Why does everyone associate digital lock circumvention with piracy? I would buy this specifically so I could continue using my ps3 until after everyone else has had a chance to try out the new "patch".
Beyond that, so long as there is a chance for it to be used for "legitimate" purposes, it cannot be criminalized. That would be unethical.
On a side note about DRM circumvention, there's a claim that consumers are purchasing a "license" and not a product, and that this is so because it says this in the EULA, both on the software and in the manual.
This is also funny, because it is illegal to hold someone to a contract without prior agreement from both parties. Since the EULA is read AFTER the purchase, the consumer is then free to lie to his/her property.