Good morning blues said:
No, that is something that psychopaths do. Yes, women separate men into categories; men do the same thing. Look at all of your female acquaintances; there are some you'd date if you had the opportunity, some you'd fuck, some you'd only do the friend thing with, and some you'd prefer never to talk to again. Furthermore, if a man realizes that a woman is playing games with him, he will do one of three things: if he's that sort of person, he'll start his own mind games and they'll be happy fucking with each other into eternity; if he has any notable level of self-esteem, he'll move on; or, if he's just looking for a relationship so he can feel better about himself, he'll let her shit all over him until she gets sick of it.
People are talking like men don't allow women to do shitty things to them.
Nope, you're wrong. I would fuck or date
none of my female acquaintances, excluding two. One of these is my ex, so I can't say I wouldn't fuck her because I have. The other one is one who has earned great respect with me and I am currently courting. I'll agree there are some I'd prefer to never talk too again, and this is mostly because they were a ***** when I was perfectly polite. I'm not polite all the time, not even close, but I know when I am and when I don't deserve harsh treatment.
And here's the problem with those three options: this isn't mind fucking. It's testing. Any psychologist will agree with me as well as
my old ethics teacher, who was a woman that believed in the righteousness of the human spirit. This is something most women do regardless of whether they are are aware of it or not. If I was living somewhere near you, I would offer to go to a bar or some other place people go to get picked up/pick up with you and prove it. This even happens to me at my work, because it's the place I'm most confident it's the place I get the most attention from female coworkers or customers.
And the problem again is that men
don't realize they are being tested, even if they have healthy levels of self-esteem. The whole "does this make me look fat?" is something that men just deal with, not something that makes them walk away instantly.
Unholykrumpet said:
Ninja, not all women do that. Not even the majority. Some do, and those are the ones that get around a lot, thus keeping the belief alive that the majority, if not all, women are like that. Guys play games too, we just don't see that because, well, we're the guys that don't. We don't see the games that happen with us as you say, how are we supposed to see the games happening to other people? Guy games are different. Guy games are more along the lines of trying to figure out whether or not this chick will sleep with the guy, and then whether or not he wants to keep her, or say "it was a one night thing, don't be mad we were both drunk". I know many guys personally that play these games. It hurts the girl that actually liked the guy and thought he liked her just as much as it hurts the guy that wants to be in the date zone but gets thrown into the friend zone repeatedly. The only difference is the girl gets to have sex before she's rejected, the guy doesn't, and then is expected to be a friend to the girl.
I agree. Men play this game too. But I disagree. MOST women play this game. the ones who are playing these games are the ones who know they are attractive and use it to their advantage. Men get hurt by the women doing it and women get hurt by the men doing it. I agree that it's all categorical bullshit.
What I'm saying, however, is that most women who play the game don't even realize they are doing it, while most guys have to actually be trying to play the game to play it. This is why men tend to be less successful at the game then women. If a man OR a woman doesn't know a game is being played, they are likely to fail at it. And I think it's wrong for the game to be played at all. It's just my educated opinion women play it almost consistently, while men don't.
JMeganSnow said:
Some of us (me) enjoy being treated as special in incidental matters (such as the door-holding thing), but wish to be held to the same standards and receive the same rewards as men for achieving the same things in non-incidental matters. I also think that women properly treat *men* as being special by, say, smiling at them or whatever. It works both ways.
As far as I can tell, the standards/reward thing works fine, so I don't know what most women complain about. Sure, maybe you can't be a firefighter, but that's because you can't shoulder a 200 lb. body and run down a staircase, not because you're a woman. (I know women who CAN do this.)
So let me get this straight. You think that I should, on a usual basis, hold the door open for you and be sensitive to the fact that you are a woman when talking to you in the office, and that you think I should go out of my way to treat you better (like, say, not cussing with) than just a guy I share a cubicle with, but then when it comes promotion time you and I should be equal, although the only thing you've done to reciprocate me going out of my way is a smile here and there.
Do you see the double standard yet?
And I am so confused by your second paragraph. When did personal economics become a job as a firefighter?