Pi * 1337% = 42. My mind is blown.

Recommended Videos

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,660
0
0
numaiomul said:
guys you're complicating the situation :p
1= 1/3 + 2/3 = 0.(3) + 0.(6) = 0.(9) = 9/9 =1
0.(3)=0.33333333333...
simple algebra :)
oh and btw: you can't do math without the entire number (like you used 0.999...)
That is why I used an acceptable math notation. I indicated a trend of repetition and the trailing elipses tells the reader that it carries on in this way forever. I even pointed that out in the very post you quoted for those where not familiar with this notational convention.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,075
0
0
KaiRai said:
Think about this:

Hydrogen - highly flammable
Oxygen - Highly flammable

Mix them = Water.

Water - Cannot be set alight.


It's weird!!!!
Except in Cleveland.
 

teh_Canape

New member
May 18, 2010
2,665
0
0
well this is from back in the day:

professor: Polar Bears' fur is not white, but mirror like silver, which reflects the white of the snow

me:
 

MadeinHell

New member
Jun 18, 2009
655
0
0
arc1991 said:
MadeinHell said:
Redingold said:
Okay.

Pick a 3 digit number.

Write it out twice, so if you picked 471, you write 471,471.

Divide that number by 7, then divide the answer by 11, then divide that by 13.

Alternatively, multiply your three digit number by 7, then the answer by 11, then 13, 101 and 9901.
Thus you made about 90% of people use 471 making this whole thing insignificant ;P.
Nice trick though ;).
nope, i picked 512 and it worked
I know. It's just that a lot of people will choose 471 and go "oh I guess it only works for that number meh" xp.
It's hard to tell what I was trying to tell just in emotionless text :p
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,075
0
0
MadeinHell said:
arc1991 said:
MadeinHell said:
Redingold said:
Okay.

Pick a 3 digit number.

Write it out twice, so if you picked 471, you write 471,471.

Divide that number by 7, then divide the answer by 11, then divide that by 13.

Alternatively, multiply your three digit number by 7, then the answer by 11, then 13, 101 and 9901.
Thus you made about 90% of people use 471 making this whole thing insignificant ;P.
Nice trick though ;).
nope, i picked 512 and it worked
I know. It's just that a lot of people will choose 471 and go "oh I guess it only works for that number meh" xp.
It's hard to tell what I was trying to tell just in emotionless text :p
Hmm. Interesting way to break down 1,001 and 1,001,001,001---numbers which have properties that mesh very well with three-digit numbers. Multiply it by 1,001,001,001,001,001,001...and you can get the sequence to repeat as often as you'd like.

In other news, my mind was blown today when a girl I've met on campus exactly twice recognized me and smiled at me when I chanced across her again today. If I see her one more time I'm asking her out for coffee.
 

LogicNProportion

New member
Mar 16, 2009
2,155
0
0
O_O

Hooooooooooooooly SHIT! *HEAD ASPLODES*

Um, I think I read somewhere that there's a tear in space that literally is shooting out nonsense. I read it in a newspaper a few years ago, I haven't looked into it...
 

Siuki

New member
Nov 18, 2009
706
0
0
Holy crap. Million to one chance, but it happened. The internet's most elite number's percentage multiplied by the nerdiest number was the meaning of life all along. Who knew.

OT: Apparently, that Black Ops will be 10 times better than Halo: Reach. Oh, you said things that actually turned out to be true... right. That Kim-Jong loves basketball. Oh, Cracked. I thought he just played a heavily-edited communist version of Starcraft 2 in his free time.
 

Ph33onix

New member
Jun 4, 2010
120
0
0
Bigsmith said:
Ph33onix said:
Wardnath said:
Zero to the zero power = 1.

O SHI, what have I done?!
you just proved your don't know math :p
Unless your being sarcasting 0^0 does equal one. anything^0 is one.
Hmm I mixed it up with 0^inf srry, that was the indetermination i was thinking about :p

SubaruSVX said:
(e^(pi*i))+1=0
that's using exact values
like how the fuck
(e^(pi*i))+1 is equal to none other than (e^(pi*i))+1, i has no "real" value that's why it's called imaginary. Unless you consider i the variable which multiplied by pi and to the power which e is raised and added 1 to to equal 0 :)
 

matt87_50

New member
Apr 3, 2009
434
0
0
MadeinHell said:
matt87_50 said:
MadeinHell said:
Wait but... whoa?
Oh god it's like that "what happened to one dollar?" thing!

My mind is going to explo
There is a prize behind one of three closed doors. You pick a door, then one of the OTHER doors you DIDN'T pick is opened, the prize is not behind it. This leaves two doors, the one you picked, and the remaining closed door. One houses the prize, one does not. You are asked if you would like to swap your selection.

Should you?

;D

ohh! does anyone remember the one about the two guys, where one always lies and one is always honest!?
Both those are not really hard (the first one is not really a question of logic but a question of character). The second one is the easiest riddle ever if you know what to ask.
2+2=?
with the first one. statistically, it is always better to swap.

and I think the two guys one has a stipulation where you can only ask one question. (I really can't remember)
 

Coldie

New member
Oct 13, 2009
467
0
0
Ph33onix said:
(e^(pi*i))+1 is equal to none other than (e^(pi*i))+1, i has no "real" value that's why it's called imaginary. Unless you consider i the variable which multiplied by pi and to the power which e is raised and added 1 to to equal 0 :)
The equation is correct, it adds up to zero. The i in it is, indeed, i, the square root of negative one, the imaginary unit. Counterintuitive? Perhaps, but sufficiently advanced math is indistinguishable from magic. Look up Euler's Identity.
 

Redingold

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Mar 28, 2009
1,633
0
0
Ooh, two other things that blew my mind.

1. When I realised how big Graham's Number was.

2. When I realised how small Graham's Number was.

Also, the fact that maths can never be complete is pretty mindboggling.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,930
0
0
superbatranger said:
Knight Templar said:
Google has a calculator. [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=Pi*13.37%3D&btnG=Google+Search&aq=o&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=]
Damn it, is there anything Google can't do?
Can it love?
Edit: Damn ninjas!
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
tthor said:
superbatranger said:
Knight Templar said:
Google has a calculator. [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=Pi*13.37%3D&btnG=Google+Search&aq=o&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=]
Damn it, is there anything Google can't do?
Can it love?
Edit: Damn ninjas!
What is love
Baby don't hurt me
Don't hurt me
No more
Baby don't hurt me
Don't hurt me
No more

Sorry, could not resist.