[POLITICS] Incident in Canada regarding a transgender woman sueing for not getting a brazilian wax.

Squilookle

New member
Nov 6, 2008
3,584
0
0
Eacaraxe said:
OK so is there like... a template website or something where you can make your own versions of that with whatever text you choose? Because if so I've gotta get in on that shiz.
 

Leg End

Romans 12:18
Oct 24, 2010
2,948
58
53
Country
United States
Squilookle said:
OK so is there like... a template website or something where you can make your own versions of that with whatever text you choose? Because if so I've gotta get in on that shiz.
Knock yourself out, famalam.
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,411
16
23
Dirty Hipsters said:
Remember, I'm not the one who said that women find penises attractive and should therefore have no problem touching them, you did. I'm also not the one who said that this woman should have to give a "legitimate reason" for not touching a penis, you did.
I didn't say these things either, which is my point. Oh, I do know what I said that you're referring to, but that you are translating it into this is why I know you're not arguing in good faith.

Literally everyone? That is objectively not true. Mostly it is LilDevils who disagrees with me who is otherwise on my side, and she still is. That's the thing, people on the same side can disagree. No, she is not a Nazi for disagreeing with me by the way. I understand her concerns that motivate her disagreement though, women have a rather shit deal in life and I don't blame her for being concerned about the implications with this case. Really I think our disagreement though comes more from a misunderstanding than a full on opposing view point though.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,545
7,154
118
Country
United States
Leg End said:
Saelune said:
So you can deflect, but I cant? You can defend a pedophile,
When there is actual, proper evidence that suggests such, I'll give some thought to if that's the case.
but only I can be condemned for it when I am not even defending a pedophile?
This slime is arguably the real core of the subject, because they are using trans rights as a shield in all of this. Your support of forcing someone to manipulate genitals or lose their job or business is not helping this matter. Businesses are being specifically targeted. This is a fucking cash payday. Do you support these businesses paying this bastard to stay alive or possibly fold? Do you support lawsuits against businesses that will only work with specific anatomy, or can only work with specific anatomy?
Precedents work both ways, and don't care how "deserving" the original precedent was.

This is roughly the equivalent of that dude that sues everyplace with a "girls night out" or a "ladies drink free" night. Whether or not he's a terrible person has no actual bearing on the case.

And you've tried making ad hominem attacks for 3 pages now. It's a logical fallacy for a reason. This gal being apparently terrible has no bearing on the case. You constantly hammering at it makes your case look bigoted instead of rational.