Peter Jackson Writes Legolas Into The Hobbit

Lionsfan

I miss my old avatar
Jan 29, 2010
2,842
0
0
Johnnyallstar said:
Hopefully it's only a cameo style shot in Rivendell, with maybe a line or two. I just don't want him through the entire thing giving Thorin Oakenshield the Gimli role.
I would imagine it would probably be in Mirkwood (if memory serves me Legolas' Dad was the King during and after The Hobbit) and have a larger (but still small) role in the second film (the one that's presumably going to play into Fellowship)
 

Jumwa

New member
Jun 21, 2010
641
0
0
Yes, Orlando Bloom created Legolas.

I know what he was trying to say, but the actual statement Jackson made just rankles regardless.
 

Ashcrexl

New member
May 27, 2009
1,416
0
0
goddammit, he's so pretty. he made the rest of the movies look ugly. what are you up to, jackson? what is your game?
 

dstreet121

New member
Feb 21, 2011
89
0
0
To_Sirius said:
dstreet121 said:
Part of the Hobbit takes place in Mirkwood. Legolas is the Prince of Mirkwood. As long as Legolas only shows up in Mirkwood I see no problem here. (Although I fear that he may be thrown in at the final battle of the Hobbit fighting with the elves).
Why would you fear that? His sons (or at least one of them) accompany Thranduil and his army of elves during those last scenes.
Your right, never mind. I forgot about that, proves what I know.
 

sunburst

Media Snob
Mar 19, 2010
666
0
0
This isn't a good idea but it won't have any impact on the quality of the film. Just pointless marketing to excite the average fans of the movies.
 

Puzzlenaut

New member
Mar 11, 2011
445
0
0
RivFader86 said:
Wonder if he will have pimples and braces...guess he was a rather young elf in lotr? so 60 years ago he should be teenagerish? ;P
By the time of LotR, Legolas is 700 years old so unless he spent the other 650 years as an infant, I doubt it :p
[sup]source: top trumps cards >.<[/sup]

Also, I think it would be really cool if he appeared just as an extra -- no camera to zoom in on him or anything, no lines and no badassery -- he should just stand about in a couple of moments and that should be it.

That would be cool.
 

koroem

New member
Jul 12, 2010
307
0
0
Orlando Bloomin Onion makes movies bad.....

On the bright side, Mark Walburg might not be in the Uncharted movie with the director backing out, so maybe this is the universe balancing itself out?
 

OhSnap

New member
Feb 4, 2010
102
0
0
...The reason I liked Jackson's LotR movies was because he was fairly faithful to the books. Understandably he had to cut some scenes (and completely ruined the character of Faramir, which I will never forgive him for -_-), but overall he stayed faithful.

I don't get why he would want to write in Legolas when he wasn't in the Hobbit. Don't get me wrong, I liked Bloom in the trilogy, but he has no place in the Hobbit. Unless it's like a 5 minute kind of hanging out in the background thing.

I'm just a stickler for details like that though.
 

To_Sirius

New member
Aug 2, 2009
25
0
0
Herman Zindler said:
I am a pretty hardcore fan of Tolkien's original works - and I have to say - writing Legolas in isn't that huge of a departure or that infeasible in the continuity of the events of the Hobbit. Bilbo goes to the halls of Thranduil for goodness sake.

Several of Peter Jackson's alterations to The Lord of the Rings (e.g. Arwen, Osgiliath, Gandalf's confrontation with the Witch King, the ridiculousness that Treebeard wouldn't know what Saruman was up to in his own forest, etc., etc.) were much more inflammatory than this and, even so, I'll be the first to argue that Mr. Jackson has handled enough of the content from the books with deference and respect to warrant a few liberties like this here and there.

Still, all will be forgiven if he includes Beorn :D
Beorn is confirmed and will be played by Mikael Persbrandt.
*nerdgasm*
 

Gladiateher

New member
Mar 14, 2011
331
0
0
Sigh... I am disappoint after busting out such a great trilogy who'd a thunk Pete would sink so low.
 

iblis666

New member
Sep 8, 2008
1,106
0
0
To_Sirius said:
This whole article is pointless. While he's not mentioned by name, he is infact mentioned in the book; as he is a Prince of Mirkwood and his father plays a MASSIVE part in the third act. I recall the book mentioning Thranduil's sons specifically. In fact, I even recall a quote where Thranduil says something along the lines of Bilbo being more deserving of the title of "Prince" than his sons, who happen to be standing next to him.
Call me a hardcore hobbit nerd, but those idiots on facebook don't know what they are talking about.
was thinking the exact same thing, people need to read the damn book before they go off on a character being where they think he shouldnt be. Hell i think the only knowledge of the hobbit is what they hear from others and maybe seeing the cartoon years ago.
 

Shamanic Rhythm

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,653
0
0
An 'iconic character'? Bloom, without a doubt one of the worst overactors out there right now, came to a character in the books who comes across as a mild mannered, articulate ponce, who largely fights from a distance, and with the aid of gratuitous special effects turned him into a brooding, unsubtle lout who pulls off all kinds of ridiculous ninja moves in battle. It was without a doubt the single worst part of the trilogy for me, in an adaptation that I overall enjoyed.

Knowing Jackson, he'll find a way to shoehorn some more Shaolin monk style combat with Bloom into the films, probably during the Battle of the Five Armies, and it will stick out like a rhinoceros in drag.
 

coheedswicked

New member
Mar 28, 2010
142
0
0
RivFader86 said:
Wonder if he will have pimples and braces...guess he was a rather young elf in lotr? so 60 years ago he should be teenagerish? ;P
Um... no. Legolas is stated as being far older than Gimli, who was 139 in LOTR.
 

EvilPicnic

New member
Sep 9, 2009
540
0
0
What's wrong with this? Legolas is a prince of Mirkwood, and Mirkwood featrures very heavilky in The Hobbit. No, Legolas is not mentioned by name, but it is almost sillier to assume that he wasn't there. he could be any one of many unnamed characters who appear. As a Tolkein fan I think this is a very good thing, thankyouverymuch.
 

To_Sirius

New member
Aug 2, 2009
25
0
0
Shamanic Rhythm said:
An 'iconic character'? Bloom, without a doubt one of the worst overactors out there right now, came to a character in the books who comes across as a mild mannered, articulate ponce, who largely fights from a distance, and with the aid of gratuitous special effects turned him into a brooding, unsubtle lout who pulls off all kinds of ridiculous ninja moves in battle. It was without a doubt the single worst part of the trilogy for me, in an adaptation that I overall enjoyed.

Knowing Jackson, he'll find a way to shoehorn some more Shaolin monk style combat with Bloom into the films, probably during the Battle of the Five Armies, and it will stick out like a rhinoceros in drag.
Stick out over the GIANT BEAR?

@iblis666 /agree. It seems the media as a whole are trying to find little flaws in a film that only just begun shooting.
 

Bon_Clay

New member
Aug 5, 2010
744
0
0
I've read the Hobbit twice but both times were over a decade ago so I can't remember it very well. As far as movie meddling goes, this isn't too bad. Its actually plausible to the story, he could've been in some scenes of the book without anyone knowing who he is since it takes place before LOTR. He's a bloody elf, he's old as hell but still gets to keep his pretty boy face, that's the point of being an elf.

So I'm not worried. I'm still looking forward to it, and I think I will enjoy the Hobbit adaptations even more than the LOTR trilogy.