Ordinaryundone said:
M16. Both of them are instantly recognizable and familiar to nearly anyone who has played an FPS, but I simply prefer the M16. It tends to be a burst-fire weapon in games, which suits my playstyle well. AKs typically sacrifice rate of fire and accuracy for damage, which is nice up close but I feel puts it at a disadvantage at typical assault rifle range.
Plus, its the M16 man! The thing is a classic; way classier than that sand-munching brick the Russians call a gun. Reliability isn't everything; if someone offered me an economy car or a Ferrari, you'd be sure I'd take the sports car.
...so when your M16 gets dirt on it and misfires, I'll take yours off your corpse. The original M16 had a lot of reliability issues, ALOT. If the poll, had been M4 or the M16A2, that'd be a different story. Now if this was a post-apocalyptic game, 5.56mm NATO (or .223 Remington for those of us who dwell in the US) would be much more plentiful as pretty much every western military uses the round. However, for the punch and reliability you can't beat an old fashioned Automat Kalashnikov.
I apologize if you feel insulted, that was not my intention, I just feel that neither rifle is accurately represented in any shooter or game. Also, why isn't there any representation on the AK variants, like the Israeli made Galil, or Saiga variant(which makes a really sweet semi-auto shotgun that looks and uses the same parts as an AK). I know they're not what everyone recognizes, but wouldn't be fun to put some new weapons into everyone's games.