It's deephelm all over again! I seriously don't understand why he doesn't just write his own Fantasy instead of just completely re-writing the freaking orginals XD
oh, I don't know, the dwarves were kept captive for quite some time and we didn't know wether they had "visitors" because the story is told by Bilbo. There are quite a few ways to give Legolas some spotlight without violating canon.Tom Phoenix said:That said, however, it does depend on how much Legolas will actually be involved in the movie. If he just makes an extended cameo appearance, that would be completely fine and quite fitting. But if he actually interacts with the protagonists, then that would be a problem.
Step 1) Read the above posts.Tiger Sora said:Stick to whats already written you moron. Tolkien is turning in his grave.
Legolas' appearance is fine, but I'm pretty sure it's impossible for Frodo to appear in The Hobbit. He's 33 at the start of Fellowship and by my reckoning the Hobbit takes place about 80 years beforehandTom Phoenix said:But to be honest, I think Jackson has been handling these "non-canon" appearances quite well so far. Frodo is being included in a way that it doesn't conflict with the canon, so I am sure Legolas will be included in the same way.
It's all about framing. "The Hobbit" is a book by Bilbo Baggins and the whole story of the movie will be Bilbo reading the book to Frodo, if I recall correctly.Purple Shrimp said:Legolas' appearance is fine, but I'm pretty sure it's impossible for Frodo to appear in The Hobbit. He's 33 at the start of Fellowship and by my reckoning the Hobbit takes place about 80 years beforehand
This is true, though the film makers have admitted that they'll be showing a number of events which occurred between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, which is why The Hobbit will span two films.Purple Shrimp said:Legolas' appearance is fine, but I'm pretty sure it's impossible for Frodo to appear in The Hobbit. He's 33 at the start of Fellowship and by my reckoning the Hobbit takes place about 80 years beforehandTom Phoenix said:But to be honest, I think Jackson has been handling these "non-canon" appearances quite well so far. Frodo is being included in a way that it doesn't conflict with the canon, so I am sure Legolas will be included in the same way.
Someone else has already brought up how a cameo of him could actually make some sense.Purple Shrimp said:Legolas' appearance is fine, but I'm pretty sure it's impossible for Frodo to appear in The Hobbit. He's 33 at the start of Fellowship and by my reckoning the Hobbit takes place about 80 years beforehandTom Phoenix said:But to be honest, I think Jackson has been handling these "non-canon" appearances quite well so far. Frodo is being included in a way that it doesn't conflict with the canon, so I am sure Legolas will be included in the same way.
If thats all they do with Frodo I wouldn't really mind, it doesn't bother the real story and lets them have their precious tie-ins.mikozero said:not if its through Bilbo telling the story to Frodo and simply used to frame the story.
remember "The Hobbit" or "There and Back Again" is written by Blibo inside the larger story itself.