Yeah, B&W's always been with Microsoft. Pop, Pretty sure they're EA, as I recall them being EA back in the day. Could be wrong on that though.Imperioratorex Caprae said:I am unsure if MS owns the IP's for B&W since they technically have Lionhead now. But I'd consider that very likely.Mutant1988 said:[...]
And those IPs belong to EA if I'm not mistaken (100% on DK, not on Populous and B&W)...
That makes me even more sad.
EA has Populous, it was free on Origin at one point. Theme Hospital is currently free.BeerTent said:Why is this man still relevant?
It kind on annoys me in this regard too. Why does Peter get away with committing fraud, yet when I try it, I'll get an officer knocking on my door?
And it's time and time again! You'd think people woul- aah. Fuckit. People are fucking stupid.
Yeah, B&W's always been with Microsoft. Pop, Pretty sure they're EA, as I recall them being EA back in the day. Could be wrong on that though.Imperioratorex Caprae said:I am unsure if MS owns the IP's for B&W since they technically have Lionhead now. But I'd consider that very likely.Mutant1988 said:[...]
And those IPs belong to EA if I'm not mistaken (100% on DK, not on Populous and B&W)...
That makes me even more sad.
I have to disagree. Uwe Boll produced at least one good product.Olrod said:Peter Molyneux is like the Uwe Boll of videogame development.
Actually, Eurogamer just had an article with him. He got to visit the studio, got a signed poster and t-shirt, and then hasn't been in real contact with them since. So outside of that, nothing that was "life changing."The Bucket said:Whatever happened to that guy who won the Curiosity cube thing? Has he seen any cash out of this?
I think Peter may have made a bad choice going with Kickstarter. Customers find silly old Peter over-promising and blowing all his budget because of how gosh darn excited he is a lot less cute when its their money he's burned and not some publishers.
To be fair, Uwe Boll simply doesn't give a shit and releases blatant garbage. Peter's issue has always been promising the sun and stars and never reaching those lofty goals, but even if his games are highly dissapointing, they're not that bad.Olrod said:Peter Molyneux is like the Uwe Boll of videogame development.
Maybe "some publishers" weren't too thrilled with his recent track record, either.The Bucket said:I think Peter may have made a bad choice going with Kickstarter. Customers find silly old Peter over-promising and blowing all his budget because of how gosh darn excited he is a lot less cute when its their money he's burned and not some publishers.
Interesting read. It sounds like 22Cans had no idea what to do with their eventual "winner".Qitz said:Actually, Eurogamer just had an article with him. He got to visit the studio, got a signed poster and t-shirt, and then hasn't been in real contact with them since. So outside of that, nothing that was "life changing."
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-02-11-the-god-who-peter-molyneux-forgot
18 months later and not a damn thing. At least he's taking it like a champ.
More like promising an awesome wonderful spaghetti dinner made from scratch, with great meatballs and sauce and other garnishes... and then, after screwing up trying to make the noodles, overcooking the sauce, getting the spice balance in the meatballs wrong, and then sheepishly admitting that you're not as great a cook as you believe yourself to be, while trying to salvage the disaster.Dalisclock said:Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but just in case you aren't, it's less being a con-man and more of repeatedly claiming his games will be super awesome and have a ton of features, only to be released and be somewhat less impressive.Silentpony said:So is he just like a conman or something?
Like if I promised you a wonderful spaghetti dinner, then proceeded to open a can of franco-american, heat it up in the microwave and serve it to you with plastic spoons. Not so much lying but sure as hell not living up to the promises made.
How though? People who were familiar with his name should have known that he never delivers on his promises. NEVER. He's made some fun stuff a long time ago, and even that stuff wasn't nearly as good as it should have been. You can see obviously wasted potential in every single one of his works. The guy can't be trusted.SonOfVoorhees said:He sold on his name alone.
As time goes on I have more and more trouble giving Peter enough credit to attribute it all to simple overexcitement and incompetence. He's been doing this for a while, he must have some idea that some of his promises might be a bit overstatedScow2 said:More like promising an awesome wonderful spaghetti dinner made from scratch, with great meatballs and sauce and other garnishes... and then, after screwing up trying to make the noodles, overcooking the sauce, getting the spice balance in the meatballs wrong, and then sheepishly admitting that you're not as great a cook as you believe yourself to be, while trying to salvage the disaster.Dalisclock said:Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but just in case you aren't, it's less being a con-man and more of repeatedly claiming his games will be super awesome and have a ton of features, only to be released and be somewhat less impressive.Silentpony said:So is he just like a conman or something?
Like if I promised you a wonderful spaghetti dinner, then proceeded to open a can of franco-american, heat it up in the microwave and serve it to you with plastic spoons. Not so much lying but sure as hell not living up to the promises made.
Peter Molyneux is a guy who wants to make people become Gods... but his ambition overshoots his ability.
After reading that I think even less of Molyneux. He really is just a professional con man, up there with Randy Pitchford.Qitz said:Actually, Eurogamer just had an article with him. He got to visit the studio, got a signed poster and t-shirt, and then hasn't been in real contact with them since. So outside of that, nothing that was "life changing."The Bucket said:Whatever happened to that guy who won the Curiosity cube thing? Has he seen any cash out of this?
I think Peter may have made a bad choice going with Kickstarter. Customers find silly old Peter over-promising and blowing all his budget because of how gosh darn excited he is a lot less cute when its their money he's burned and not some publishers.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-02-11-the-god-who-peter-molyneux-forgot
18 months later and not a damn thing. At least he's taking it like a champ.
Nah with Peter Molyneux its more like he really enjoys making a spaghetti dinner and is really enthusiastic about it, talks people into joining him for the greatest spag bol ever and then disappears into the kitchen for most of the evening with all kinds of 21 day matured mince steak, hand picked mushrooms, sun ripened tomatoes and garden grown herbs.Silentpony said:Yeah, but if you start a Kickstarter campaign on making a perfect spaghetti dinner, and then after making your funding goal simply opened up a single can of Chef Boyardee, poured half of it into a bowl, and then said you were bored and walked away, all the while refusing people Kickstarter refunds...what OTHER term do we have but conman?Dalisclock said:Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but just in case you aren't, it's less being a con-man and more of repeatedly claiming his games will be super awesome and have a ton of features, only to be released and be somewhat less impressive.Silentpony said:SNIP
Like if I promised you a wonderful spaghetti dinner, then proceeded to open a can of franco-american, heat it up in the microwave and serve it to you with plastic spoons. Not so much lying but sure as hell not living up to the promises made.
Liar, maybe. Thief would probably be more accurate, honestly.
A little too much dreaming is how. People read Peter Molyneux and God Game and instantly wanted to believe him so they gave money. I almost did too but then I remembered he has a horrible track record and didn't. I'm sure a good bit of them also thought a lot of his faults were due to publishers and that he could handle it on his own perfectly fine. Nope. It's 100% him.Adam Jensen said:How though? People who were familiar with his name should have known that he never delivers on his promises. NEVER. He's made some fun stuff a long time ago, and even that stuff wasn't nearly as good as it should have been. You can see obviously wasted potential in every single one of his works. The guy can't be trusted.SonOfVoorhees said:He sold on his name alone.