I think the language of this is unnecessarily confusing and distracts from what is actually being said.
Peter doesn't like most modern free demos that are tiny, less functional versions of the game that don't let you keep the progress you made in them when you buy the full version.
What he is doing is still a free demo; it's just longer and doesn't force you to start over when you get the full game.
I like what Peter's doing, but for clarity's sake, call a free demo a free demo. Just make clear that it's a BETTER free demo. When I first saw the title of the article, I got mad at Peter on the basis that I thought he was saying bad things about the concept of being able to try games before buying, and that's not what he was saying at all.
Actually, this explains quite a bit. Perhaps Peter doesn't promise more than he gives; he's just bad enough at communicating that it sounds like he's offering you the world when he's actually just giving you Belgium.
Peter doesn't like most modern free demos that are tiny, less functional versions of the game that don't let you keep the progress you made in them when you buy the full version.
What he is doing is still a free demo; it's just longer and doesn't force you to start over when you get the full game.
I like what Peter's doing, but for clarity's sake, call a free demo a free demo. Just make clear that it's a BETTER free demo. When I first saw the title of the article, I got mad at Peter on the basis that I thought he was saying bad things about the concept of being able to try games before buying, and that's not what he was saying at all.
Actually, this explains quite a bit. Perhaps Peter doesn't promise more than he gives; he's just bad enough at communicating that it sounds like he's offering you the world when he's actually just giving you Belgium.