Poll: A sensitive question about transgender and locker rooms

Recommended Videos

MetalShadowChaos

New member
Feb 3, 2014
105
0
0
I'd say it falls on the person themselves to make the decision based on what will make others feel the least uncomfortable. I mean, in the case of the OP, if someone looks so much like a man at first glance then they should probably consider the fact that a lot of people will probably be uncomfortable if they went into a women's changing room, and they'll probably get annoyed by other people telling them to leave. I wouldn't exactly stop them from going in anywhere, but in the end there's some responsibility on their end.

Personally I always saw it though as an opportunity to just use either, so long as neither cause aforementioned discomfort.
 

Knight Captain Kerr

New member
May 27, 2011
1,283
0
0
Bathroom/changing room of their choice. Although honestly I don't think bathrooms/changing rooms should be segregated on the basis of sex or gender at all.
 

Wakey87

New member
Sep 20, 2011
160
0
0
The locker room they have documentation proving right of access, same as anyone else.
 

Kanova

New member
Oct 26, 2011
180
0
0
Make them go into the locker room that their body shows, not what their mind shows.
 

thewatergamer

New member
Aug 4, 2012
647
0
0
I'm with alot of others in the thread, it if's becoming a problem just make a unisex locker room, that way if you happen to be transgender you can go in their and people that would be "uncomfortable" can just not use the unisex locker room, simple solution, as for the woman I find it hard to believe she was kicked out "just for filing a complaint" their must be alot more to it than that
 

Dizchu

...brutal
Sep 23, 2014
1,277
0
0
While I personally wouldn't go into the women's locker rooms (I literally have so little confidence when it comes to "passing"), the fact is, situations like these aren't about whether a man looks like a man or a woman looks like a woman. If you're a transwoman that is forced to use the men's locker rooms you'd be in an infinitely more dangerous situation that if you were a transwoman using the women's locker rooms.

I feel the same way about prisons. Sending a transwoman to a male prison is basically like throwing her to the lions.
 

FirstNameLastName

Premium Fraud
Nov 6, 2014
1,080
0
0
Chris Moses said:
I am so tired of this bullshit excuse for transphobia. Should we also ban homosexuals from these facilities? How far should we let this ignorant train of thought travel? I am so angry right now... I should stop typing...
What does that even have to do with the situation at hand and how is it even comparable?

I think we need a version of Godwin's law here.
"As an online discussion about transgenderism grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving homosexuality or otherkin approaches 1"
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,866
2,342
118
Chris Moses said:
Can anyone show me a proven example of a transgendered person that went through years of therapy, hormone treatment, and possibly surgery just so they can be a perv and spy on people of the "opposite" sex in bathrooms and looker rooms?

I MEAN SERIOUSLY HAS THIS EVER HAPPENED?!

I am so tired of this bullshit excuse for transphobia. Should we also ban homosexuals from these facilities? How far should we let this ignorant train of thought travel? I am so angry right now... I should stop typing...
I think the worry isn't someone doing all that work to actually physically change to only peek on women (or less likely men but it's certainly possible a woman could do this too) but that a man could just say that they have always felt like a woman in a man's body and therefore should be able to use the woman's locker room. Our hypothetical man hasn't actually made any physical changes.

In the stories case, we don't know how far along (if at all) the transgender woman was at (and I haven't been able to find any story that states that). It is assumed that she had no or very minimal changes done based on the woman's complaint but her complaint is all we have to go on.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
BiH-Kira said:
If you ask me, changing rooms should be based on your sex, not gender.
seventy two said:
I am of the opinion that it is unreasonable to expect that the majority should be forced to be so accommodating that it causes discomfort.
elvor0 said:
Take it literally: from her point of VIEW, she sees what is biologically a male, how is she immedietly supposed to know that this man identifies as a woman? And even if she did, that doesn't change what is physically in front of her.
Hypothetical here. So, we have a trans man who has gone through hormone therapy, and now possesses a face like Gerard Butler. So, by the arguments presented here, this "woman" ought to be going to the woman's changing womb, because of their doubled up X chromosome and vagina. However, do you really think that this transphobic bigot would actually be any more comfortable with a big, hairy, rugged, enwombed Gerard Butler? Fuck no. They'd still complain. However, they'd probably feel nowhere near as awkward as the man you're arguing should just admit they're a woman and deal with it, and they are in nowhere near the same amount of danger. So maybe we should stop worrying so much about the delicate sensibilities of bigots when they wouldn't even feel any better if they had their way anyway, and show a single shred of empathy for the woman this ***** feels so justified repeatedly misidentifying (that last line is directed towards no one in particular, and I am being honest there, no passive aggressive sniping).
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,866
2,342
118
thewatergamer said:
I'm with alot of others in the thread, it if's becoming a problem just make a unisex locker room, that way if you happen to be transgender you can go in their and people that would be "uncomfortable" can just not use the unisex locker room, simple solution, as for the woman I find it hard to believe she was kicked out "just for filing a complaint" their must be alot more to it than that
Depending on the news story you read, she was either kicked out for making the fuss (so complaining to management and when that failed, complaining to the corporate office) or she was kicked out for making remarks and complaining to other women of the gym.

I'd find option #2 more likely since complaining at the company alone shouldn't be enough but I know Planet Fitness has their "No Judgement Policy" (which is usually more for out of shape people going to the gym but I suppose this kind of counts) so maybe they just take that policy REALLY seriously...
 

McElroy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2013
4,625
395
88
Finland
In this day and age they're starting to include private stalls and the like when they renovate the sort of facilities with locker rooms. However as long as a choice must be made between M and F locker rooms I'd say the one that causes the least fuss with everyone is the right one. People wishing for unisex treatment everywhere are going to be wishing for awhile, I'm afraid.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
Locker rooms are gross anyways. As a straight, both physically and emotionally male, I have little desire to see a bunch of old man penis, nor to be showing off my own to strangers.

So ideally, private change rooms for everyone. Barring that, sort by body parts, not feelings.
 

Sarge034

New member
Feb 24, 2011
1,623
0
0
thaluikhain said:
You don't just up and become transgender so as to freak out the sort of people making a fuss over this.

tippy2k2 said:
a man (who identifies as a woman) being in the woman's locker room
No, a woman. A woman was in the women's locker room. And everyone loses their minds. This bullshit is constantly brought up to attack trans people. There is talk about criminalising trans people who go to the wrong bathroom or whatever. If they go in the one for the gender they identify is, the usual suspects freak out. If they go in the other one, the usual suspects freak out.

Would it have been better if this woman had gone to the men's locker room instead?

Hell, should we ban cis women that don't look like some arbitrary and undefined ideal of femininity from locker rooms as well? "Look at her haircut, she doesn't look like a woman, I feel scared!"
I'm all for trans rights, but what? Perhaps he (in the physical form) does identify as a woman (in the mental form), good on her, but she has a penis. To cis women in a changing room that is not a usual thing. And ya know what, if a woman (in the physical form) who identified as a man (in the mental form) got naked in a male changing room I was in, I'd be uncomfortable too. Just because *you're* trans don't mean everyone around you is. Everyone should feel safe in a changing room, everyone.
 

seventy two

New member
Mar 7, 2011
104
0
0
Revnak said:
Hypothetical here. So, we have a trans man who has gone through hormone therapy, and now possesses a face like Gerard Butler. So, by the arguments presented here, this "woman" ought to be going to the woman's changing womb, because of their doubled up X chromosome and vagina. However, do you really think that this transphobic bigot would actually be any more comfortable with a big, hairy, rugged, enwombed Gerard Butler? Fuck no. They'd still complain. However, they'd probably feel nowhere near as awkward as the man you're arguing should just admit they're a woman and deal with it, and they are in nowhere near the same amount of danger. So maybe we should stop worrying so much about the delicate sensibilities of bigots when they wouldn't even feel any better if they had their way anyway, and show a single shred of empathy for the woman this ***** feels so justified repeatedly misidentifying (that last line is directed towards no one in particular, and I am being honest there, no passive aggressive sniping).
Why is it that someone raising a concern immediately make someone 'transphobic bigot'? It is not like they chased the man out, she made a complaint against a decision she disagreed with. That kind of attitude makes it hard for me to consider any argument, because it seems like your thoughts are already set. With that said, to address your hypothetical, they made a choice, no one else should be expected to automatically accommodate for that choice if it interrupts their life. Trans people should not get special treatment, their comfort is valued equally to anyone else's, so if them changing with their gender makes enough others uncomfortable it shouldn't be done, out of respect for others. Honestly I don't get why trans people want to change with their gender, I cannot believe that it is honestly more comfortable creating the awkward situation than it is to just change with their sex and likely create no issue.

That does not mean that I feel Planet Fitness made the wrong choice, just that it is unfair to immediately consider it the right choice without taking time to consider the impact it has on the community. If that is moral they want community members to be accountable for that is within their rights to decide. However people should not be persecuted for dissent towards a policy they were unaware of.
 

Chris Moses

New member
Nov 22, 2013
109
0
0
FirstNameLastName said:
Chris Moses said:
I am so tired of this bullshit excuse for transphobia. Should we also ban homosexuals from these facilities? How far should we let this ignorant train of thought travel? I am so angry right now... I should stop typing...
What does that even have to do with the situation at hand and how is it even comparable?

I think we need a version of Godwin's law here.
"As an online discussion about transgenderism grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving homosexuality or otherkin approaches 1"
Ok... Then what is the problem? If you aren't worried about being oogled by a homosexual in a locker room then what difference should it make if a transgendered person just uses the locker room nevermind if they get some sort of sexual kick out of it? (As long as they don't start staring, masturbating, and/or groping people, you know standard acceptable conduct that most people seem to be able to follow despite their gender and sexual orientation.)
 

faeshadow

New member
Feb 4, 2008
60
0
0
My opinion: People are way too obsessed with dangly bits or lack thereof. Once upon a time, white people were uncomfortable with having black people eating next to them. Eventually we (well, most of us, at least) grew out of it and stopped giving a fuck.

Trust me, ladies, guys have already done plenty of things to sneak peeks into women's locker rooms/restrooms. They don't have to go through the hassle of going through a sex change to do it. Let it go.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
seventy two said:
Revnak said:
Hypothetical here. So, we have a trans man who has gone through hormone therapy, and now possesses a face like Gerard Butler. So, by the arguments presented here, this "woman" ought to be going to the woman's changing womb, because of their doubled up X chromosome and vagina. However, do you really think that this transphobic bigot would actually be any more comfortable with a big, hairy, rugged, enwombed Gerard Butler? Fuck no. They'd still complain. However, they'd probably feel nowhere near as awkward as the man you're arguing should just admit they're a woman and deal with it, and they are in nowhere near the same amount of danger. So maybe we should stop worrying so much about the delicate sensibilities of bigots when they wouldn't even feel any better if they had their way anyway, and show a single shred of empathy for the woman this ***** feels so justified repeatedly misidentifying (that last line is directed towards no one in particular, and I am being honest there, no passive aggressive sniping).
Why is it that someone raising a concern immediately make someone 'transphobic bigot'? It is not like they chased the man out, she made a complaint against a decision she disagreed with. That kind of attitude makes it hard for me to consider any argument, because it seems like your thoughts are already set.
I said she was a bigot for insisting a transwoman was a man after having been informed otherwise. When someone insists a cis woman is a man while knowing better we call that bullying, and we tend to frown on it. I don't see why it suddenly is just trivial ignorance when it is a transwoman they are purposefully misidentifying. It is hurtful, it is hateful, it is wrong. So yes, she is a *****, and she is a bigot. Also, you really shouldn't behave likewise here. It is not like they chased the woman out.

With that said, to address your hypothetical, they made a choice, no one else should be expected to automatically accommodate for that choice if it interrupts their life. Trans people should not get special treatment, their comfort is valued equally to anyone else's, so if them changing with their gender makes enough others uncomfortable it shouldn't be done, out of respect for others. Honestly I don't get why trans people want to change with their gender, I cannot believe that it is honestly more comfortable creating the awkward situation than it is to just change with their sex and likely create no issue.
What the hell? This is some trippy ass shit you're promoting here, and I sincerely doubt you apply it evenly. Should people not insult religion because of the religious majority? Should people not be atheists because of the religious majority? Should people not be gay because of how it causes discomfort among the straight majority? Behaviour is not justified based upon the sensibilities of the majority, that is absolute nonsense. Certainly, behaviours are not justified arbitrarily, they ought to have some deep rationale behind their decision (which is why trans people have to go to psychiatric meetings to receive any treatment), but the comfort of the majority is effectively arbitrary without some independent rational basis, so it serves little better than there being no justification at all.
That does not mean that I feel Planet Fitness made the wrong choice, just that it is unfair to immediately consider it the right choice without taking time to consider the impact it has on the community. If that is moral they want community members to be accountable for that is within their rights to decide. However people should not be persecuted for dissent towards a policy they were unaware of.
They weren't "unaware," they just didn't have a thorough understanding of what the gyms policy of inclusivity extended to. Though I will admit the primary motive for their actions is certainly ignorance, I don't think that said ignorance stems from any lack of explanation from the gym.
 

seventy two

New member
Mar 7, 2011
104
0
0
Revnak said:
What the hell? This is some trippy ass shit you're promoting here, and I sincerely doubt you apply it evenly. Should people not insult religion because of the religious majority? Should people not be atheists because of the religious majority? Should people not be gay because of how it causes discomfort among the straight majority? Behaviour is not justified based upon the sensibilities of the majority, that is absolute nonsense. Certainly, behaviours are not justified arbitrarily, they ought to have some deep rationale behind their decision (which is why trans people have to go to psychiatric meetings to receive any treatment), but the comfort of the majority is effectively arbitrary without some independent rational basis, so it serves little better than there being no justification at all.
Clearly this conversation is not worth having with you since you choose to insult my opinion. I am sorry that I assumed we could have a reasonable discussion. But to answer your question, people should not insult anyone's religion, I know I don't defend people who do. People can be atheist, but like religion this should be a personal and should not be pushed on others who do not want it. Should people not be gay, no, but they should not promote themselves in a way that makes other uncomfortable, the same applies to straight people who are too forward. My point being, people should conduct themselves such that they are not intentionally causing discomfort for others, and if not, they cannot expect that of others.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
seventy two said:
Clearly this conversation is not worth having with you since you choose to insult my opinion.
Yes, because it is wrong. No idea is so sacred that it cannot be insulted. No principle so important that belittling it would tear society apart. What is wrong is wrong, and if it is such, then I will insult it as such.
I am sorry that I assumed we could have a reasonable discussion.
I'm not. I assume the same, I just find it odd that you are so particular about this one little statement about the frankly absurd idea you put forth.
But to answer your question, people should not insult anyone's religion, I know I don't defend people who do.
A strange choice, but consistent at least.
People can be atheist, but like religion this should be a personal and should not be pushed on others who do not want it.
People should not keep their ideas to themselves if they think that they are right. That's just selfish and lazy if you ask me.
Should people not be gay, no, but they should not promote themselves in a way that makes other uncomfortable, the same applies to straight people who are too forward.
Simply living your life as a gay person makes many people uncomfortable. For example, if I were to come out as gay to my family (hypothetically, I'm not actually gay), they would find it very awkward. If I invited them to my wedding I doubt they would attend. Would doing such things be wrong in your opinion?
My point being, people should conduct themselves such that they are not intentionally causing discomfort for others, and if not, they cannot expect that of others.
A line of thought that falls flat as soon as you are in a situation where no matter what, one of two groups is not going to feel comfortable with the situation. So, should we just arbitrarily side with the majority, as you are arguing here? No. First, that would just be arbitrary. As I said earlier, numbers do not guarantee reason. Second, the clear result of deciding disputes like that would be the total oppression of those who do not fall into the majority, as they will simply have to concede with every single dispute until they have nothing left.
 

Lil devils x_v1legacy

More Lego Goats Please!
May 17, 2011
2,728
0
0
This is a difficult issue, unless everyone gets to choose which locker room they use, you cannot just allow "this group of people to get a choice and no one else does", at which point, there is no point in having different locker rooms or restrooms since everyone is going into either. I do think there should always be an alternative to just male and female facility, as this is also an issue when people are bringing children in as well and the parent is of the opposite sex.

When you are talking about areas that people will be undressed in that are segregated by sex, that I think would apply to the biological sex due to the facilities being designed for specific body parts. It is not reasonable to expect a woman to be able to use a urinal the same way a man could, or for a man to have use for a tampon dispenser. In places like saunas, locker rooms, restrooms, men and women will be in various states of undress, for example, where a man would usually have a towel wrapped around his lower body at the spa, the woman will have it wrapped on her whole body and it would be very awkward for a biological woman living as a man to be able to pull that off. Locker room showers are frequently like this:

and in the locker rooms, we were completely nude, in close contact, even helping wash one another's hair at times.
While some of us have no issue with nudity, not everyone has the same levels of modesty, or religious beliefs, and allowing for both sexes into the same facility would create multiple issues. First, those that are not comfortable with this, would stop using the facilities and try to find alternative p-laces to go, which unfortunately would be a much greater number than the actual number of transgendered individuals involved. Even people who have no religious objections about being nude around the opposite sex, transgendered or not, are terribly uncomfortable with this to the point that it is traumatizing to them. One of my younger sisters was this way, and she actually cried for days due to a guy walking in on her when she was undressed, though I could not understand why it bothered her so much, for some it really takes a toll on them.

I think we must consider all involved here, including the transgendered, and I think the laws should be updated to reflect what is considered adequate facilities. I think there should be more options than just male or female, since that does not cover the actual scope of the needs of the people. Having private, unisex or family options available as well I think would greatly improve the current environment for everyone involved. Sometimes not all transgender people are better off even in the facilities of the gender they identify as, for example a biological sexed female who identifies as a male, may be more likely to be assaulted in a mens facility than in the women's, and a sexed male who identifies as a female may be maced in a female facility as well as women frequently become defensive when they are undressing. These things can happen too, and I do not feel that simply trying to force everyone to fit into the " male or female" only categories is solving the problems involved. In the current environment, a transgendered person may be tormented and embarrassed no matter which facility they use and there really needs to be more options.