"spasicle said:
Although if it was an alien skull then that would beg a million more questions about the chances of an alien lifeform developing lightyears away from our planet, under completely different chemical, biological, atmospherical etc. conditions, and the bigget difference in their bone structure is having larger foreheads than us. I mean, if there is intelligent life in the universe capable of reaching earth we can be absolutely sure of one thing: They will look nothing like us.
Would an extra-terrestrial lifeform have a similar bone material to humans? These skulls are found in Peru quite frequently because of ancient skull-shaping techniques.
The teeth look weird though. Perhaps it's a Nosferatu vampire skull...
The teeth look weird though. Perhaps it's a Nosferatu vampire skull...
The way I look at it is that if it is an alien it doesn't matter to all us plebes because that information would probably never be released to the public despite all common sense, this makes it interesting, but largely irrelevent.
One point of consideration though is that we all know about cranial binding, deformities, and other things, and I'd imagine that was the reason for calling in multiple experts from more than one nation to examine the remains. The fact that the experts are not mentioned by name is actually the most compelling reason to doubt this, if not for that detail I might suspect they had found something unusual as opposed to this being an intentional overreaction for the lulz.
Nothing to do with this article, but truthfully I think those people who are so quick to scream "hoax" due to there being so many of them, are just as bad as those perpetuating the hoaxes. Especially when it comes down to a lot of debunkers and such being just as bad as the hoaxsters in many cases.
One point of consideration though is that we all know about cranial binding, deformities, and other things, and I'd imagine that was the reason for calling in multiple experts from more than one nation to examine the remains. The fact that the experts are not mentioned by name is actually the most compelling reason to doubt this, if not for that detail I might suspect they had found something unusual as opposed to this being an intentional overreaction for the lulz.
Nothing to do with this article, but truthfully I think those people who are so quick to scream "hoax" due to there being so many of them, are just as bad as those perpetuating the hoaxes. Especially when it comes down to a lot of debunkers and such being just as bad as the hoaxsters in many cases.
I'll be honest, that sounded kinda jerk-y.Earnest Cavalli said:
If Horrible Histories is to be believed the Incas used to use wooden boards to mould the shape of a child's skull to resemble the mountain they would be sacrificed on so yeah, I imagine it's just an Incan corpse and the Russian scientists in question just weren't up to scratch on their Peruvian history.
Of course, it's possible that the cranial-binding explanation is actually an elaborate cover story.Therumancer said:
Curious about that too. If it starts looking like Lilu's dna (5th Element) I'll get my welcome mat out.DTWolfwood said:
That is a nice skull but it looks familiar. Was it buried with a book titled "To Serve Man?"
Call me skeptical, but any being with a head the size of it's body doesn't seem like a viable creature. Though, maybe they pulled a buffalo and killed the freak in their horde.
It's very easy to say hoax to things because the sceptics require people to follow the scientific method.Therumancer said:
In this case people have observed that there is unusual remains of a human, and have jumped straight to the conclusion that it is an alien, when the proper procedure would be to publish a hypothesis, test and then debate the results.
The entirety of this case therefore relies on the appeal to authority fallacy rather than any sound arguments. It does not debunk anything but it also doesn't prove anything, the rational conclusion is therefore that we know unusual human remains have been found in Peru.
Seems a lot more likely to me we have someone who suffered from hydrocephalus, no?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocephalus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocephalus