Political correctness is just useless. All it really does is jump around the problem (i.e insulting people). Plus, interestingly, American Indians hate the term "Native American".
This was my first though. I mean... wont this teach you to (EDIT: hate was too strong a word) separate gays?Bobic said:But baa baa rainbow sheep doesn't even fit. . .
Does this mean if you call someone the black sheep of the family, we're suppposed to call them the rainbow sheep of the family?FamoFunk said:Here is a News artical (from 2006) where Children are now being taught to sing "Bah bah rainbow Sheep" instead of "Bah bah Black Sheep"
TRADITIONAL nursery rhymes are being rewritten at nursery schools to avoid causing offence to children.
Instead of singing "Baa baa, black sheep" as generations of children have learnt to do, toddlers in Oxfordshire are being taught to sing "Baa baa, rainbow sheep".
The move, which critics will seize on as an example of political correctness, was made after the nurseries decided to re-evaluate their approach to equal opportunities.
Stuart Chamberlain, manager of the Family Centre in Abingdon and the Sure Start centre in Sutton Courtenay, Oxfordshire, told the local Courier Journal newspaper: "We have taken the equal opportunities approach to everything we do".
Source: The Times [http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article738220.ece]
No one has said they hate it because they cannot be racist etc. to someone. I would never dream of just going up to a Black person and going "you ******" or someone in a wheelchair "you retard"Kortney said:
I'm with him. Nothing annoys me more than someone saying "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS HAS GONE MAD!". Oh poor you. Are you upset because you can't use racist terms anymore? That must be awful.
No. Because then the plural would be `firemans' not `firemen'. And it's actually gender neutral in the same way `mankind' is.Mazza35 said:It's completely out of control.
But just on the fireman not being gender netrual, if I am correct, fireman actually stands for 'Fire manager' So it doesn't discriminate between gender.
Just my three cents.
This is exactly my problem. You seem to fail to realise that before that, minorities in England had to put up with people coming up to them and calling them "Niggers" or "retards" or in my case: "sand niggers". It happened on the television, in politics and in schools. Political correctness has (for a very large part) stopped most of this. And if a consequence of that is now you feel a bit awkward when dealing with minorities, then so be it. It's certainly a better trade off.FamoFunk said:No one has said they hate it because they cannot be racist etc. to someone. I would never dream of just going up to a Black person and going "you ******" or someone in a wheelchair "you retard"
But when it comes to the point, here in the UK, I feel too awkward or scared to call a Black person Black or Asian person Asian in fear of being called racist or someone throwing the racist card at me. We have a problem, thanks to PC.
Ah, thank you for the grammatical correcting, It's just at the railway I work at, we call our Firemen, a Fireman. The girls don't careLukeje said:No. Because then the plural would be `firemans' not `firemen'. And it's actually gender neutral in the same way `mankind' is.Mazza35 said:It's completely out of control.
But just on the fireman not being gender netrual, if I am correct, fireman actually stands for 'Fire manager' So it doesn't discriminate between gender.
Just my three cents.
Neither does "Baa baa african american sheep"Bobic said:But baa baa rainbow sheep doesn't even fit. . .
and technically native Americans aren't native to america they crossed the biering straightChairman Miaow said:About the only things political correctness wise is not calling black people niggers and not calling native Americans Indians. ****** can be a truly offensive word and native Americans aren't Indian.
That don't fly with me, sorry."Gender-neutral" terms such as "firefighter" in place of "fireman"