The.Bard said:
Color me curious... in what was is calling a bunch of people who think - nay, demand - that they be given content at no additional charge anything but a case of entitlement? According to Merriam-Webster:
Definition of ENTITLEMENT (pay special attention to #3):
3: belief that one is deserving of or entitled to certain privileges
Most of the arguments against the DLC rely upon "the belief that the buyer is deserving of or entitled to" the privilege of cost-free DLC. Thus, entitlement.
Pay special attention to the word "BELIEF", it completely undermines "entitlement" as an objective argument.
Here's the real "controversy":
"This DLC is overpriced, and is making the game cost more."
"No, it isn't. You're acting entitled. Shut the fuck up."
What gets defined as "extra"? Who sets the standards? The customer? The Publisher? Well, if we blindly accept the Publisher, then expecting anything more than an opening crawl and a credits roll could be interpreted as "Entitled" too.
If we blindly accept the customer, then the game ought to not only include all the content, but be free of charge as well.
It's a revolving door of useless argumentation. Two sides screaming uselessly at each other over something that does not have a definitive "right" or "wrong" answer.
Hence, why using "entitlement" as an objective argument is absolute bullshit, and using it as a catty insult is nothing more than trolling.