Peter Jackson Writes Legolas Into The Hobbit

Recommended Videos

Rack

New member
Jan 18, 2008
1,379
0
0
BehattedWanderer said:
*coughcoughshoehorningfanservicecoughcough*

In all seriousness, the liberties Jackson has taken haven't been that bad, although that whole Arwen thing still rings to be kind of annoying. Legolas' appearance isn't even that impossible from the adventure. It's not like Jackson is fool enough to put Legolas into the party, or to give him a lead. We're talking cameo/few screen shots here, with a few lines of dialogue. Here's hoping for an damn good movie anyway.
Really? I'd have thought he was more than fool enough to put him into the party considering what a hash he made of LotR.
 

Coranico

New member
Jul 28, 2009
74
0
0
Anjel said:
Break Tolkein lore
Get fit guy in film
?????
Profit
Though he isn't specifically mentioned by name Legolas is in The Hobbit, he's one of the Elven King's sons. It'd only be breaking the lore if he was in the movie any more than he needed to be i.e. One or two lines standing behind the king, looking like a bawss.
 

ezeroast

New member
Jan 25, 2009
767
0
0
i think they should just play it as the book was written. I dont remember any refrence to Frodo in there either but he will be in the movie also. I just dont understand.
I guess its been about 12 years since I've read it though, I might be wrong.

Edit: Ok i didnt realise that lego was in Mirkwood. As long as they dont overdo it I dont care. Cameo's all round
 

Laxman9292

New member
Feb 6, 2009
457
0
0
keideki said:
This confirms my fears that the whole Hobbit movie will be a sad sad sham. Damn you Peter Jackson, DAMN YOU STRAIT TO HELL!

On the other side of the coin, it might not be too bad, but I have a serious problem when movie makers take big liberties with the source materials like this. What they did with LoTR was acceptable but I really can't get behind this kind of change.
Why? Because while Legolas was alive and living in Mirkwood at the time, not to mention the son of the king and therefore a prominent figure in Mirkwood, it makes no sense for him to have a cameo because he wasn't specifically mentioned in the book? And all the extras in the movie who weren't specifically mentioned in the book shouldn't be there either! Tolkien didn't specifically write an elven male #3 into the book, I'll be damned if I allow him to be seen in the movie! NERD RAGE!

Honestly, I'm about as hardcore a LotR nerd as you can get (started reading the Hobbit in 3rd grade, unabridged LotR, Silmarillion, random books about weapons and armor of Middle Earth etc.) But getting into a nerd rage over something like this, especially where it makes sense to have him make an appearance, even if Tolkien didn't write something specifically about it ("just then the group caught a glimpse of the king's fancy boy of a son").
 

Laxman9292

New member
Feb 6, 2009
457
0
0
Aedrial said:
Personally the elf can go sod it. I'm an Aragorn man.
Definitely would be more badass if he just kept the Strider name though. Strider > Aragorn. It's just science. [/Ron Burgundy voice]
 

Laxman9292

New member
Feb 6, 2009
457
0
0
RivFader86 said:
Wonder if he will have pimples and braces...guess he was a rather young elf in lotr? so 60 years ago he should be teenagerish? ;P
Haha, doubt it, seeing as he's approximately 2900 years old by this point. Puberty must go by in the blink of an eye, relatively, for elves. Lucky bastards.
 

keideki

New member
Sep 10, 2008
510
0
0
Laxman9292 said:
keideki said:
This confirms my fears that the whole Hobbit movie will be a sad sad sham. Damn you Peter Jackson, DAMN YOU STRAIT TO HELL!

On the other side of the coin, it might not be too bad, but I have a serious problem when movie makers take big liberties with the source materials like this. What they did with LoTR was acceptable but I really can't get behind this kind of change.
Why? Because while Legolas was alive and living in Mirkwood at the time, not to mention the son of the king and therefore a prominent figure in Mirkwood, it makes no sense for him to have a cameo because he wasn't specifically mentioned in the book? And all the extras in the movie who weren't specifically mentioned in the book shouldn't be there either! Tolkien didn't specifically write an elven male #3 into the book, I'll be damned if I allow him to be seen in the movie! NERD RAGE!

Honestly, I'm about as hardcore a LotR nerd as you can get (started reading the Hobbit in 3rd grade, unabridged LotR, Silmarillion, random books about weapons and armor of Middle Earth etc.) But getting into a nerd rage over something like this, especially where it makes sense to have him make an appearance, even if Tolkien didn't write something specifically about it ("just then the group caught a glimpse of the king's fancy boy of a son").
If you read the other replies to my post you might understand my point of view better. Or if you read the subtext of SARCASM in my post you might also understand better...
 

RivFader86

New member
Jul 3, 2009
396
0
0
Laxman9292 said:
RivFader86 said:
Wonder if he will have pimples and braces...guess he was a rather young elf in lotr? so 60 years ago he should be teenagerish? ;P
Haha, doubt it, seeing as he's approximately 2900 years old by this point. Puberty must go by in the blink of an eye, relatively, for elves. Lucky bastards.
Hmmmmm i doubt that...in retrospect it would be a very short time...but at the time beeing they just lived in a regular livespann so i guess a year would just feel like it does to a human and if puberty lasts longer for elves (since they mature much later) it could even be worse ;P
 

Kimarous

New member
Sep 23, 2009
2,011
0
0
I see no problem with this. Heck, I'm even counting on an in-joke about Legolas's alcoholic resistance, as seen in "Return of the King"; when you're several hundred years old AND you regularly drink wine from Dale, a piddly mug of Rohan swill ain't gonna faze ya. >:D
 

Anjel

New member
Mar 28, 2011
288
0
0
Coranico said:
Anjel said:
Break Tolkein lore
Get fit guy in film
?????
Profit
Though he isn't specifically mentioned by name Legolas is in The Hobbit, he's one of the Elven King's sons. It'd only be breaking the lore if he was in the movie any more than he needed to be i.e. One or two lines standing behind the king, looking like a bawss.
It's been a few years since I read the Hobbit, but you are correct, I realise now that you've said it. As long as he doesn't start sliding down the trunk of an oliphaunt and counting up the dead bodies, I guess we are safe.
 

veum

New member
Nov 23, 2010
27
0
0
Shamanic Rhythm said:
An 'iconic character'? Bloom, without a doubt one of the worst overactors out there right now, came to a character in the books who comes across as a mild mannered, articulate ponce, who largely fights from a distance, and with the aid of gratuitous special effects turned him into a brooding, unsubtle lout who pulls off all kinds of ridiculous ninja moves in battle. It was without a doubt the single worst part of the trilogy for me, in an adaptation that I overall enjoyed.

Knowing Jackson, he'll find a way to shoehorn some more Shaolin monk style combat with Bloom into the films, probably during the Battle of the Five Armies, and it will stick out like a rhinoceros in drag.
I couldn't have said it better my self!
 

To_Sirius

New member
Aug 2, 2009
25
0
0
@ the above:

And how would you guys visually represent THOUSANDS OF YEARS experience in a supporting character in a film?
 

Laxman9292

New member
Feb 6, 2009
457
0
0
keideki said:
If you read the other replies to my post you might understand my point of view better. Or if you read the subtext of SARCASM in my post you might also understand better...
Sorry, it was clear in the first half but the second half confused me cause it sounded sincere. Some people might actually consider this taking a big liberty with the source material so it's not hard to imagine you're serious.
 

keideki

New member
Sep 10, 2008
510
0
0
Laxman9292 said:
keideki said:
If you read the other replies to my post you might understand my point of view better. Or if you read the subtext of SARCASM in my post you might also understand better...
Sorry, it was clear in the first half but the second half confused me cause it sounded sincere. Some people might actually consider this taking a big liberty with the source material so it's not hard to imagine you're serious.
I take my Tolkien seriously, I just am wary about how far they are going to take this. A cameo is all well and dandy, I would like that, but if they re-write it enough to give him a larger roll then I will be very disappointed in them.
 

Alucard788

New member
May 1, 2011
307
0
0
You can never, ever, go wrong when you add more elves to a story.

...and no I'm not being sarcastic. >_>
 

Littlee300

New member
Oct 26, 2009
1,741
0
0
Monkfish Acc. said:
Littlee300 said:
Monkfish Acc. said:
Tom Goldman said:
"Ten years ago, Orlando Bloom created an iconic character with his portrayal of Legolas"
Yeah pretty much every woman I know is going to drag me to see this movie now.
Subtle bragging FTW
Yes, it is subtle bragging to say I am going to be dragged to a movie so my friends can perv over some dude in a wig.

What.
No, it is subtle bragging to be going
"Now all the girls are going to be dragging me to be with them when they watch this. Oh sigh."
 

Monkfish Acc.

New member
May 7, 2008
4,101
0
0
Littlee300 said:
Monkfish Acc. said:
Littlee300 said:
Monkfish Acc. said:
Tom Goldman said:
"Ten years ago, Orlando Bloom created an iconic character with his portrayal of Legolas"
Yeah pretty much every woman I know is going to drag me to see this movie now.
Subtle bragging FTW
Yes, it is subtle bragging to say I am going to be dragged to a movie so my friends can perv over some dude in a wig.

What.
No, it is subtle bragging to be going
"Now all the girls are going to be dragging me to be with them when they watch this. Oh sigh."
Somebody is projecting a little.

My friends have a habit of forcing me to do things with them. Otherwise I would never stop moping in my angerhole.
All the dudes I know did much the same with some shitty movie that had Megan Fox in it, back when liking Megan Fox was still cool.

Oh wait, is that bragging?? My bad, I should stop that. Drawing attention to the fact that I inexplicably have friends. That is just such a douche move, I should bury myself in this big pile of fuck.